Wednesday, July 22, 2020

Most Corrupt Police Forces Are In Most Violent Cities



Studies that show how corrupt police departments are, and whether or not they're more likely to lead to higher violence in the communities they claim to protect, are extremely hard to find, if they exist, and a lot of the data may be unreliable. One study on law enforcement officers arrested, which doesn't focus on whether or not police corruption contributes to higher violence in their cities, says "Surprisingly little is known about the crimes committed by law enforcement officers, in part because there are virtually no official nationwide data collected, .... or available for research analyses."

Another investigation led to the release of "a list of nearly 12,000 cops and applicants who’d been found guilty of all categories of offenses, ranging from disorderly conduct to sexual assault to manslaughter." Instead of trying to reform the police, the establishment responded by trying to covering it up and implying those exposing it may have committed a crime, saying "The list came from the California Commission on Peace Officers Standards and Training, or POST. In response, California’s top law enforcement officer threatened to take legal action against the reporters if the list wasn’t destroyed. Attorney General Xavier Becerra said it had been released by accident, and he asserted that merely possessing a copy was illegal."

This means that, not only are they avoiding collecting information that could help researchers of police corruption, but they often pass laws to make it illegal to disclose some of the best research information they do have. This means that regardless of how much evidence good researchers have about police corruption, it's almost certainly even worse, perhaps much worse.

However, even without cooperation from many of the most powerful institutions, many researchers have been able to put together a significant amount of information about police corruption, and there's good reason to believe that it's worse in some of the poorest and most violent cities in America. Several organizations have made lists of what they consider the most corrupt police forces, including BET which lists 7 of the Most Corrupt Police Cities in History 01/25/2020; one of these is in Mexico, and little information is available about it; but, the other six are all from the USA and they're all above the national average murder rate, with four of them at least three times the average murder rate. Another one covers the 15 Most Corrupt Cities in America, including corruption from other city officials, in addition to the police, and all of them are also have above average murder rates with ten of them more than triple the national average, one more more than double and another two almost double.

If you look through enough of the highest profile stories about police corruption and check to see if they're in cities with high rates of violence, you'll find that almost all of them are, one collection of stories going back several is Marshall Project latest stories on police corruption, and except for a few stories about corruption in Honolulu and a couple more in small towns few have heard of, they're all in very violent cities, often the ones listed above as the most corrupt cities. Another way to cross check this conclusion is to search for police corruption in less violent cities, like El Paso or Sand Diego, etc., and there's no doubt you'll find corruption there as well, but there doesn't seem to be nearly as many stories about it as in more violent cities. On article that turns up in a search for San Diego police corruption is Dozens of Police Officers Across San Diego County Have Been Convicted of Crimes 11/11/2020, which certainly sounds bad, and is bad; however the article refers to a list of nearly 12,000 cops that were found guilty of crimes. If San Diego had there share based on population, then it would be close to 1,000 police officers convicted of crimes, implying the rest of California is even worse.

If you look at the current murder rates for New York, which is historically considered one of the most corrupt police forces in history, this may seem to be an exception, since they're among the lowest murder rates for big cities in the country; however, consideration of the size and history of it may explain this. Some of NYPD's worst corruption took place before at least two major reform movements, on led by the Knapp Commission, in the early 1970s, and the Mollen Commission, in the early 1990s; it wasn't until after the second one when their murder rates began a steady decline that continued over twenty-five years, before this New York was one of the most violent cities in the country. If you figure the average murder rate for 2002-2016 it's 5.81, which is still above average.

It's only the past eight years that it finally went below average. Also, it's the biggest city in the country so many parts of it, often the poorest are still much higher than average, and that's almost certainly where the most corruption is. The first investigation was headed by Whitman Knapp, a Wall Street lawyer, who was presumably concerned with how epidemic levels of police corruption impacted Wall Street profits. It is widely recognized among the best researchers that those with the least amount of political power are most likely to be targeted by corrupt police. When corruption impacts Wall Street profits the political establishment is much more likely to act. These good researchers also know the most effective solutions to this problem; unfortunately their work is often only distributed in the academic community or on alternative media outlets including Rachel Kleinfeld who describes some of the most effective solutions ignored by traditional media in the following article:

These Countries Reformed Their Brutal, Biased Police. The U.S. Can, Too. 07/02/2020

In Bogotá, the moment for long overdue reforms finally came after police raped and murdered a nine-year-old girl at a police station. In Monterrey, Mexico, it arrived years after locals began calling officers polizetas—a mash-up of policía and Los Zetas, the violent drug cartel with whom they often colluded. In the United States, the moment may have come after the brutal killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police.

The United States is far from the only country where police brutality, corruption, or biased treatment of parts of the population have driven demands for reform. Success, however, has been rare—not because reformers don’t know what policies to implement, but because the required reforms were blocked or didn’t stick. To increase the odds of successful police reform, U.S. activists and reformers would be wise to look at lessons from countries and communities where changes succeeded and stuck.

Luckily, what works for fair and effective policing is well known. Decades of research confirm that trust between law enforcement and communities is essential, because controlling crime requires community help. In the United States and Britain, for instance, the vast majority of the crimes that people fear the most, such as homicide and rape, required public tips to solve. Building trust, however, is based less on bringing down crime (the metric many police monitor) than on treating people with respect and fairness. Trust is enhanced by recruiting a force that resembles the community it serves (although sadly, diversity doesn’t necessarily reduce police violence). Finally, hiring more women in law enforcement—a strategy Peru used to break perceptions of widespread corruption—results in more trust and less use of force.

Once officers have gained a community’s trust, they can use public tips to implement policies proven to drastically reduce crime, such as targeting hot spots (the small number of places where most violence happens), and focusing deterrence on the tiny percentage of people responsible for the vast majority of violent crime to prevent them from resorting to violence. Executing both strategies with respect and fairness is, needless to say, essential to their effectiveness.

The problem is getting police—and political leaders—to make these changes and make them stick. In the past few weeks, the United States has taken the first steps. Politicians are on notice from the vocal, voting middle class. That step is crucial—even in Venezuela, one of the world’s most violent countries, it is the most marginalized communities with the least political power that bear the brunt of overly violent and underresponsive policing. In every democracy where systemic police abuse has been tackled, change usually began when the broader public started to care. As a result of this pressure, the U.S. House of Representatives has passed a police reform bill; various U.S. states and communities are making changes as well.

........

One reason for the more extreme strategy of mass firing is that it can be among the few ways for reform-minded politicians to disband police unions that, in their quest for workers’ rights, prevent corrupt and abusive agents from being fired. Unions play an awkward role: While they are essential for democracy, in the area of law enforcement they are often obstacles to policies that enable cultural change—such as promoting best performers or putting new recruits at the cutting edge of reform so that they are immediately acculturated to where the organization wants to go.

The key to accountability is for policymakers grappling with reform to be independent from the police themselves and from ongoing political pressure. The most committed politicians prevent slippage by ensuring that their own fortunes rise and fall with the success of police reform. In Bogotá, former Mayor Antanas Mockus ran on a platform of creating a more civil, less criminal police. He demanded daily briefings from the police force and experimented with policies from mass firing to hiring mimes to regulate traffic. In Medellín, Colombia, former Mayor Sergio Fajardo required police statistics to be maintained by an independent agency and made public monthly. Such pressure kept the reform agenda front and center.

Growing crime, however, can undermine the ability of even the most reform-minded politicians to hold the line. Often, police and politicians erroneously view efforts to improve the treatment of citizens as inherently at odds with police effectiveness. Increased crime leads to public clamor for “toughness”—and tough-on-crime policies nearly always offer greater impunity for the use of force by police. Despite actually causing crime to increase, these tough-sounding policies are election winners in nearly every democracy. If crime rises, reform will backslide, even if reform is the best way to bring crime back down. While labor unions are essential for democracy, in the area of law enforcement they are often obstacles to policies that enable cultural change. Complete article


In all fairness, the reforms she cites haven't been completely successful, but they have taken major steps in the right direction. A major part of the reason why reforms often don't stick, is because it's the corrupt people in power implementing them, and the media doesn't inform the public about the best research teaching how to stop police corruption. In many cases when they do point out some of the biggest problems, they only report in in a low profile manner then forget about it while deceptive propaganda is often repeated over and over again. This is why tough on crime politics sounds very good to many people, even though it doesn't work and leads to increased impunity for use of excessive force, often even for the wrong people.



One clear indication of the corruption of both the police, and the political establishment is the union contracts they negotiate, usually in secret without the knowledge of the public supposedly being protected by police. When Wall Street corporation negotiate a contract with unions their CEOs and stockholders know what's in it; however, citizens don't know what's in the contracts supposedly negotiated on their behalf, as reported in Police contracts can stand in the way of accountability 07/19/2020, which says:
Collective bargaining agreements for officers provide protections that stand in the way of accountability, even when the federal government is overseeing an agency through a consent decree, experts said. The killing of George Floyd by a Minneapolis officer ignited protests and calls for change, but experts say police contracts threaten to undermine those efforts.

Contracts designed to ensure officers receive fair wages and benefits have spilled over into public policy.

"We're ignoring the purpose of the bargaining rights and we're allowing them to step outside of what they were originally supposed to cover," said Ayesha Bell Hardaway of the Case Western University School of Law.

"When talk about discipline, accountability and use of force protocols, we should not be talking about collective bargaining rights because those terms have no business inside of the contracts in the first place."

When contracts are written in private negotiations, that means little input from communities. ......

