Non-violent grass roots reform and Democracy: Is The Pseudo-Revolution Already In Progress?

Like many people I was thrilled to see progressive candidates, mostly women, help the Democrats take back the House, hoping they would bring about reform; however, I've been around long enough to know that when ever this happens they rarely back it up with action. I was a little surprised to see how fast they caved by coming to Nancy Pelosi's defense without getting much if anything.

After getting her their help to become speaker Pelosi did one things after another to sabotage their progressive agenda instead of coming to their defense and at least trying to support part of it! Her aide Told Insurance Executives Not to Worry About "Medicare for All"; she pushed a Tax Rule That Would "Kneecap the Progressive Agenda"; ridiculed the "Green dream or whatever"; said "I can’t say we’re going to take that and pass it," although she was nice enough to say we could discuss it, which will buy her time to bury it without admitting that she's trying to sabotage the progressive agenda; and she Snubbed the progressives by giving them few if any Influential Committee Memberships.

What could they possibly have gotten for their vote for her to become speaker?

It's not hard to figure out what Nancy Pelosi is getting, they're providing her with an enormous amount of propaganda to make her look like a progressive, which the mainstream media and so-called progressives decline to point out that she's betraying them on one issue after another!

That doesn't mean that the Green New Deal or something like it won't go through, or perhaps Single Payer as well, although that may be tougher to push through, for one simple reason; the ruling class isn't suicidal, although it often seems as if they are. They can't possibly be so stupid that they don't realize that environmental destruction won't eventually catch up with them too.

If it was just a handful of right wing fanatics demonizing Climate Change, and many other social issues, including opposition to pollution mainly impacting the poor, wars based on lies, epidemic levels of corporate fraud and much more, then it might be credible; however the entire political establishment has gone insane. Of course Trump is far more absurd, but sometimes I have to wonder if even he can be this stupid. Furthermore, even if he can be this stupid how could the political establishment have possibly let him get elected in the first place?

Can we really be certain this isn't a massive charade, which is clearly what it looks like?

Trump's latest gaffe about wind mills causes cancer is so absurd that it can't do much harm but both political parties are constantly creating fear over one issue after another, almost as if it happens on schedule! Does any one really believe he intended to keep his promise to close the border?

Or that he was going to send tariffs through the roof?

Start a nuclear war with North Korea? Or more other insane things than I can keep track of?

The latest clownish bickering between Steven Mnuchin and Maxine Waters is almost routine, with one absurd argument where neither side is even trying to do a good job representing the public; although, in this case, Maxine Waters appeared far more rational. However if the Democratic Party hadn't rallied behind Hillary Clinton helping to rig the primaries for a candidate that they must have known the majority of the public didn't like, he never would have gotten elected; and she had her turns being irrational, like when she ranted about James Comey for discussing obvious incompetence on Hillary Clinton's part. Ironically, neither James Comey, or anyone else from the political establishment seems overly concerned with some of the biggest frauds committed by either Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump or any of the other high profile politicians, perhaps since the victims of the worst scams aren't their campaign donors.

With all this incredible incompetence it's a wonder our society hasn't collapsed already!

Furthermore, the mainstream media did far more to rig the election for Trump than Russia ever could have, and the evidence for this claim isn't even secret; they're just throwing out one obsession du jour after another to keep us distracted so we don't even think about it. The media and political establishment understand that no one can get elected without name recognition, and no one can get name recognition without media coverage. The mass media is controlled by six oligarchies with a few more billionaires owning other media outlets like the #Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Boston Globe, etc. If these media outlets want to prevent someone they don't like from being elected to higher office they simply refuse to cover them.

Instead they gave obsession coverage to Trump for years, including a reality show that made him famous, and even more obsession coverage during the election season while they refused to cover hundreds more candidates that most people never heard about. Furthermore, they know how to manipulate the public far more effectively than they are doing, without being so obvious.

If they're faking one alleged threat after another they may also be controlling one limited solution after another to keep us confused, and this might explain why so many so-called progressives keep endorsing people like Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, Kamala Harris, and other corporate Democrats. The entire political establishment is made up primarily of people from the same class; but once in a while a rare grassroots candidate manages to get elected, or at least it seems that way. However if the mainstream media really doesn't want them to bring about change they can simply decline to give them the obsession coverage they need to do so, and they routinely do just that.

As I pointed out in Is Oligarchy Creating Second Wave Of Fake Progressives? If So Why? it turns out that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez actually did have ties to the Democratic Party before she won her primary, previously working for Senator Kennedy. Are they faking the threats then faking solutions that only go as far as they want them to go?

