Since 9/11 I haven't looked to close at most false flag conspiracy theories about it, partly because with or without a false flag conspiracy theory, there's no doubt that the government has been using this as an excuse to chip away at our constitutional rights and to increase military presence around the world, including more conflicts based on lies, especially Iraq; but even Afghanistan has major doubts, assuming you accept the claim that Osama bin Laden ordered the attack. The mainstream media rarely ever reminds the majority of the public that our own government armed both Iraq and the mujaheddin in the eighties. Osama bin Laden was an important part of the mujaheddin, and after George HW Bush abandoned them when the Afghanistan war against the USSR they reformed as the Taliban, staying in Afghanistan and Al Qaeda with operations around the world.
These are just a couple examples where we armed our own enemies creating the grounds for future conflicts; in fact, there are probably fewer conflict where we didn't arm our own enemies beforehand than there are conflict where we did, and this can be proven with evidence from credible sources that don't appear to be fringe conspiracy theorist. Another part of the reason I hesitated to believe it is that it would be way to big and risky even for the most authoritarian people in our government, especially if it's just being done for greed and power, as most conspiracy theorists seem to claim, which means there would have to be a bigger motive, and perhaps reason to believe they thought they could control it.
However, even though I didn't seek it out I keep coming across some legitimate questions that raise doubts about the official story. The strongest evidence, according to many, is the collapse of Building number 7, but there's much more evidence about many other things. Perhaps one of the most obvious reasons to doubt is the extremely unlikely event that five people on each plane, except Flight 93 which only had four hijackers could have gained access to the cockpits with nothing more than box cutters. This is what I was most skeptical about shortly after 9/11. Why most conspiracy theorists, that I know of, don't put more emphasis on this I can't figure. But regardless of why there's much more evidence raising doubts about the official story, and some of it is very compelling.
However, this still doesn't explain how greed and a quest for power could have been strong enough motive for something so massive. Furthermore, even though there is some evidence of insider trading and buying a massive insurance policy, including coverage for acts of terrorism, shortly before the attack, there are far more elites who must have lost far more money than they gained by it, and they would have the motive to hold, scam artists like Larry Silverstein accountable, assuming he was involved so that he could profit from it. Well connected white collar criminals rarely get prosecuted as much as blue collar criminals; however the most notable exceptions would often be if the victims are other well connected or wealthy people, perhaps like Michael Milken, Bernie Madoff and Martin Shkreli. In Martin Shkreli's case he was scamming far more working class people than wealthy out of much more money, but thanks to his wealth and laws rigged in favor of the wealthy he was never held accountable for that, and only charged for crimes against other wealthy people; and after Milken spent time in jail the media started referring to him as a philanthropist, even though his involvement in privatizing of schools was an obvious scam and it was suppressing educational opportunities for the poor, yet mainstream media ignores this.
If Larry Silverstein were involved in a 9/11 conspiracy theory to profit off insurance or others off of insider trading, many other well connected people would be justifiably outraged and demanded Justice and the anger over it would have been so severe that Silverstein would have known it ahead of time and not even tried it, nor is it likely that he would have the connections to carry it out unless it was much bigger. Yet the evidence does seem to indicate the official story may not even be close, so there almost certainly was a much bigger motive. Perhaps the most compelling case that I've seen is Loose Change, (After glancing at some of the other organizations questioning the official story it's clear that some of them might be at least as good, or used as sources by Loose Change, but this is still a good summation) which doesn't explain this bigger motive adequately but does raise many other legitimate questions as the following summation along with a link to the full documentary (about seventy minutes long) and a little of my own input shows:
Loose Change 2nd Edition (HD) FULL MOVIE 12/18/2018
The documentary opens up by discussing Operation Northwoods which is a false flag declassified document that's notorious among Conspiracy Theorists but the vast majority of the public probably never heard of. This was a plan from 1962 created by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) and signed by Lyman Lemnitzer, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, which discusses planning terrorist attacks on American military or civilians, including Cuban immigrants then using it as an excuse to invade Cuba. This was rejected by John F Kennedy and Robert McNamara. Shortly after this plan was submitted Lyman Lemnitzer was removed as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and was appointed as commander of U.S. European Command, and as Supreme Allied Commander Europe of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), possibly as a result of this report. But for some reason he wasn't fired, supposedly both were so outraged by this plan that hey removed him.