“A substantial number of these agreements limit officer interrogations after alleged misconduct, mandate the destruction of disciplinary records, ban civilian oversight, prevent anonymous civilian complaints, indemnify officers in the event of civil suits, and limit the length of internal investigations,” he said.

Few if any citizens would ever agree to ban accountability for the police to the citizens they're supposed to protect, yet politicians who negotiate on their behalf routinely do just that, in secret! Nor do they know that they're being stuck with the tab for hundreds of millions if not well over a billion dollars in lawsuits against the police every year as I went into in Duopoly Is Trying To Indoctrinate The Public Like A Cult including some cases where tax payers are stuck with lawsuits from both the victims of police brutality, and the police that are responsible for it, including Philly’s police misconduct cases drain taxpayer money, which says, "the city paid 26 officers at least $1.2 million in back pay and other payments. In addition, the city has paid nearly $4 million to settle federal lawsuits involving 15 of these officers." I also found examples in Florida where cities were forced to pay both the victims of police brutality in one lawsuit, and for back pay to the police responsible for it, often allowing them to rejoin the force again, possibly leading to more lawsuits.

If these funds were going into education, child care, or other social programs that address the root causes of violence then there would be far less violence in these cities and the police often do more to make it worse than to protect the public. For example in New Book Explores Rise and Fall of America's Most Corrupt Police Force 07/15/2020 Brandon Soderberg says:
"I think the easiest way to put it is that they created crime. By committing crimes themselves, but also because robbing drug dealers leads to violence (people get shot when the count isn't right) and dealing drugs disrupts the underground economy. .... And divesting from law enforcement and giving more money to groups such as Safe Streets and other community-facing efforts would go a long way."

For some reason, the same authors of that article and accompanying book, which does offer some good solutions also argued that Police 'reform' doesn't work. Baltimore proves it. 06/18/2020; however, this isn't quite true, and some of the reforms that they recommend are similar to the ones that Rachel Kleinfeld cited as being partly successful in other countries. There have also been partially successful reforms in New York, Detroit, Camden, NJ, New Orleans, and Richmond California, have all implemented major reforms that have had success in dramatically reducing the rates of violence, although they all still have more work to do. It would be more accurate to say that reforms don't work, when neither the police or the politicians want them to work.

I went into this more in Politicians increase crime; Grass roots efforts reduce crime; Politicians steal the credit which covers Richmond California, which is probably the city with the biggest drop in crime of them all, and it continued to drop since I first wrote this. A major part of the reason for this seems to be that the people educated themselves at the local level, despite lack of media coverage of the most effective research to reduce violence, and rejected establishment politicians that weren't sincere elect Gayle McLaughlin, of the Green Party, Mayor for a while. Due to term limits she wasn't able to stay on, but establishment politicians learned that they would have to adopt more rational programs, based on good research or lose elections to other progressives.

Not only are police and politicians incredibly corrupt, but there should be no doubt that the media is also incredibly corrupt and incompetent! In a functioning Democracy, we need diverse media coverage, at least some of which covers the best research on any given academic subject, including into most effective ways to reduce violence, and hold police accountable; as well as coverage for all candidates running for political office, including those basing their campaigns on good research, not just the ones that collect enormous donations from corporations. In our country over 95% of the media is controlled b y 6 corporation, and they ignore the best research on any given subject so we base decisions on lies and propaganda; they also refuse to cover the most honest candidates, ensuring they can't get the name recognition to be viable, effectively rigging elections for corrupt candidates that don't address the needs of the people.





The following are some additional sources or related articles:

A Study in Contrasts Between Rialto Police and Albuquerque Police 05/25/2014

California police use of body cameras cuts violence and complaints 11/04/2013

Body-worn camera study by Executive Fellow Chief Tony Farrar is published in scientific journal 12/30/2014

A controversial legal doctrine protects cops from misconduct lawsuits. Here's how 'qualified immunity' works. 06/08/2020

'Now Is Not the Time for More Studies': Sanders Rips Weak GOP Bill and Demands End to Police Immunity 06/18/2020

Senate passes sweeping police reform bill, limits qualified immunity protections 07/14/2020

Wikipedia: Qualified immunity

These Are the 15 Most Corrupt Cities in America 03/03/2018 1. Washington, D.C. average murder rate from 2002-16: 27.07; 2. Chicago average murder rate from 2002-16: 17.85; 3. Philadelphia average murder rate from 2002-16: 21.13 4. Baltimore average murder rate from 2002-16: 40.45; 5. Miami average murder rate from 2002-16: 16.67; 6. Houston average from 2002-16: 12.91; 7. NY City average murder rate from 2002-16: 5.81; 8. Detroit average murder rate from 2002-16: 42.98; 9. New Orleans average murder rate from 2002-16: 54.02; 10. Newark average murder rate from 2002-16: 32.39; 11. Richmond Va. average murder rate from 2002-16: 27.64; 12. Los Angeles average murder rate from 2002-16: 9.86; 13. Wichita average murder rate from 2002-16: 6.78; 14. Cleveland average murder rate from 2002-16: 19.84; 15. Las Vegas average murder rate from 2002-16: 8.92;

7 of the Most Corrupt Police Cities in History 01/25/2020 1. NYPD average murder rate from 2002-16: 5.81; 2. Miami average murder rate from 2002-16: 16.67; 3. Chicago average murder rate from 2002-16: 17.85; 4. Los Angeles average murder rate from 2002-16: 9.86; 5. Ahome Mexico; 6. Philadelphia average murder rate from 2002-16: 21.13; 7. Baltimore average murder rate from 2002-16: 40.45;

The Top 5 Most Corrupt U.S. Police Officers Of All-Time 1. Robert Gisevius, Kenneth Bowen, and Anthony Villavaso, New Orleans; 2. Jon Burge, Chicago; 3. David Mack And Rafael Perez, LAPD Rampart division; 4. Joseph Miedzianowski, Chicago; 5. Louis Eppolito and Stephen Caracappa, NYPD;

The Plight of the Police Whistleblower 06/18/2020

10 Most Corrupt Police Force in the World 07/0/2020 1. Kenya; 2. Burma; 3. Iraq; 4. Somalia; 5. Afghanistan; 6. Sudan; 7. Russia; 8. Pakistan; 9. Haiti; 10. Mexico;

6 Corrupt Police Forces That Didn't Even Pretend to Give A F 04/16/2016

Police Integrity Lost: A Study of Law Enforcement Officers Arrested April 2016 Surprisingly little is known about the crimes committed by law enforcement officers, in part because there are virtually no official nationwide data collected, maintained, disseminated, and/or available for research analyses. Researchers have utilized other methodologies to study police misconduct and crime in the absence of any substantive official data, including surveys, field studies, quasi-experiments, internal agency records, and the investigative reports of various independent commissions delegated to report on this phenomenon within particular jurisdictions.

4 US cities among world’s most violent in 2015 01/29/2016

Defund the Police Is a Good Slogan but Bad Policy 06/05/2020 Written by economist, citing two vague studies that don't address other social causes.

USING TERROR ALERT LEVELS TO ESTIMATE THE EFFECT OF POLICE ON CRIME* 02/16/2005 He found that police presence increased in mayoral and gubernatorial election years but not in off-election years.

Using Electoral Cycles in Police Hiring to Estimate the Effects of Police on Crime: Reply 07/0/2020

How New Orleans police went from ‘most corrupt’ to model force 02/26/2019

Marshall Project latest stories on police corruption.

Massachusetts detective fired after post supporting Black Lives Matter 07/02/2020

Springfield police fire detective after pro-Black Lives Matter post 07/01/2020 Earlier this spring, the Springfield Police Department, which was struggled with staffing issues, also faced criticism for reinstating five suspended officers who were criminally charged for an off-duty brawl outside a bar. The department also still employs Anthony Bedinelli, a twice-fired officer — whose terminations were both overturned on appeal — who has been the subject of 18 separate internal investigations during his career, including for alleged physical incidents while on and off duty. But as MassLive reported last month, Bedinelli was recently passed over for a promotion.

Whistleblower Stripped Of Joliet Police Powers: Sources 07/06/2020

In a city known for violence, Detroit protests have not been marred by arson, looting, destruction 07/09/2020

Federal oversight forced reforms on Detroit's often violent police department 07/09/2020

BlueLeaks Hack Exposes Personal Data of 700,000 Cops 07/15/2020

Leaked Documents Show Police Knew Far-Right Extremists Were the Real Threat at Protests, not “Antifa” 07/15/2020

Cop who threatened to kill protesters shoots, kills colleague who knocked on door, affidavit says 07/14/2020

Chilling Video Shows Police Shoot, Kill TV Crewman While Filming Episode of 'COPS' 04/27/2018

Cops Who Laughed as They Killed Handcuffed, Innocent Man Granted Qualified Immunity 07/10/2020





President Obama Signs Indefinite Detention Bill Into Law | American Civil Liberties Union 12/31/2011

Evidence shows Portland police working with federal officers at protests, contradicting city officials 07/18/2020

Obama Signs NDAA Martial Law ∞ Justifying why U have no Rights? 01/02/2012

Dems' Sternly Worded Letter Won't Stop Fascism 07/20/2020

Columbus ‘paramilitary’ police with assault weapons jump out of unmarked vans to abduct protester 06/25/2020

Federal Law Enforcement Use Unmarked Vehicles To Grab Protesters Off Portland Streets 07/16/2020

From ex-cop to exile: Former police officer flees US after exposing crimes in his department 07/18/2018

Jury awards $75K to woman who sued PBSO over excessive force 01/20/2015

Arbitrator orders fired Palm Beach County sheriff’s deputy to be reinstated, possible $150,000 in back pay 04/09/2013

PBC deputy brags about roughing up people on Facebook 08/06/2009

Calls are growing to defund police in the US. Here are some lessons from overseas 06/24/2020 Many of the US police departments facing defunding calls are accused of systemic racism. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) alleges that departments in New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Boston and Detroit reserve their most aggressive enforcement for Black people living in deprived areas.