But this would have to be for an incredibly big reason, and they would need to be able to keep a lot of people going along with the agenda, otherwise it would be hard to believe such a conspiracy theory; but the official version of truth is almost as insane if not more, assuming you're paying attention.

I can't explain all the details; but if you pay attention to the news you might notice them doing one incredibly stupid thing after another that doesn't make any sense; perhaps, unless it's a massive charade to distract us from another objective, in addition to the incredible amount of greed.

Furthermore if something like this is going on it would require extraordinary evidence to support a theory in order to make it viable; however, that extraordinary evidence might exist, although it may be difficult to tie it to current events without a complicated explanation.

That evidence has existed all along, in the form of ancient megaliths that were moved large distances despite the fact that experiments to replicate these moves with technology allegedly available to these civilizations doesn't even come close to explaining it; although few people even try to connect it to insane current events. The Colossi of Memnon were among the biggest of these ancient megaliths and they weighed seven hundred-twenty tons and were moved over four hundred and twenty miles; experiments to replicate this successfully moved megaliths up to ten tons additional experiments from ten to forty tons only managed to move them very short distances and they cheated to get them on to sledges to try to drag them. They didn't even try to move larger ones; and these experiments had an enormous amount of problems dealing with broken ropes, sledges and other issues; yet ancient civilizations moved thousands of megaliths over fifty tons all around the world and hundreds of them over a hundred tons.

This simply shouldn't be possible!

There are also many other ancient wonders difficult if not impossible to replicate, although most of them aren't quite so straight forward demonstrating that they should be impossible; I went into this more in 107 Wonders of the Ancient World

We can narrow this down to one of two theories; either our early civilization was influenced by some unknown advanced intelligence of some sort, or it wasn't. If it wasn't then there has to be another explanation for how the megaliths were moved, yet the skeptics can't even come close although they've tried dozens of tactics to spin it or distract from unexplained mysteries they don't seem to want people to pay attention to.

If our early development has been influenced by some kind of unknown advanced intelligence; and they haven't maintained an open honest line of communication; then, it virtually guarantees that they have an ulterior motive of some sort. The leading religious theory to explain this is, of course, to attribute it to God; however this is commonly accompanied by a belief in a God that has a higher moral authority and is looking out for the best interest of the human race.

If that were the case then God would have maintained an open honest line of communication from the beginning and done a far better job advising people on how to avoid many disasters that modern scholars can now easily recognize and avoid. When he saw the Crusades, inquisitions, holocaust, etc. he could have communicated and let people know that wasn't what he meant. If it was what he meant there's no way he can be a higher moral authority; at best he gave tacit approval to this by withholding advice that could have avoided these disasters and many more.

Another more modern theory along these lines is the Ancient Aliens theory most famous for the version depicted on the History Channel; however, they make so many blunders that I can't believe they're trying to do a good job, any more than I can believe that politicians from either the Democratic Party or the Republican Party are trying to do a good job addressing the concerns of the vast majority of the public.

However, even though the History Channel has plenty of blunders and can't possibly be completely right, at least it tries to explain how the ancient megaliths were moved and many other unsolved mysteries, which is a step in the right direction. On top of that Philip Corso claimed that he shared alien technology retrieved from crashes starting after World War II with corporations to develop modern technology, which would explain rapid development of computer technology and many other advances since then.

If this is close to the truth then it might provide a big enough incentive for them to participate in a massive cover-up; and they might want to disclose it carefully when it suits their own purposes, not ours; which might provide them with an incentive to arrange for a partial reform movement that almost looks like the real thing.

Whether or not there is an advanced intelligence influencing our society from the beginning there's no doubt that there are a small percentage of the public controlling powerful institutions including those that decide which political candidates get the media coverage they need to get elected as I pointed out in repeatedly including in Which version of the "Deep State" is the real thing?

I also previously speculated about the possibility that there might be some similarities between the Book of Revelations and current events in 2016 before Trump was elected in Yes Virginia There Is A Trump And Clinton Conspiracy but could it be related to a far-fetched Apocalypse Prophecy or a weak copy of it? which I indicated that it should be so absurd that this theory should fall apart, however, since then, instead of falling apart there has been one absurd activity after another that might make it more viable, including the outrageous behavior at the Al Smith dinner Trump defeating Hillary when it looked as if they were rigging it for her, and more.

Additional evidence of a self-fulfilling prophecy is being presented in Israel, as I covered in Evangelical belief in the Apocalypse, accurate or not, is shaping policy when Trump agreed to move the embassy to Jerusalem and recognize it as the capital of Israel, and his latest agreement to accept their annexing of the Golan Heights adds to this. But this still doesn't explain what their motive is and what they might gain by this insane charade.