Thirteen years later he was appointed to the Commission on CIA Activities within the United States (aka the Rockefeller Commission) to investigate whether the CIA was involved in illegal activities possibly even including the Kennedy assassination. This isn't the first, or last, time they appointed someone with and espionage, which they refer to as "intelligence," background to investigate illegal activities of the espionage organizations; Allen Dulles was appointed to the Warren Commission and dominated it, even though he was fired by Kennedy and had a major conflict of interest. Some might argue that this was the Cold War mentality; however this would make more sense if there weren't repeated attempts to start wars based on lies, including the Iraq War, when they knew there were no weapons of mass destruction ahead of time. I can cite many more examples for those interested; however, those accustomed to checking alternative media already know about many of them, while those that want to cover it up won't acknowledge it anyway. Those just breaking away from traditional media shouldn't be afraid to ask; many of us went through that before.
Another claim they made is that there was insider trading and that Larry Silverstein who already owned building number seven, signed agreement to buy the two towers and takes out 3.5 billion dollar insurance policy, specifically covering acts of terrorism. Snopes partially debunked some conspiracy theories about the claim that he tried to get double the policy and won, calling it a mixture; however, the documentary Loose Change didn't make this claim, so a leading skeptical debunker has actually confirmed an aspect of their theory, and so does the Wikipedia article on Larry Silverstein.
However, Larry Silverstein didn't make a fortune from this, nor did he loose an enormous amount of money. He did try to claim double on his insurance policy, claiming that each plane was a separate attack, but had to settle for a smaller payment; and this would have been predictable for anyone familiar with how insurance companies operate. They routinely try to cut their losses in court, often spending the money they collect from premiums on legal expenses instead of paying claims to convince people to settle for less. This is necessary for insurance companies to remain profitable; if the odds aren't rigged in their own favor they would go bankrupt. There was also some alleged insider trading, but there's no way the profits from this would possibly be close enough to carrying out such an extreme conspiracy, especially since many of the people taking the biggest losses, including the insurance companies have as much, if not more political power that Silverstein or the inside traders, and they would see to it that the fraud was exposed, yet they're going along with the cover-up.
They claim the impact was enough to eliminate most traces of the plane at the Pentagon; if how could they identify the vast majority of the people? Supposedly it's scientifically impossible for the jet fuel to vaporize the plane; no plane in history has vaporized, and they've always found more debris at other plane crashes. Perhaps the biggest unexplained mystery at the Pentagon was a 16 foot hole in the pentagon with minimal plane debris; and there's no way the plane could have fit though that 16 foot hole. Furthermore the wings would have done much more damage to the side of the building than what appears in the video or pictures. The producers speculated about the possibility that it was a cruise missile, since that would have produced these characteristics. They also confiscated a tape from the pentagon and only showed five stills from it, none with a plane in it. They could have released the whole thing, showing the plane.
Supposedly bomb sniffing dogs were pulled from the world trade center a day or two before the attack. There was discussion of other buildings with fires as bad if not worse without taking them down. The towers plus building 7 were first 3 taken down by such a fire; and there probably haven't been any more since. There were reports of at least one more explosion on the 8th or 9th floor, possibly another on the lobby. The video provided comparisons with controlled explosions taking down buildings intentionally, showing the similarities, including a free-fall, where everything collapses with little or no resistance at the same time, since the explosions destroy the supports simultaneously. If it had collapsed as a result of a fire you wouldn't expect every support to collapse at the same time, so this should have been impossible.
Mayor Giuliani started shipping debris to recycling center before in could be completely examined. Some supposedly indestructible Black Boxes were destroyed, while a passport from one of the terrorists flew out of the plane and was found in the street, which is highly improbable, if not impossible. Witness says they searched for the Black boxes at towers and found three out of four, yet the official report claims this didn't happen. Families of Flight 93 in Pa. heard recording but had to sign an agreement agreeing they couldn't talk about it, or even take notes, and the last three minutes were unaccounted for.
Cell phone calls were allegedly made from Flight 93 shouldn't have been possible in planes in 2001 They did experiments to replicate this; and there was technology added in 2004 so people could use their cell phones on planes. If it was possible for all these cell phone calls from Flight 93 in 2001, then it shouldn't have been necessary to add expensive technology in 2004. If the claims about this are true that there must be plenty of people that fly and constantly use their cell phones recognizing that this shouldn't have been possible.
And they claim that at least nine of the hijackers allegedly turned up alive after the attack. If this is true, then they should be able to find them and confirm this.