Here's how much money goes to police departments in largest cities across the U.S. 06/26/2020

Trump’s Justice Department has a powerful tool to fight police abuse. It refuses to use it. 06/30/2020

Study finds police officers arrested 1,100 times per year, or 3 per day, nationwide 06/22/2016

These 35 cops in Wayne County have been deemed untrustworthy to testify in court 07/16/2020

Dozens of Police Officers Across San Diego County Have Been Convicted of Crimes 11/11/2020 By the time sheriff’s deputies arrived at her Imperial Beach home, Deborah Tungcab was lying motionless on the floor. During an argument in 2011, her husband, Roel Tungcab, had broken her cell phone. Through a public records request last year, two reporters from UC Berkeley’s Investigative Reporting Program obtained a list of nearly 12,000 cops and applicants who’d been found guilty of all categories of offenses, ranging from disorderly conduct to sexual assault to manslaughter. The list came from the California Commission on Peace Officers Standards and Training, or POST. In response, California’s top law enforcement officer threatened to take legal action against the reporters if the list wasn’t destroyed. Attorney General Xavier Becerra said it had been released by accident, and he asserted that merely possessing a copy was illegal.

SDPD sergeant accused of soliciting minor for sex found dead from apparent suicide 08/05/2019

Officer accused of DUI apparently kills himself 09/02/2016

Officer Roel Vincente Tungcab, 39, arrested on suspicion of domestic battery 03/29/2011 Tungcab is the second San Diego police officer to be arrested this month. On March 11, traffic officer Anthony Arevalos was taken into custody on suspicion of sexual battery, false imprisonment and assault under the color of authority. ... A San Diego vice detective, Art Perea, 42, resigned from the department March 4 after being placed on unpaid leave after a college student said he raped her at an El Cajon home. Perea has not been charged, and El Cajon police said the incident continues to be investigated.

Wikipedia: Knapp Commission

Wikipedia: Mollen Commission

Check Out Patrolman P, a Tale of Corruption and Murder at the NYPD 11/20/2013

Patrolman P: Film Review 11/16/2013

A Brief History of Cops Convicted of Murder

How a Serial Killer Cop is Still on the Job 07/16/2020 Statistics show white, male officers who politically support gun rights and work in larger cities are more likely to resort to deadly force than their female counterparts, racial and ethnic minorities, and officers who work in smaller communities. Additionally, officers who are military veterans are also more likely to use deadly force as well when compared to non-veterans cops who’ve never fired their gun on duty, according to Pew. Other studies prove that cops shoot people less if they have the right training.

The man believed to have shot the son and husband of New Jersey federal Judge Esther Salas — a lawyer and anti-feminist — has died by suicide 07/20/2020

A controversial legal doctrine protects cops from misconduct lawsuits. Here's how 'qualified immunity' works. 06/08/2020

'Now Is Not the Time for More Studies': Sanders Rips Weak GOP Bill and Demands End to Police Immunity 06/18/2020

Senate passes sweeping police reform bill, limits qualified immunity protections 07/14/2020

Supreme Court Fortifies Qualified Immunity for Law Enforcement Officers in Warrant Cases 2013





Wednesday, July 15, 2020

Oligarchy Now Worse Than Machiavelli



I'm no fan of Niccolò Machiavelli who was a leading adviser for tyrants writing books that taught them how to control their people long after he was dead; however, even he knew how to handle the recent protests against the police than our leaders, and especially the McCloskeys who pointed guns at protesters in a paranoid effort to allegedly defend their home.

Machiavelli wrote about how to control people, teaching that it's better to be feared than loved, that rulers should keep the citizens poor, that they should use war and fear of the enemy to stir up emotions, and many other indoctrination tactics that politicians continue using today. Machiavelli, may be taught in colleges, where political scientists study how to manipulate the masses for the benefit of campaign contributors, although they wouldn't phrase it that way; but it's rarely taught to working class people who often have no more than a high school education, or if they study a trade afterwards, it wouldn't involve studying political manipulation.

If you Google "Niccolò Machiavelli misunderstood" you'll find plenty of people arguing that Machiavelli wasn't nearly as bad as most people in the academic world think, often claiming that his less famous books, including the "Discourses" show that he supported the people in a fair way. This includes one article which seems to argue that Machiavelli was trying to warn us, not advise the tyrants, which sounds good, but was never implemented in practice.

After reading Machiavelli, there's no doubt that if the masses understood the tactics used to control them they would be far less likely to fall for them and would learn how to overthrow the minority that controls large institutions; however, Machiavelli's work wasn't shared with the masses when he was alive, his most famous book, "The Prince," wasn't published until five years after his death, and even then the vast majority of commoners almost certainly couldn't read. Today, even though it's publicly available to anyone that wants to read it, it's hardly taught at all to the working class, while those studying politics often learn it well, yet they rarely discuss it publicly.

One thing that he did get right, although, possibly for the wrong reasons, was that he argued against the building of fortresses, which could also be applied to modern gated communities, where members of the ruling class often live, so they don't have to deal with high rates of violence at home, that might result from their bad policies. Mayor Lyda Krewson, Mark and Patricia McCloskey, could have learned from this. The McCloskeys go beyond being ignorant of some of Machiavelli's teaching, and appear to be paranoid and delusional, assuming they're not putting on a bizarre act for some reason, as this article shows:

Gun-Toting St. Louis Lawyer Claims He Feared ‘Storming Of The Bastille’-Type Attack From Protesters 06/29/2020

Over the weekend, a St. Louis couple drew national attention after they were captured on video pointing guns at anti-racist protesters marching past their house in the Missouri city’s affluent Central West End neighborhood.

Mark McCloskey, who was armed with an assault rifle in the now-viral video, recently sat down with NBC News affiliate KSDK to share his reasons for pointing the lethal weapon at the protesters.

During the interview, the St. Louis attorney claimed he and his wife feared for their lives.

“We were threatened with our lives, threatened with our house being burned down, my office building being burned down, even our dog’s life being threatened. It was, it was about as bad as it can get.”

“I mean…I really thought it was Storming the Bastille, that we would be dead and the house would be burned and there was nothing we could do about it.”

“It was a huge and frightening crowd.” Complete article


This protest was all caught on video, including the fact that the gate was open, despite claims that the protesters broke it. It was broken later, although it's unclear why, or if it was a bad attempt to support the false claim. Many of these claims were clearly proven false shortly after they made them, raising major credibility problems. according to 'They were going to kill us': Armed St. Louis homeowner claims protesters threatened to take her life and home 07/07/2020 they also made additional claims about another protest five days later that also seem to have major credibility problems:
"We got a tip that the people were coming back, and they were coming back specifically for us and to get us and to burn the house," Mark McCloskey said. "And so we started trying to get private security. We had been told that the city police have been ordered to stand down. We had been told that there was going to be no official help. Our neighborhood association put out a flier saying that, if people broke in, they were just going to let them. And so we started trying to hire private security. Entity after entity said they didn’t want to get involved. Thursday afternoon, we started hiding valuables and securing the house. The last group of security people ... these were special forces guys, told us they couldn’t do it and we should just walk away from the house and abandon it. We just said we weren’t going to do that."

This was nothing like the storming of the Bastille, as he claimed, and he should have known it; furthermore, if it was, I seriously doubt if they would have reacted that way; and if they did, and they were actually up against violent and armed protesters, as they falsely claimed, there's a strong chance that they would have been killed quickly. But of course, the protesters were peaceful, and some of them were demanding that funds be shifted from police to social programs that are far more effective at reducing violence before it escalates, instead of dealing with it when it's too late.

The McCloskeys, on the other hand don't seemed to be interested in the leading causes of violence so they can prevent it at all, instead they're constantly bickering with people and starting arguments, which began long before this incident. According to Police execute search warrant at home of gun-toting couple 07/11/2020 "that public records and interviews show the McCloskeys are almost always in conflict with others, typically over control of private property."

Neither the McCloskeys or Lyda Krewson seem to know much about the leading causes of violence, and how to prevent it, which could make their city much safer, and reduce the need for them to live in gated communities. This shouldn't be too surprising, since the best research on leading causes of violence is almost completely absent from traditional media, and rarely discussed when making political decisions, unless local people do their own research and bring it up despite the negligence of media and politicians. More on that below. Machiavelli wasn't familiar with some of the best modern research on preventing violence either, and his political views are more likely to do the opposite in many cases, like the policies of many modern authoritarian politicians; however, he understood that rulers who lived in fortresses or gated communities were less likely to respect the rights of their own people, as indicated int the following excerpts:

Niccolò Machiavelli "Discourses" That, commonly, Fortresses do much more Harm than Good. 1517

Looking, therefore, to the course followed by the Romans in this particular, and to that adopted by our modern rulers, it seems proper to consider whether or not it is advisable to build fortresses, and whether they are more likely to help or to hurt him who builds them In the first place, then, we are to remember that fortresses are built either as a defense against foreign foes or against subjects.