There might not be adequate information to determine all of what they're trying to accomplish, but one possibility that I've considered is that they might be using us for research including for medical purposes as I explained in Researching Poor, Slaves, Prisoners, To Benefit Ruling Class With Alien Technology? and another possibility is that, if climate change is influenced by man, then it indicates that some degree of geoengineering is possible, intentional or not; if there's been an advanced intelligence influencing us it's more likely that it might be partly intentional as I explained in Hurricane Apocalypse Coming With or Without Fringe Conspiracy Theory. This of course seems like a wild conspiracy theory; however one of the biggest alleged UFO sightings was at Fatima where it was predicted five months ahead of time that something miraculous would happen on the thirteenth of the month until October when the biggest perceived miracle would happen.

There isn't complete agreement on all the details, but there were tens of thousands of people that showed up on the final month to witness what almost all of them considered a miraculous event including what they thought was the sun entering the atmosphere and bizarre weather activity. There's no way what they saw could have been the sun but researcher later came to the conclusion that it's far more likely that it was a UFO.

There's much more evidence of bizarre unexplained phenomena, including recent activities and many other going back hundreds if not thousands of years; however it's not taken seriously by the vast majority of the public, and in most cases, many people aren't even aware of it because the record of many of these unexplained mysteries are buried where few people look ignored by mainstream media or academics, and a large portion of it is mixed in with senseless drivel, that few people want to sort through.

But mixed in with some of that senseless drivel are legitimate unsolved mysteries that might have a major impact on our society, possibly even influencing current events, which often seems like senseless drivel too.

Ignoring these unsolved mysteries won't make them go away.

If that's the case then they might not want to provide disclosure about their activities until they're done with them assuming they ever expect to finish it. If they've opened a dialogue with some of the leaders of our country to obtain their cooperation they might have led them to believe that they're willing to allow disclosure at a certain point. Possibly, when they're satisfied with the research they've carried out and no longer need to use us on a massive scale for additional research. If so they might want to provide disclosure on a controlled basis so that people won't be so outraged that they take it out on the ones colluding with the aliens.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez could conceivably be part of that, although I don't want to stop her when she's right on many issues; but there have been times, like when she voted for Pelosi that she showed she might be inclined to cave. She seems to have attracted a large number of followers from the grassroots, although that might not be entirely right. She rarely ever mentions that she previously had ties to Ted Kennedy and the same political establishment she usually seems to be standing up against. And once she won the nomination to the Democratic Party the media started giving her much more coverage which escalated even more after she was sworn in.

This isn't the first time they've had progressives that have managed to get elected to office at elections controlled at the grassroots, although it's extremely rare in statewide elections. Bernie Sanders is one of the other major exceptions, but the mainstream media didn't start giving him a significant amount of coverage until he spent years in the Senate. He's one of the only candidates representing the grassroots that actually gets any coverage at all, and when the primaries were rigged against him in 2016 he also got in line and endorsed Hillary Clinton without calling out the corruption at the polls. I doubt if he would cave on most of his policies if elected president, since his record for the most part is much better than other establishment politicians; however we have to be prepared to pressure everyone to keep their promises, even Bernie Sanders.

Having someone control the reform movement has some advantages, like cooling down people they think might be too outraged, like in Chris Hayes's town hall with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez 03/29/2019 when she said, "Hey, hey, hey. That`s unacceptable. And that`s the difference between me and Trump." after the audience started hollering at Bob Inglis and one person called him a moron. Trying to minimize violence is certainly worthwhile, but if they try to do this without the reforms that are long overdue then there's little or no chance they'll succeed, and when she votes for someone like Pelosi that she should know is going to support Wall Street's agenda that's counterproductive. There's only so much she can do to prevent people from being outraged when even she's caving and only coming up with positive rhetoric when it suits the agenda of those controlling any changes that might be going on.

Even if there's nothing to this there's still an enormous amount of evidence to indicate that the highest controlling authority, whether it's corrupt politicians, aliens, or an advanced intelligence people refer to as God, isn't trying to honestly advise the public about the best ways to solve their problems and is giving tacit approval to what ever is happening. There's plenty of research available on any given subject in libraries, academic journals, alternative media or other sources to do a much better job than what the media is reporting or politicians are using to base their policies.

The longer we wait for major reform the more damage there is to the poorest people who are already seeing their lives destroyed, like in Flint Michigan which has been almost forgotten by the mainstream media, or Crystal City Texas which also had their own problems with polluted water without getting nearly as much attention and East Chicago Indiana, which has major problems with lead poisoning.