When looking for a motive the best they seem to come up with is greed, insurance, insider trading, ability to pass Patriot Act, invade Afghanistan and Iraq. This simply shouldn't have been adequate to provide a motive for something this risky, insane or big. How could they possibly have thought they could carry out a scam so big? There has to be something bigger that hasn't been disclosed yet, assuming this theory is partly true. Complete article
The documentary opens up by discussing Operation Northwoods which is a false flag declassified document that's notorious among Conspiracy Theorists but the vast majority of the public probably never heard of. This was a plan from 1962 created by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) and signed by Lyman Lemnitzer, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, which discusses planning terrorist attacks on American military or civilians, including Cuban immigrants then using it as an excuse to invade Cuba. This was rejected by John F Kennedy and Robert McNamara. Shortly after this plan was submitted Lyman Lemnitzer was removed as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and was appointed as commander of U.S. European Command, and as Supreme Allied Commander Europe of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), possibly as a result of this report. But for some reason he wasn't fired, supposedly both were so outraged by this plan that hey removed him.
Thirteen years later he was appointed to the Commission on CIA Activities within the United States (aka the Rockefeller Commission) to investigate whether the CIA was involved in illegal activities possibly even including the Kennedy assassination. This isn't the first, or last, time they appointed someone with and espionage, which they refer to as "intelligence," background to investigate illegal activities of the espionage organizations; Allen Dulles was appointed to the Warren Commission and dominated it, even though he was fired by Kennedy and had a major conflict of interest. Some might argue that this was the Cold War mentality; however this would make more sense if there weren't repeated attempts to start wars based on lies, including the Iraq War, when they knew there were no weapons of mass destruction ahead of time. I can cite many more examples for those interested; however, those accustomed to checking alternative media already know about many of them, while those that want to cover it up won't acknowledge it anyway. Those just breaking away from traditional media shouldn't be afraid to ask; many of us went through that before.
Another claim they made is that there was insider trading and that Larry Silverstein who already owned building number seven, signed agreement to buy the two towers and takes out 3.5 billion dollar insurance policy, specifically covering acts of terrorism. Snopes partially debunked some conspiracy theories about the claim that he tried to get double the policy and won, calling it a mixture; however, the documentary Loose Change didn't make this claim, so a leading skeptical debunker has actually confirmed an aspect of their theory, and so does the Wikipedia article on Larry Silverstein.
However, Larry Silverstein didn't make a fortune from this, nor did he loose an enormous amount of money. He did try to claim double on his insurance policy, claiming that each plane was a separate attack, but had to settle for a smaller payment; and this would have been predictable for anyone familiar with how insurance companies operate. They routinely try to cut their losses in court, often spending the money they collect from premiums on legal expenses instead of paying claims to convince people to settle for less. This is necessary for insurance companies to remain profitable; if the odds aren't rigged in their own favor they would go bankrupt. There was also some alleged insider trading, but there's no way the profits from this would possibly be close enough to carrying out such an extreme conspiracy, especially since many of the people taking the biggest losses, including the insurance companies have as much, if not more political power that Silverstein or the inside traders, and they would see to it that the fraud was exposed, yet they're going along with the cover-up.
They claim the impact was enough to eliminate most traces of the plane at the Pentagon; if how could they identify the vast majority of the people? Supposedly it's scientifically impossible for the jet fuel to vaporize the plane; no plane in history has vaporized, and they've always found more debris at other plane crashes. Perhaps the biggest unexplained mystery at the Pentagon was a 16 foot hole in the pentagon with minimal plane debris; and there's no way the plane could have fit though that 16 foot hole. Furthermore the wings would have done much more damage to the side of the building than what appears in the video or pictures. The producers speculated about the possibility that it was a cruise missile, since that would have produced these characteristics. They also confiscated a tape from the pentagon and only showed five stills from it, none with a plane in it. They could have released the whole thing, showing the plane.
Supposedly bomb sniffing dogs were pulled from the world trade center a day or two before the attack. There was discussion of other buildings with fires as bad if not worse without taking them down. The towers plus building 7 were first 3 taken down by such a fire; and there probably haven't been any more since. There were reports of at least one more explosion on the 8th or 9th floor, possibly another on the lobby. The video provided comparisons with controlled explosions taking down buildings intentionally, showing the similarities, including a free-fall, where everything collapses with little or no resistance at the same time, since the explosions destroy the supports simultaneously. If it had collapsed as a result of a fire you wouldn't expect every support to collapse at the same time, so this should have been impossible.