In the former case, I pronounce them unnecessary, in the latter mischievous. And to state the reasons why in the latter case they are mischievous, I say that when princes or republics are afraid of their subjects and in fear lest they rebel, this must proceed from knowing that their subjects hate them, which hatred in its turn results from their own ill conduct, and that again from their thinking themselves able to rule their subjects by mere force, or from their governing with little prudence.

Now one of the causes which lead them to suppose that they can rule by mere force, is this very circumstance of their people having these fortresses on their backs So that the conduct which breeds hatred is itself mainly occasioned by these princes or republics being possessed of fortresses, which, if this be true, are really far more hurtful than useful First, because, as has been said already, they render a ruler bolder and more violent in his bearing towards his subjects, and, next, because they do not in reality afford him that security which he believes them to give For all those methods of violence and coercion which may be used to keep a people under, resolve themselves into two; since either like the Romans you must always have it in your power to bring a strong army into the field, or else you must dissipate, destroy, and disunite the subject people, and so divide and scatter them that they can never again combine to injure you.

For should you merely strip them of their wealth, spoliatis arma supersunt, arms still remain to them, or if you deprive them of their weapons, furor arma ministrat, rage will supply them, if you put their chiefs to death and continue to maltreat the rest, heads will renew themselves like those Hydra; while, if you build fortresses, these may serve in time of peace to make you bolder in outraging your subjects, but in time of war they will prove wholly useless, since they will be attacked at once by foes both foreign and domestic, whom together it will be impossible for you to resist. ......

But to go deeper into the matter, I say, either you are a prince seeking by means of these fortresses to hold the people of your city in check; or you are a prince, or it may be a republic, desirous to control some city which you have gained in war. To the prince I would say, that, for the reasons already given, nothing can be more unserviceable than a fortress as a restraint upon your subjects, since it only makes you the readier to oppress them, and less scrupulous how you do so; while it is this very oppression which moves them to destroy you, and so kindles their hatred, that the fortress, which is the cause of all the mischief, is powerless to protect you.

A wise and good prince, therefore, that he may continue good, and give no occasion or encouragement to his descendants to become evil, will never build a fortress, to the end that neither he nor they may ever be led to trust to it rather than to the good-will of their subjects. And if Francesco Sforza, who was accounted a wise ruler, on becoming Duke of Milan erected a fortress in that city, I say that herein he was unwise, and that the event has shown the building of this fortress to have been hurtful and not helpful to his heirs.

For thinking that by its aid they could behave as badly as they liked to their citizens and subjects, and yet be secure, they refrained from no sort of violence or oppression, until, becoming beyond measure odious, they lost their State as soon as an enemy attacked it. Nor was this fortress, which in peace had occasioned them much hurt, any defense or of any service them in war. For had they being without it, through thoughtlessness, treated their subjects inhumanely, they must soon have discovered and withdrawn from their danger; and might, thereafter, with no other help than that of attached subjects, have withstood the attacks of the French far more successfully than they could with their fortress, but with subjects whom they had estranged. Complete article


The short version of what Machiavelli was recognizing was that if the rulers lived in fortresses, or gated communities, where they wouldn't be held accountable for the results of their policies. In his time, there were no democracies, but he warned that if they oppressed the people too much, they would revolt. He also cautioned that if the rulers were behind gated communities they would be more likely to encourage their troops, or now police, to be more brutal, and inspire revolt. Furthermore, with politicians, like Lyda Krewson live in gated communities and have police protection when they leave, they're less likely to be concerned about their own safety, possibly ignoring the best research for political reasons, including some encouraged by Machiavelli, like keeping the citizens poor. Not that I, or most peaceful protesters are recommending that Lyda Krewson should be put at risk, but neither should the rest of the community when we have the research to understand how to reduce violence.

Many of the cities that have had the biggest problems with police brutality over the last few years, including St. Louis, Baltimore, Philadelphia and Chicago have seen their homicide rates increase significantly, while most of the country was relatively unchanged hitting an all time low of 4.5 per 100,000 in 2013 and 2014, before climbing back up to 5.4 in 2016, and dropping back to 5.0 again in 2018, but the increases in these four cities were much higher. One city, Richmond, California, which I covered years ago in Politicians increase crime; Grass roots efforts reduce crime; Politicians steal the credit, has seen it's murder rates drop dramatically, perhaps the sharpest drop of any other city, at least that I know of. Part of the reason for this was police reform, but they also dressed many of the leading root causes with lots of activism at the local level, and for a while they had one of the few Green Party Mayors in the country, with much more progressive policies than other cities. They went from being one of the most violent cities in the country, with a rate peaking above 45 per 100,000 to cutting their murder rates by 75%, in 2014 and 2017, although they had a couple bad years in 2016 and 2018, which were still 60% below their peak.

New Orleans La. and Camden NJ also had very high murder rates and responded with major police reform, which helped reduce violence and those cities dramatically. All three of these cities still have serious crime problems, but they've shown that hey can do much better, and if they continue their reforms they can be expected to get even better.

We actually do have good research that shows how to solve this problem without resorting to oppressive police, which has proven to fail.

When it comes to one major contributing cause after another, there's a clear difference between the research showing how to reduce violence, and a rigged economic ideology, designed to benefit the wealthy, that often live in the gated communities, or estates that have as much if not more security, and are out of touch with the working class. One of the most obvious contributing factors to high rates of crime and violence, that opposes fiscal ideology of the wealthy, is poverty and income inequality, which go together. Wealthy people often talk about how they want to reduce poverty and income inequality, but they rarely ever do so, presumably because they're the beneficiaries of it, so they have a financial incentive not to solve it.

Another major contributing factor, possibly the most important one, is early child abuse, including corporal punishment leading to escalating violence later in life. This teaches blind obedience and to resort to violence to solve problems. Wealthy people may often support it, especially for the working class because this is a major part of a punitive process that keeps them in their place. Most major cities, including St. Louis have banned the use of corporal punishment in schools; however, Missouri is one of the 19 remaining states still allowing it, and abandoned inn er cities, like St. Louis have more than their share of other contributing factors, which is why they tend to be so violent.

Improved access to education is also a major part of the solution, but there's little or no effort from the political establishment to solve this problem, including from Mayor Lyda Krewson, and they often do the opposite b y pushing Charter Schools, often for profit, especially in low income areas, even though they've been a proven failure. Her son is apparently pushing them, as a former member of Teach For America, which is actually a propaganda organization attempting to privatize education. Supposedly his support doesn't involve his mother; however, a search of her record certainly doesn't show strong opposition to Charters Schools, if anything her record seems to show subtle support for them, even though those well informed about them know how bad they've failed. There's also evidecne that they're pushing them the most in some of the poorest and most violent cities in the country as I pointed out in Is Push For Charter Schools Increasing Murder Rates? and these Charter Schools aren't doing anything to reduce violence in the sixteen most heavily concentrated cities cited by one source in that article, with some of them getting even worse. The closet thing to an exception is New Orleans, which was on top of the list in 2014, but has gone through some major reforms in the last few years, including police reform, and a growing recognition that Charter Schools have failed miserably. New Orleans was an early leader in Charter Schools and while they were still expanding their violence rate was still on the rise.

According to Lyda Krewson's Wikipedia page she doesn't seem to be a leader in progressive reforms, although in a few cases she may have compromised with her critics who seemed far more familiar with the best research to reduce violence. She tried to reduce panhandling by introducing the "REAL Change Program" but it also criminalized panhandling and there was some doubt as to how effective her social program was. She seemed more concerned, like many other politicians with preventing the annoyance to the public, than to solving the homeless problem. She also increased the number of beds for homeless by 50 but it was in response to the closing of an Evangelistic homeless shelter which previously housed 150. I've written previously about how much higher the rates of murder are in cities with Megachurches in or near them compared to those without them; however, most of these megachurches collect an enormous amount of money from parishioners and use little or none of it for social programs that help the community, often buying mansions, limousines, and even private airplanes, for wealthy pastors. I'm not a fan of religion, but if they do provide social services some of them may help the community.

Krewson was also slow to address the root causes of violence, until pressured by community activists. She hasn't supported nearly as comprehensive reforms as Richmond Ca. Camden NJ, or New Orleans La., which have all proven to have major success and included police reform among other things; however under pressure she did sign a contract with Cure Violence last year, which is just getting started. Based on research from 2000 to 2004 in Chicago they concluded this was very effective and it was also introduced to Baltimore; however they only expanded it to 15 out of 77 Chicago communities, and both Baltimore and Chicago have seen increases in crime in recent years, strongly implying that either it's not as effective as the reforms in Richmond, Camden and New Orleans, or they're not providing enough resources for it. It's too soon to know how effective it will be in St. Louis.

There's good reason to believe that mainstream media and establishment politicians, including Lyda Krewson are far more concerned with the fiscal ideology of the elites than with the most effective research, which is available at libraries, alternative media and academic journals. The evidence for this is incredibly simple; the mainstream media practically never mentions this good research, and establishment politicians are constantly ignoring it as well, unless they face strong opposition at the local level. As I pointed out, in previous articles on the subject, the communities that have strongest grassroots movements pushing good research are the ones that get the most concessions, occasionally, like Richmond California, they even manage to elect progressive politicians like Gayle McLaughlin, who was Mayor during the most important reforms and even help corporations like Chevron accountable, to the best of her ability, and she helped bring about the most effective reforms reducing violence in cities with exceptionally high murder rates. The closest possible exception, that I know of, might be New York, which also had a dramatic drop in murder rates, but that took much longer dropping slowly, but steadily over a period of over 25 years.