Whether it's because of alien influence on our development or not these environmental disasters are providing an enormous amount of research opportunities, and some of this research is actually being done but the results aren't being presented to the majority of the public. And we're polluting far more people than we need to for research purposes, as well, but if they were honest about it and only did research to people that agreed to it after understanding the risks there's no way any people would do so when it comes to the biggest sacrifices, so the only way they might be able to do it might be in an incredibly corrupt system like this where a group or powerful people make all the decisions and a minority of sincere researcher are allowed to do their work even though they can't present their findings to the majority of the public.

Potential experiments go much farther than damage done by a large variety of environmental disasters to how we deal with extreme weather, building structures in some areas that can stand up to disaster, not in other; space flight, computer technology, and much more. Whether or not this theory is true we need to have much more credible science education in the mass media, which means we need to enable those that actually want to do a good job to be involved in the decision making process.

If this science education proves that this theory doesn't make any sense, as many skeptics believe, fine; I'm not trying to recommend people believe claims that don't stand up to scrutiny.

However if that scientific research can't explain many unsolved mysteries including megaliths, UFOs or mystics, then rational scientific research requires considering different possibilities, even if some of them seem far-fetched at first.

And if some positive religious beliefs helps encourage people to adopt what they consider "Christian values" to help the poor and needy, I wouldn't want to discourage that; however, at some point, they may need to reconsider many of the flaws about their beliefs like why God didn't speak out far sooner to prevent countless disasters, when people were misinterpreting his objectives, assuming they were.

Edit 04/12/2019: Incredible amount of stupidity often comes out almost every day, if not every day; and an enormous portion of it is from people who have to know how idiotic it is, even if it's from Trump. This includes his latest claims that he's going to release immigrants in sanctuary cities, which is so extreme even he has to know how bad it is, assuming it isn't part of an insane charade. Even if he was that fanatical, the political establishment knows how to rig election for those they support or at least suppress those they don't, meaning he's in power with their support despite their efforts to act outraged.

The same goes for the arresting of Julian Assange for reasons that obviously make little or no sense at all, and even the mainstream media is reporting on some of the problems, although not all. He's being charged for reporting on atrocities that were leaked in 2010, not for leaking the E-mails in 2016. Those leaks exposed war crimes committed by the American government. The mainstream media is trying to gloss over this fact, but even they report some of the details and alternative media outlets are reporting on much more. The clear implication is that when the government commits war crimes they're acting as if this is perfectly legal, but if anyone reports on it exposing them they should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. This isn't new, of course, at least not to anyone accustomed to checking alternative media outlets; however this is just another reminder of that.

The entire affair forcing Assange to stay in the embassy for the past seven years has been clownish from the beginning, originally charging him with sexual assault in Sweden, but spending millions of dollars both for the police and for the Ecuadorean embassy to carry out this charade. If you accept this scenario, then they're making Assange out to be a hero, except to those that accept the incredibly bad spin from the government. To some degree I have to agree with Assange's defenders, there should be no doubt that people exposing atrocities or other kinds of fraud would be defended; and when they prosecute them they're providing a threat to all of us and the democratic establishment.

However, even though there's little doubt that Assange is far better than typical mainstream media reporters or pundits, I have had doubts about him as I pointed out in and update of Wanted unsuspecting research subjects when the Podesta E-mails were leaked a few hours after I posted this. He used a Friday night dump which normally is used to bury news when few people are paying attention, raising doubts about his tactics. But the bigger problem was that he held his leaks back several weeks, both with the Podesta leaks and the DNC leaks. This was especially important for the first ones, since if he had leaked them earlier there might have been a greater chance to nominate Bernie Sanders, after the primaries were rigged heavily in favor of Clinton despite her incredibly high disapproval ratings.

They're creating a sophisticated story that doesn't make sense for more reasons than I can go into, but one of the problems is that even though Assange is far better than other reporters he withheld the DNC E-mails when it could have made a difference, and even though Bernie Sanders is far better than other politicians he remained silent about epidemic levels of cheating during the primaries and bought into the Russia conspiracy theory without discussing how the mainstream media routinely does far more damage by only covering crooked politicians.

If Past is prologue, then they'll just come up with one absurd scandal after another that doesn't make any sense; however if it's all part of a massive charade then it could begin to make sense!

Trump says he may release immigrant detainees in sanctuary cities, contradicting his own White House 04/12/2019

Why Ecuador ended asylum for 'spoiled brat' Julian Assange 04/12/2019

$4.2 Billion IMF Bailout For Ecuador Paved The Way For Assange’s Arrest 04/12/2019

WikiLeaks: Iraqi children in U.S. raid shot in head, U.N. says 08/31/2011