Mayor Giuliani started shipping debris to recycling center before in could be completely examined. Some supposedly indestructible Black Boxes were destroyed, while a passport from one of the terrorists flew out of the plane and was found in the street, which is highly improbable, if not impossible. Witness says they searched for the Black boxes at towers and found three out of four, yet the official report claims this didn't happen. Families of Flight 93 in Pa. heard recording but had to sign an agreement agreeing they couldn't talk about it, or even take notes, and the last three minutes were unaccounted for.
Cell phone calls were allegedly made from Flight 93 shouldn't have been possible in planes in 2001 They did experiments to replicate this; and there was technology added in 2004 so people could use their cell phones on planes. If it was possible for all these cell phone calls from Flight 93 in 2001, then it shouldn't have been necessary to add expensive technology in 2004. If the claims about this are true that there must be plenty of people that fly and constantly use their cell phones recognizing that this shouldn't have been possible.
And they claim that at least nine of the hijackers allegedly turned up alive after the attack. If this is true, then they should be able to find them and confirm this.
When looking for a motive the best they seem to come up with is greed, insurance, insider trading, ability to pass Patriot Act, invade Afghanistan and Iraq. This simply shouldn't have been adequate to provide a motive for something this risky, insane or big. How could they possibly have thought they could carry out a scam so big? There has to be something bigger that hasn't been disclosed yet, assuming this theory is partly true. Complete article
Several other researchers confirm many of their conclusions including Architects & Engineers which writes in Near-Free-Fall Acceleration | Twin Towers:
"Based on Newton’s Third Law of Motion, which states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, we know there would have been a deceleration of WTC 1’s upper section if it had impacted and crushed the intact structure below it. The absence of deceleration is incontrovertible proof that another force (i.e., explosives) must have been responsible for destroying the lower structure before the upper section reached it."
They make essentially the same argument, with minor variations on several of their pages including Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth: Free-Fall Acceleration | World Trade Center Building 7 which says:
Newton’s third law says that when objects interact, they always exert equal and opposite forces on each other. Therefore, while an object is falling, if it exerts any force on objects in its path, those objects must push back, slowing the fall. If an object is observed to be in free fall, we can conclude that nothing in the path exerts a force to slow it down....”
Applying this to WTC 7, he explains:
“[F]ree fall is not consistent with any natural scenario involving weakening, buckling, or crushing because in any such a scenario there would be large forces of interaction with the under- lying structure that would have slowed the fall.... Natural collapse resulting in free fall is simply not plausible....”
And a more recent article with help from a newer study Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth: WTC 7 Not Destroyed by Fire, Concludes Final University of Alaska Fairbanks Report
“Our study found that the fires in WTC 7 could not have caused the observed collapse,” said Professor Leroy Hulsey, the study’s principal investigator. “The only way it could have fallen in the observed manner is by the near-simultaneous failure of every column.”
The following picture from the Guardian also seems to support their concerns about whether or not this hole was made by an airplane or not. It does seem to have lots of small debris, perhaps more than the documentary admits to but no large pieces. However, if this was hit by a plane, not a cruise missile, then why wouldn't the walls on both sides of the hole have more damage. Furthermore, if their claim that this was only 16 feet wide and there's another hole in the next wall that's also 16 feet wide, that still wouldn't have been wide enough for the plane even without the wings.
Additional evidence may have been provided by The New York Times in an article shortly after the bombing in 1993, THE NATION; Figuring What It Would Take to Take Down a Tower 03/21/1993, which says "The World Trade Center's towers were also built to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707 jet, the largest flying at the time of the center's design. The plane was assumed to be fresh out of Kennedy International Airport, fully loaded and carrying full tanks of fuel. While such a crash would cause great damage to the building, the design is such that the building would not topple." Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice made a similar argument in --City in the Sky, p 131
But the motive for such a large conspiracy would still have to be much larger, and there's also problems with the controlled demolition theory, since that would have taken an enormous amount of explosives, which would have to have been placed throughout the building, yet there were no witnesses saying they saw any of these explosives, that I know of and they would have had very little time to do it. According to How do you demolish a skyscraper? 11/30/2012 "carrying out such a demolition involves painstaking preparation. It can take up to six months to survey the structure and prepare it for the blast by removing non-load bearing walls, weakening support structures and fitting the charges. Clearing up debris afterwards can take up to two months."