When politicians are isolated from their communities, and have little or no contact with the best researchers, they're far more likely to push the fiscal ideology of wealthy elites, who are far more concerned with their own wealth and power than the best interests of the community. these politicians rarely seem to get advice about good research from their political allies, instead getting it from outspoken and well informed community members, and often resist implementing good policies even then. The same goes for wealthy owners, often billionaires, of the media and celebrity pundits, often multi-millionaires, who ignore the best research, and also live apart from the community.



Another problem with gated communities, is although they reduce burglaries within the community, they do nothing to reduce overall crime and they're very inefficient. Studies have shown that in addition to being more expensive, they also cost much more to maintain and pay for high security, so they're only for very wealthy people. Furthermore, other studies have shown that even though they reduce burglaries, they may lead to increases in bullying, domestic violence and other forms of violence, partly because the victims are fenced in with their attackers, and have no where to turn.

And more importantly, when the elites feel they're protected they might feel more comfortable ignoring far more effective ways of reducing all forms of violence and burglaries for everyone, not just those living in the gated communities. If this had been done decades ago the demand for gated communities never would have grown so high; and if we addressed the leading causes of violence then demand for gated communities would steadily drop, as crime rates fall. The McCloskeys clearly demonstrated that some of the people in these gated communities are ideological fanatics, and out of touch with reality. There's no way of knowing how many more residents of these communities are like that, but our political establishment routinely fights tooth and nail against policies that are based on rational research, indicating there are many more.

We could also compare our country to the rest of the world to understand why some countries have much more violence than us, and other countries have much less violence. Compared to other wealthy countries, ours is one of the most violent countries in the world; however if you compare us to all countries including poorer ones, often with extremely dysfunctional governments, many supported by our government, we're moderately below average for murder rates, but much safer than the most dysfunctional countries. In some of these dysfunctional governments, they also rely heavily on gated communities to protect the wealthy that have the most political influence, including Mexico and Argentina:

Research in Urban Sociology 2010 - Page 285

The local Councillor of a municipality in the province of Mendoza, Argentina, explains the local situation: there is not a general norm for gated communities, so there are exception ordinances to build this type of neighborhood … each situation is analyzed and gets a planning permit.’ In the case of Queretaro, some gated communities do not have a municipal permit to be closed off, but there does not seem to be opposition about this because their residents are part of the political or economic elite of the city. As the local deputy planning director explains: People who live there [referring to EC4] are politicians and government people who have managed to keep the development as private, even when we all know that it should work as an open neighborhood.’

In relation to gated community residents, they are not only seen as ’politicians’ as stated in the previous quotation, but also as ’people with money … with large houses of 300 square metres or even 500 square metres and they usually have people who help them with the house cleaning.’ (deputy director of urban development, Queretaro, Mexico) Additional excerpts


Both these countries are more violent and dysfunctional than the United States, especially Mexico; and the problem is the same, the people making the political decisions are isolated from the rest of the community and base their decisions on fiscal ideology, designed to control the masses, not the most effective research to reduce violence or the best interests of the majority of the people.

Switzerland, on the other hand, is one of the countries with much lower murder rates 0.59 compared to 5.0 for the United States, more than eight times as high, and some of the worst abandoned inner cities in the United States are a hundred times more violent than Switzerland.

Paying Our High Public Officials 2013 p.101

The success of Switzerland is based upon the fact that political affairs are run by people who are grounded in reality and know the needs of the people from their own experiences.

Instead of making it possible for ordinary workers to enter politics, the salaries have created an increasing distance between the experiences of ordinary workers and those of successful career politicians.

For if high public officials are paid moderately, they will live under circumstances similar to those that the people they govern live under. Hence they will have similar experiences, and this will ensure that they remain in touch. If, on the other hand, high public officials are paid too well, they will live under conditions that are much more luxurious than those that the people they govern live under, and consequently have no idea what their lives are like. This will make them out of touch. To put it bluntly, high public officials should not live in gated communities, be driven around in chauffeured cars, and never visit a supermarket. They will have no idea what life is like for the common people, and this makes them bad high public officials. Additional excerpts


The living like common people argument for public officials, can be part of the solution, but of course it's also important to share the most effective research about causes of violence with both politicians and the public, which our media doesn't do. I don't know if they do better in Switzerland or over a dozen other wealthy countries with a fifth of the rates of violence we have, and many more countries with less than half our rates of violence. Many of these countries provide better education, child care, social programs that address root causes of violence, universal health care, and many other policies, that our leaders denounce as Socialism, despite the fact that our country is constantly bailing out Wall Street, which is Corporate Socialism, and providing enormous amount of funds for wars based on lies, and a massive prison industrial complex that does little or nothing to rehabilitate people or reduce crime. There's no doubt that if we shifted funds for these wars based on lies, massive prisons, and militarized police to social programs that are far more effective reducing violence, we could reduce our rates of violence as low, or perhaps even lower than many of the European countries that are already responding to the best research on the subject.

Rachel Kleinfeld, author of "A Savage Order" makes a similar argument in her article, Why Are Some Societies So Violent, and Can They Be Made Safe? 11/19/2018, where she writes, "The real question, I realized, wasn’t how to fight violence—it was how to get a corrupt government to want to do so." She writes mostly about governments that are even more dysfunctional than our own, but this also applies to our government. There should be no doubt that if our politicians wanted to fight violence, they would be far more willing to listen to the best researchers on the subject and their own constituents, some of whom are already seeking out these research, which is absent from the media.

She also explores violence in countries which are supposedly democratic pointing out "Some people blame democracy itself for violence. But why wouldn’t governments that supposedly answer to voters do a better job of protecting their citizens? I wanted to understand what was happening." She does point out that many of these so-called democracies are partly corrupted; but I'll go one step further, they often don't have the basic functions of a democracy, and therefore aren't really democratic at all. A democracy is where they are governed with the informed consent of the people, which means that we need access to the educational material to make decisions, which we don't, partly because the media ignores the most effective research to reduce violence, and because working class people don't have nearly as good access to quality schools, as a result of our method of funding them with property taxes.

If we want to become a real democracy, we have to have a far more diverse media that is willing to cover the most important research on many different subjects, including how to reduce violence. This media also has to cover all candidates for political office, not just the ones supported by Wall Street, enabling honest politicians to get name recognition needed to be viable, and explain their positions to the public. As it is now, a fraction of 1% of the wealthiest people, control well over 90% of the media and they only cover candidates they support to get name recognition, ensuring we have politicians that don't respond to the people or the best research. Until we rectify the control of the interview process, this won't change or as Rachel Kleinfeld says, "As long as politicians aren’t giving violent people impunity or encouraging repressive, predatory police, societies that maintain cohesion can stay peaceful even with a weak, poor state."



The following are some related articles or sources:

Ignored evidence linking corporal punishment, poverty and crime grows

How much does Income Inequality Affects Crime Rates?

Does lack of education increase violent crime? Religion?

Research On Preventing Violence Absent From National Media

Politicians increase crime; Grass roots efforts reduce crime; Politicians steal the credit

How New Orleans police went from ‘most corrupt’ to model force 02/26/2019

Murder rate down in New Orleans for third consecutive year 01/01/2020

In New Orleans, a 47-year low in killings -- and that's no accident, police chief says 12/31/2018

Camden's Police Overhaul Offers a Complicated Precedent 06/19/2020

Wealthy St. Louis lawyers point guns at peaceful protesters 06/29/2020

McCloskey Couple Who Pointed Guns at Protesters Release Statement in Support of Protesters 06/29/2020

Mark McCloskey & Patricia McCloskey: St. Louis Couple Pull Guns on Protesters 06/30/2020

Lawyer-couple who pointed guns at protesters are Black Lives Matter backers, Democrats and represent a police brutality victim. 06/29/2020

Lawyers who confronted protestors with guns are being investigated 06/29/2020 Patricia McCloskey’s biography on her website says she is on the Missouri Bar Association’s Ethical Review Board.

St. Louis Cops Seize Gun That Couple Pointed At Black Lives Matter Protesters 07/11/2020

2019 homicide total is second-highest of decade for St. Louis 01/01/2020

Corporal Punishment Eliminated 11/12/1981

Seattle City Council Pledges to Cut Police Budget in Half 07/10/2020

Wikipedia: Lyda Krewson mayor of St. Louis, Missouri.

Central West End couple explains why they pointed guns at protesters who demanded Krewson's resignation 06/29/2020

Wikipedia: Disposition Matrix

Wikipedia: Bilal Abdul Kareem

US: American Journalist Has No Right To Challenge Decision To Assassinate Him 07/07/2020

How do the Democrats running for president really live? A look at their homes, wealth. 08/24/2019

Did These Politicians Build Walls Around Their Homes? 01/04/2019

Senate busts open gated communities for politicians 02/24/2014

Risk of crime in gated communities 03/20/2013 Crucially, the authors emphasize that people living in gated communities may be at greater risk of other crimes, such as intimate partner violence, bullying, or violent assault in or near the home, because the victim is "locked in" with the offender.

How Fancy 'Gated' Communities Can Make Cities More Violent 01/27/2015

Gated Communities and Crime in the United States 11/30/2017

Gated Communities and Crime in the United States 2017 PDF

Burglary in Gated and Non-Gated Communities 02/04/2013

Lyda Krewson Net Worth: Below $1 million in 2018 above $1 million in 2019 two years after becoming Mayor

Study Shows Homes in Gated Communities Command Higher Prices but Cost of Amenities May Outweigh Their Benefits 06/30/2016

The federal government created inner-city ghettos with racist housing regulations 07/18/2017

Baltimore Is a Mess. Here Are 3 Big Issues the City Faces. 08/05/2019

Wikipedia: List of countries by intentional homicide rate

The Evolution of Gated Communities





Tuesday, July 7, 2020

Is New Research Showing Fringe Alien Hybrids Are Possible?



The claim that there are alien hybrids have always been science fiction, or if UFO researchers made such a claim, even some with PhDs, then they always had serious credibility problems. Rushing to believe these claims would be clearly irrational, for now.

Typically there's almost always serious flaws on both sides of high profile discussions of this subject, at least if they go beyond the basic facts of various incidents. One of the highest profile examples where a UFO researcher claims he has what he considers solid evidence of alien human hybrids is David M. Jacobs, who has been writing about it for decades before going into retirement recently. Seth Shostak reviews someone who is still lecturing based on Jacobs teachings in Space aliens are breeding with humans, university instructor says. Scientists say otherwise. 05/25/2019 which refuters claims by Young-hae Chi and Jacobs, and seems far more credible than David Jacobs, especially when considering some of Jacobs back ground. In one of Jacobs books he makes a point of saying that he doesn't try to review the same memories twice; however, there was one exception where he accidentally did and retrieved memories under hypnosis that contradicted a previous session. Instead of speculating about the probability that at least some memories based on hypnosis might be false memories, he dismisses it with a weak defense and declines to double check any of the memories he's retrieving. His PhD. is in history not psychiatry or psychology, and he uses these hypnotic sessions to draw far fetched conclusions, which have serious credibility problems.

Even though Seth Shostak seems far more credible most of the time, he also makes his share of obvious blunders, which he should have caught. One of these may be the claim that "polls indicate that up to 6 percent of Americans claim to have been abducted by" aliens with a link to Why alien abductions are down dramatically 06/12/2016 which actually says "one in 25 respondents believed they’d been abducted by aliens," which comes to 4% the 6% reference was for people who "reported experiencing a hallucination unrelated to drugs, alcohol, or sleep," not abduction. There are few if any reliable polls about people who have been abducted, but I've seen a few, although 4% would be higher than any other I've heard of. A Washington Post poll comparing alien abductions to voter fraud claims 2.5% of people claim to have been abducted, which is the second highest I've heard of, although this doesn't seem to be the most credible either, and they assume that some people may have rushed through the survey. Perhaps a more credible report I've heard of comes from Is it normal to believe you have been abducted by aliens? July 2019 which says, "The prevalence of these beliefs is unknown, but estimates vary from ‘at least several thousand worldwide’,4 to 3.7 million in American alone.5" The high end of this estimate is just over 1%, and the source she cites is Jacobs and Bud Hopkins, who aren't the most credible ones, the lower end is about one in a million people claiming to be abducted, and comes from a more skeptical source. Seth Shostak seems to have picked the highest estimate and exaggerated it even more, which isn't very scientific.

Seth Shostak showed his bias even more in the end of UFO Files - The Day After Roswell (part 2 of 2) Season 2, Episode 6 first aired in 2005 (For first half see UFO Files - The Day After Roswell (part 1 of 2) Season 2, Episode 6 first aired in 2005) when he says, "Some people think that, for example, aliens intervened in 3500 BCE in Egypt to help build the pyramids. Well you know doggone it the Egyptians were perfectly capable of putting big blocks on top of other big blocks right? If the Egyptians had suddenly developed cell phones then I would say OK there's intervention there but that's not what they did." This claim is factually flawed, for starters the official date that the pyramids were made is closer to 2,500 BCE, which is a trivial mistake; more importantly, experiments have shown that his shouldn't have been possible with technology available to ancient civilizations.

I went into this more in 107 Wonders of the Ancient World which explains that ancient civilizations moved millions of multi-ton megaliths all over the world, including thousands over fifty tons, at least a hundred or so over one hundred tons, and more than half a dozen of those were over seven hundred tons, including the Colossi of Memnon, which weigh 720 tons and were transported 420 miles, to a slightly higher altitude. Yet experiments to move these with ancient technology only succeeded up to ten tons without cheating and with an enormous amount of effort; more experiments between ten and forty tons cheated to get the megaliths on the sledges that they tried to pull with a lot of people, and still only managed to inch them forward short distances. These experiments had enormous problems with breaking sledges and ropes. They didn't even try anything bigger, and even with modern technology it's incredibly difficult, implying ancients had a much better ability to move these megaliths.

This doesn't provide direct evidence to the theory that aliens are creating hybrids, of course; however, it does prove that there's a major unsolved mystery about our social evolution, that enabled them to move massive megaliths that should have been able to move. One possible explanation might be that they were influenced by an unknown advanced intelligence of some sort. The Ancient Aliens show and many other theorists think this might provide evidence to support their claims, however many more details need to be filled in; and the History Channel rarely does a good job doing that.

However, even though experiments still haven't replicated the methods presumably used to move ancient megaliths with primitive technology, there's a growing amount of evidence from traditional scientists showing manipulating the genes or DNA of various animals, perhaps even creating hybrids is possible. Twenty-three years ago scientist made the news with a story that went viral, for a while, about a mouse with an ear on his back. They claimed they were trying to learn how to help recreate human limbs. This apparently did not lead to the creation of human limbs, nor did it involve introducing human DNA and creating a hybrid. However, there have been numerous other stories that did enable them to recreate ears, or introduce human DNA to various animals that didn't get nearly as much attention.

Since then, in addition to improving the ability to recreate ears, using methods unrelated to the ear mouse, they've experimented with Human-Cow Hybrid Embryos, Sheep-Human Hybrids, Human-Pig Hybrid, and much more; however traditional media has hardly covered most of this, ensuring that outside of the scientific community hardly anyone knows about most of the scientific advances that have been going on. This doesn't fit the strictest definition of a conspiracy, since it's not completely secret; however, since it accomplishes the same goal it's very close.

About a year and a half ago scientists published a study, reported in this article, Scientists added human brain genes to monkeys. Yes, it’s as scary as it sounds. 04/12/2019, which discusses and experiment to introduce a human gene, MCPH1, to Rhesus macaque monkeys and described some of the results:
Of the 11 transgenic macaque monkeys they generated, six died. The five survivors went through a series of tests, including MRI brain scans and memory tests. It turned out they didn’t have bigger brains than a control group of macaques, but they did perform better on short-term memory tasks. Their brains also developed over a longer period of time, which is typical of human brains.

The article and related study discus how this gene makes humans more advanced than other primates, and how it developed in our own evolution, which means this experiment may help them understand the evolutionary process better, as well as how to manipulate it. Another news report came out within the last few weeks, Human brain size gene triggers bigger brain in monkey fetus 06/18/2020, which discusses another experiment to introduce another human gene, ARHGAP11B, into marmoset monkeys, which they sucessfully did, to but aborted the fetuses after 101 days, 50 days before the normal birth of a marmoset monkey and examined their brains finding out that it resulted in an enlarged brain for the marmosets, unlike the macaques, which still had improved memory as a result of the gene introduced to them. This experiment was done in Japan which may have what tehy consider higher ethical standards than China, although I'm not sure they adequately explain their ethical choices. A researcher, Wieland Huttner, says:
"To let them come to be born, in my opinion, would have been irresponsible as a first step, because you don't know what kind of behavioral change you'll get."

This may be true, but it implies that they consider it ethical to introduce the gene to the fetus, for the sake of science, but not to allow it to live. Most ethical guidelines are established by academics, as far as I can tell, yet they don't use themselves for their own genetic research. Those that are used for the research are often not capable of understanding the implications, nor are they likely to share the benefits, assuming there are any benefits. If you read enough research on ethics on the subject including "Medical Apartheid" 2007 and "Deadly Monopolies" 2015 by Harriet Washington, it becomes increasingly clear that one small, wealthy and well educated class of people make the vast majority of the ethical decisions, while animals or a much larger class of poorer and less educated people are used for research.

Not surprisingly, the wealthy people influencing ethical decisions tend to get the vast majority of benefits from the research, while the poorer people get substandard care and often are inadequately compensated to their part in the research, assuming they get any compensation at all. Well informed researchers like Harriet Washington and Marcia Angell author of "The Truth About The Drug Companies" 2005 that try to encourage tougher ethical standards are often overruled by allies of the pharmaceutical and health care industry, and often get much less if any media time to educate the public, especially in mainstream media, although they might get more attention in alternative media.

However, regardless of the ethics, the rapid development of many advanced technologies, including the ability to manipulate DNA and create hybrids with different animals or humans is chipping away at one of the arguments that might have been used twenty years ago against the possibility of alien manipulation of our DNA and the creation of human-alien hybrids, or even that they might have manipulated our DNA thousands if not millions of years ago. The argument that this couldn't have happened because it's simply not possible is much weaker that it used to be, since scientists are rapidly proving it just might be possible.

Furthermore, even though rational skeptics would still be justified to claim that UFO researchers still haven't provided hard evidence to show that aliens have been visiting for thousands of years and that they're sharing technology with our government and many corporations, there is enough evidence to narrow it down to two possibilities, generally speaking, and the alternative may be just as far-fetched, once you look at the evidence, assuming you do look at the evidence. Philip Corso, author of "The Day After Roswell," is one of the most credible and best known alleged whistle-blowers claiming that he helped share alien technology with corporations around the world, although even he has a few credibility problems; but there are many more. Richard M. Dolan is one of the more credible researchers and covers some more people claiming that reverse-engineering is going on in UFOs and the National Security State: The Cover-Up Exposed, 1973-1991 2009; although, he doesn't try to present this evidence as conclusive, which is reasonable, considering the information he has available. However, if you review these sources, and more, then it becomes clear that either there is something to their claims; or there's a massive effort, within the UFO community to make it seem as if there is.

Bob Lazar was another alleged whistle blower that claimed he worked with alien technology in 1989, about eight years before Corso's claims. In May of 1989, he made his claims anonymously, then appeared under his own name in November 1989; and it didn't take long for many people to raise major doubts ab out his credibility. However, he claimed that they used element 115 as a stable fuel for their crafts, at a time when there were only 109 known elements. This element wasn't synthesized until 2003; and it wasn't widely recognized until 2015. Many believe that he had to have inside knowledge to predict it's creation; however, he claimed it was a stable element, yet, to this day they haven't created any stable isotopes that could last more than a fraction of a second.

Boyd Bushman has also provided some disclosures in a bizarre video shortly before he died, Lockheed Martin senior scientist tells all, before he dies. Incredible! 10/24/2014 This was quickly ridiculed by many media outlets, Former Lockheed Martin engineer from Texas: I met aliens at Area 51 10/13/2014, with some degree of justification, including the fact that one of the pictures he holds up, claiming it was an actual alien, turned out to be a doll sold at Walmart. However, he had a much more credible background than Bob Lazar and was a former Lockheed Martin and Texas Instruments engineer, (Boyd Bushman employment history), who had twenty-eight patents for advanced technology. (Patents by Inventor Boyd B. Bushman) Why would a credible engineer manufacture such an absurd story, assuming it's completely false? If it's partially true why would he include obvious blunders like the Walmart doll?

If this was just one or two people telling crazy stories, even if they seemed to have a fair amount of credibility I might dismiss it and doubt if there was anything to it; however, there are thousands of credible witnesses to strange phenomenon, often from very credible people, including police officers, military men, professors, pilots and many more, although most of them don't claim to have direct knowledge of shared technology, or direct contact with the alleged aliens. This is actually quite common in research into UFOs. It may seem easy to claim that it's all just bunk; however these incredibly obvious blunders are often made by the skeptics as well; and there are some legitimate mysteries, like how ancient megaliths were moved, despite experiments that show it shouldn't be possible, indicating that there's something unexplained going on. There are also many other related issues, including thousands of alleged UFO sightings, Crop Circles, Cattle mutilations, other alleged mystical events and much more; in most cases there's extensive amounts of research available, although a lot of it may not be reliable. But it's difficult to completely dismiss all of these mysteries, even if many of them are seriously flawed, assuming you look at the evidence.

However, many so-called skeptics or skeptical organizations decline to look closely at these unsolved mysteries, instead resorting to ridicule or some other distraction tactic; one of the most brazen of these is so-called "RationalWiki" which refers to Boyd Bushman as "batshit crazy," crazy instead of doing a good job reviewing the evidence. Instead of debunking many unsolved mysteries scientifically they routinely make fun of anything they disagree with often claiming that shows like "Ancient Aliens" are unscientific, which is usually partly or mostly true; however, they're no more scientific, and there are often parts of the claims on Ancient Aliens that can be partly if not completely confirmed through independent sources with more credibility. Researchers that try to do this are rare, but high profile skeptics certainly don't do it.

Furthermore, even though Philip Corso didn't claim to share technology about manipulating DNA, if he actually shared any technology there's a good chance that others might have; and some of the technology he claimed to share resembles new technology that continues to advance after his death. In UFO Files - The Day After Roswell (part 1 of 2) Season 2, Episode 6 first aired in 2005 and (part 2 of 2) they discuss a headband that Corso claims to have shared and compare it to implants used by a paralyzed person to control a computer, which was developed after Corso's death. The handicapped person demonstrates his attempt to draw a circle, which wasn't very accurate at all, but in the early days of development the fact that he could partly control the computer was a major advancement. Since then they've improved on this technology even more and now this technology has advanced even more. There have been several articles in the past couple years discussing how these brain implants can now be used to control artificial limbs including Brain implants allow paralysed patients to move limbs 03/05/2018 and Implants enable man to control prosthetics with ‘thoughts’ 10/21/2019

We haven't reached the point where we have the technology to create "The Six Million Dollar Man" or "Darth Vader," nor is any overly dramatic use of advanced technology likely to happen, outside of Hollywood; however, we're coming much closer than most people would have suspected. This is just a small fraction of technological advances that have been escalating since Corso allegedly began sharing it and it has been escalating even more in the last twenty to thirty years.

Most people are unaware with most scientific advantages for the same reason they're unaware about the best research into UFOs or many other unexplained mysteries. Over ninety-five percent of the media is controlled by five corporations, and they hardly provide any diversity in their coverage. There's little or no doubt that if they wanted to fix many of the most obvious blunders from both the UFO theorists that are most inclined to jump to exaggerated conclusions and the skeptics that ignore evidence that doesn't suit their beliefs, they could and would have; leaving me to the conclusion that they may not even trying to do a good job, possibly as part of a cover up.

It's also pretty clear that, either there is an unknown advanced intelligence of some sort behind UFOs and many other unsolved mysteries, or there's a massive effort to make it seem like there is. Skeptics don't even consider this possibility, possibly because if they did then it might turn out to be even more far-fetched than the conspiracy theories they ridicule. Furthermore, if that was the case it still doesn't explain why we have technology developing much faster in recent history than ever before, yet we're doing senseless and idiotic things with it, or how ancient megaliths were moved, and many other things, including anomalies in crop circles like the blown out nodes that can't be replicated.

If there is something to this theory then it may include much more research on many other things, including climate change, weather modification, for other medical reasons including the current pandemic, and past ones like the plague. I covered this previously Were Ancient Aliens Experimenting With Humans during Plague Epidemics? when I pointed out that researchers at the time of the plagues knew little about what caused the worst pandemics and when they ended over three hundred years ago they had no idea why they didn't come back, and modern scholars don't know much more. There have been smaller outbreaks since then, which scholars have been able to study, but this wasn't the same as studying a massive pandemic as it happened, not that they would want to risk that. I also speculated about them researching the current pandemic in Fake Corona-virus Apocalypse?; this was written shortly before the pandemic spiked suddenly, indicating that it wasn't faked, assuming all our news isn't fake.

For one reason or another the second crop circle of the year clearly resembles COVID-19, indicating who ever's making them has expressed an interest. We should be cautious about interpreting riddles like Crop Circles, but I'm not ruling out the possibility that the creators of this might have an interest in it.



In Why so few arrests for Crop Circles makers? Is there microwave evidence? I pointed out that many of these Crop Circles have characteristics that can't be explained away easily like blown out nodes. A video pointed out to me since then also describes this characteristic and more, Why Crop Circles Are NOT Man Made 04/09/2020, showing that most of them aren't primitive hoaxes made by people with boards to flatten the crops, and that they can tell the difference by checking for these characteristics. Researchers like Nancy Talbott and Janet Ossebaard have demonstrated that the ones with blown out nodes and other unexplained characteristics are almost certainly made by an unknown advanced intelligence of some sort, which many people associate with UFOs.

For one reason or another, as far as I know, no one has listed any of the ones that were confirmed to have unexplained characteristics, or ones that were clearly home made. The vast majority of them don't have any clear messages, and may not matter that much, except to determine that they can tell the difference, but there are a few exceptions. One is the crop circle that seems to resemble the Corona-virus; Even if this is from an unknown advanced intelligence, there's no way of knowing for certain what it means, but I wouldn't rule out the possibility that they're conducting research on it, and dropping hints. Another exception is a crop circle that appeared in August 2002 in Hampshire, and had an alleged binary message that said “Beware the bearers of false gifts and their broken promises. Much pain but still time. Believe there is good out there. We oppose deception.”

If this alleged message came from an unknown advanced intelligence of some sort, alien or not, then it's clearly deceptive; if they opposed deception they would communicate in an honest manner. If it was the same advanced intelligence that created the COVID-19 crop circle then they would explain why they're interested in it, whether they're studying medical treatment or not. If they were conducting medical research for our benefit they would communicate. If, on the other hand, they were using us for research subjects the way we use Marmosets or Macaques, then that could mean we are the sacrifices for scientific purposes. Even if it's not aliens that are using the poor for research we still have good reason to know that pharmaceutical companies and other health care corporations are using the poor for research and keeping most, if not all the benefits for the rich.

This theory is, of course, a work in process, since there isn't enough factual information available. There is enough information available to show there are serious problems with many of the supposedly scientific explanations for many unsolved mysteries, including UFOs. There's also enough information to show that if you look close enough at the best researchers into unexplained mysteries, which are not the highest profile ones, especially on "Ancient Aliens," then you might find they're closer to the truth the the traditional scientific community, and the media and political establishment. If they are using us for research, then there's still a chance for them to share that research for the benefit of us all; but this would require disclosure of what they're doing. They could use the research they do for the benefit of all people, just like scientists could use their research for the benefit of Marmosets and Macaques, if they wanted to.

Even without disclosure, we still have enough information to know that protecting all life, including wildlife requires reversal of the massive environmental destruction for short term profit; and giving the best available health care would require Single Payer health care, and an end to using patents, especially when the research is funded by tax payer dollars, enabling pharmaceutical and health care companies from gouging consumers.

But if they're planning to use this research, or what ever activities they're doing for the benefit of all, it would require full disclosure. This would quickly expose the fact that many of the claims that the government and media have been made are clearly false angering many of the people that previously believed them; however, they've hardly even done a good job pretending to tell the truth; so most people will already know they're lying about many things and might view this with cautious optimism, and a limited amount of trust, to see if they follow through.

Some people might argue that the public can't handle the truth, which is mostly if not entirely false; but even if it were true then the appropriate way to handle the situation would be to prepare them so they can handle the truth. This clearly isn't what the establishment is doing at all; although, they could argue that they're trying to use reverse psychology by doing such an incredibly bad job lying that even many of the most credulous start figuring out they've been betrayed. This could work to some degree, or perhaps it would only seem to work, but it would lead to an enormous amount of distrust and paranoia, doing far more harm than good.

This may seem insane to many people; but, it's no less insane than the entire political establishment promoting the most absurd clowns for political office, in both parties nominating extremists that cater to oligarchs no matter which one wins, assuming we continue to allow the establishment to rig nominations. If we did a better job teaching critical thinking skills, there's no way many of these incredibly corrupt politicians could ever win elections. And we would also need a media that covers honest candidates.



Edit 07/08/2020: the day after I posted this someone pointed out a video by Prof Jerry Kroth "A COVID-19 crop circle?" 07/03/2020 that makes an argument claiming that whoever made this crop circle, presumably aliens, was trying to advise us how to cure the pandemic. A large portion of his argument seems very compelling and may not be easy to dismiss. I was unable to hear the audio on this video, and it doesn't have close caption; however, a lot of it included text any way and I found an Amazon excerpt from the authors paper and the authors website so I was able to piece most of it together anyway.

First of all, if this was from aliens, and they wanted to advise us on how to cure the pandemic, possibly with help from research they've done on us, then the most effective way to do this would be to open up an honest line of communication and explain it to leading academic, and let the public know as much as they're capable of understanding. It wouldn't involve sending messages through crop circles, and nothing Jerry Kroth or anyone else can say will change that. It would be easy to acknowledge this and dismiss everything he has to say, which I'm sure many skeptics would be inclined to do, but that appears inappropriate, since a lot of his arguments seem very credible and can either be confirmed or refuted with scientific knowledge now available, although he claims that some of it wasn't available before the crop circle appeared, and additional information, which was discovered just barely before the crop circle was made, wasn't published publicly until after it was made.

Prof. Kroth explains how he consulted with various researchers into COVID-19 and explained how this crop circle matches many of the characteristics of it, except that the virus doesn't have an elongated tail about two or three times the normal size of the spikes. He concludes that this is magnified much larger than the others to draw attention to what he called Sp8, which is the part of the virus he claims that they should focus on to develop the cure. Scientists didn't begin to understand this until after the crop circle appeared, when they found out about it independently. The clear implication is that hoaxers shouldn't have had any way of knowing about this. After explaining the characteristics of the virus, he says the creators of this crop circle may have been trying to send the following message:
"You are currently suffering from a planetary wide viral pandemic. In order to make progress against this illness, concentrate your efforts on nonstructural proteins and their associated RNA mechanics which replicate the virus. You should also study the distribution of amino acids and peptides in spike proteins to help successfully immunize your species from the widespread mortality which would otherwise follow."

If his comparisons are accurate then whoever created the crop circle understood the virus better than our own researchers, although they confirmed these characteristics shortly after the crop circle was created. He raises some legitimate questions for skeptics including the following:
Are you aware that the knowledge of Sp8 was incomplete at the time of the Crop Circle's appearance? Are you aware that the knowledge of Nsp 3, 5, and fifteen were also extremely new at the time of the Crop Circle's appearance. One professor said he hadn't heard anything about NSP5 being a target for a vaccine or therapeutic? Are you aware that some of this research hadn't even been fully published at the time this crop circle appeared on May 29, 2020? One study published 3 days after the circle was first noted.

A good skeptic would consult with the appropriate academics to address these questions and any other ones in his video or related paper. Unfortunately this isn't typical behavior for high profile skeptics, who routinely resort to ridicule instead. If Prof. Kroth is right about the medical aspects of the virus and where to focus on for the cure, then it may support my theory that they're studying us for research purposes, and sharing the cure when it suits their best interests, not necessarily when it's in our best interests.

Another story that just came out said HIV patient in Brazil goes into long-term REMISSION and could be the first person to be cured of the virus using pharmaceutical drugs alone 07/07/2020 I have no way of knowing if this is related to alien research, assuming it's happening at all; however, if it is there's an enormous amount of benefit that we could get through disclosure, but they would have to communicate honestly to repair the damage done by their withholding of their advice and any activities they might have been carrying out.



The following are some additional sources or related articles:

FB Ancient Aliens: Scientists used a human gene to grow bigger monkey brains 06/0/2020 This came out within three or four days before this video was posted, although insiders may have known it months ahead. Implying that the person making this video was well informed or he worked very fast.

Scientists added human brain genes to monkeys. Yes, it’s as scary as it sounds. 04/12/2019 Of the 11 transgenic macaque monkeys they generated, six died. The five survivors went through a series of tests, including MRI brain scans and memory tests. It turned out they didn’t have bigger brains than a control group of macaques, but they did perform better on short-term memory tasks. Their brains also developed over a longer period of time, which is typical of human brains.

Scientists Put a Human Intelligence Gene Into a Monkey. Other Scientists are Concerned 12/29/2019

Chinese scientists insert human brain gene into monkeys, spark ethical debate 04/25/2019

Implants enable man to control prosthetics with ‘thoughts’ 10/21/2019

Brain implants allow paralysed patients to move limbs 03/05/2018

Mind-controlled arm prostheses that 'feel' are now a part of everyday life 04/30/2020

Exclusive: Whatever Happened to the Mouse with the Ear on Its Back? 09/16/2017

Children receive new ears grown from their own cells in world first 01/31/2018

Sheep-Human Hybrids Made in Lab—Get the Facts 02/18/2018

Human-Pig Hybrid Created in the Lab—Here Are the Facts 01/26/2017

U.K. Scientists Create Human-Cow Hybrid Embryos 04/03/2008

Humanising the mouse genome piece by piece 04/23/2019

Hybrid zoo: Introducing pig–human embryos and a rat–mouse 01/26/2017

Researching Poor, Slaves, Prisoners, To Benefit Ruling Class With Alien Technology?

Human brain size gene triggers bigger brain in monkey fetus 06/18/2020

Scientists Make Bigger Monkey Brains With The Help Of A Human Gene 06/19/2020

Eco-genocide and the Genetically Engineered Mosquito Army 06/25/2020

Notice of Intent to Sue for Violations of the Endangered Species Act Regarding the Environmental Protection Agency’s May 1, 2020 Agency Action Approving the Experimental Use Permit (EUP) for the OX5034 Aedes aegypti Mosquitoes Expressing Tetracycline Trans-Activator Variant (tTAV-OX5034) Protein in Florida and Texas 06/12/2020

Lawsuit Challenges Trump Administration's Approval of Bee-killing Pesticide, GE Crop Uses on National Wildlife Refuges 09/26/2019

Why alien abductions are down dramatically 06/12/2016

Latest release of 'X-files' shows MoD took idea of alien visitors seriously 07/12/2012

Wikipedia: Search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI)

Wikipedia: David M. Jacobs

Wikipedia: John E. Mack

Wikipedia: Barney and Betty Hill

Wikipedia: Travis Walton UFO incident

Wikipedia: Alien abduction insurance

UFO Files - The Day After Roswell (part 1 of 2) Season 2, Episode 6 first aired in 2005

UFO Files - The Day After Roswell (part 2 of 2) Season 2, Episode 6 first aired in 2005

First vaccinations begin in Africa for COVID-19 trial 06/24/2020 https://www.facebook.com/groups/1090343157696415/permalink/3237611022969607/?comment_id=3238118829585493

We Talked to the Doctor Who Treats People Who Think They've Been Abducted by Aliens 12/04/2018

Crop Circle Update: Covid-19/Brain Synapse Unification Message – May 29, 2020
Facebook replies

Virus????

Crop Circle Update: First one of the new decade and perfect timing during this Global Awakening Event! 05/29/2020

Mamoon Nooristani If you really believe that a vaxx is going to save us, I have 40 questions for you 06/28/2020

Incentivizing Pediatricians to Follow the CDC Vaccine Schedule 03/08/2018

Are Physicians Given Financial Incentives to Vaccinate Our Children? 09/08/2017

Wikipedia: Bruesewitz v. Wyeth

People protest against Coronavirus vaccine trials in Africa 07/01/2020

The Malmstrom AFB UFO/Missile Incident 03/16/1967

Out of the closet, into the fire 11/01/2013

Robert Salas Unidentified: "The UFO Phenomenon: How World Governments Have Conspired to Conceal Humanity's Biggest Secret" 2014

Retired USAF officer talks about aliens and nukes, the UFO cabal, and his abduction experience 10/29/2013

The Top Ten Scientific Discoveries of the Decade 12/31/2019

These are the top 20 scientific discoveries of the decade 12/05/2019

99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness, Italy Says 03/18/2020

It was his dream job. He never thought he'd be bribing doctors and wearing a wire for the feds. 06/07/2020

Chinese authorities confirm case of bubonic plague in Inner Mongolia 06/07/2020