This is based on the assumption that the people demolishing a building were concerned about safety, which presumably, if this was an inside job they weren't. They may have had all night to plant the bombs near each column, and there would have to be enough explosive to pulverize the concrete, as Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth claims was done. This would have been a monumental task, which would have involved everyone working at night, or they would have to arrange for anyone not aiding and abetting to either be out of the building or distracted will large demolition crews worked overnight. How could they have placed so many bombs without anyone seeing them? Of course if the only people that might have seen them died they couldn't have told, but they managed to evacuate a lot of people, none that supposedly saw it. If anyone did see something could they have been intimidated into remaining silent?
A comparison to the biggest truck bombings in history also shows that it doesn't even come close in the size of the destruction; for example the Oklahoma City bombing 1995, the Khobar Towers bombing 1996, the 1983 United States embassy bombing in Beirut and the 14 October 2017 Mogadishu bombings all had more than 2 tons of explosive, perhaps up to 10 tons of explosive for the biggest one, yet they couldn't completely take down the buildings, which were only a fraction of the size. Whether this was the result of a fire caused by the jet fuel, which wouldn't have been that much more damaging than these truck bombs, or controlled demolition with known technology, these buildings shouldn't have come down, yet they did.
This means that the conspiracy, assuming that's what it was, would have to be even bigger and more complicated, involving technology that demolition experts aren't aware of. It also means there are flaws that haven't been adequately explained in both the official story and the conspiracy theories, so at best both of these explanations are incomplete, which the conspiracy theorists probably admit, because they don't have inside information.
If you Google the possibility that aliens or UFOs might be involved in it you'll find mostly articles from the mainstream media pointing out the most ridiculous conspiracy theories without any background or credible evidence. This is typical of the mainstream media; the most credible evidence of a major unsolved mystery is routinely ignored, and only available at low profile locations while the least credible gets much more attention helping to create stereotypes about fringe conspiracy theorists, so when the more credible claims get some attention it's easier to smear the more credible researchers.
However, if the conspirators had much more advanced technology than has been publicly disclosed, this might help explain how they were able to create a controlled demolition, assuming that's what happened. There are numerous sources that have claimed that the government and leading corporations have obtained advanced technology from alien space craft and reverse engineered it. Perhaps the most credible one and well known claim for this is Philip Corso best selling author of "The Day After Roswell," other sources include Bob Lazar, Boyd Bushman and a group of anonymous current or former government employees that allegedly have inside knowledge, which I go into more below, but they all have major credibility problems. But Bob Lazar did announce that a new element was developed by the aliens, and that claim turned out to be true years later, which he probably couldn't have know about without inside information.
If aliens or some other unknown advanced intelligence has been influencing the human race for decades, if not thousands of years, this would have an enormous impact on our society which most people wouldn't even suspect, because the subject is treated in such an irrational manner and often relegated to fringe irrational believers. This is especially true if aliens have introduced advanced technology to certain segments of society, and if they've influenced our early historical development including the moving of megaliths that shouldn't have been possible with ancient technology or the early development of religion. If there's evidence to support this belief, which there might be, then it could have an enormous impact on all parts of our society, including these attacks one way or another. And if Corso was sharing technology and others also shared additional technology it could include many hings, including the technology for controlled demolition. Without explaining that, the Conspiracy Theorists have a serious problem with the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings, although the evidence from other attacks seems to be compelling.
If there is something to this theory, then the vast majority of the public is unaware of the fundamental basics of this research; and many people who do believe in UFOs may have accepted some of the exaggerations or out right lies, especially if they don't have an adequate scientific background. With or without an alien connection the motive for this is extremely hard to imagine; but there's no doubt that at a minimum, the mainstream media is withholding many of the most effective solutions to many problems, including wars based on lies, the most effective way to reduce violence, how to create a fairer economic system and much more; and if there ware aliens or some other advanced intelligence then this problem is much bigger. If there is an advanced intelligence religious people know of as "God" then this "God" could have maintained an honest line of communication advising how to avoid war going back thousands of years, and develop a more just society; instead religion has inspired authoritarian beliefs systems that dictate the truth and help create these wars instead of preventing them, along with shoring up the authority of hundreds of tyrants throughout the centuries.
If there is an alien agenda that's been going on for thousands of years, there's no doubt that they did much worse, as a result of negligence, if nothing else, by withholding advice that could have prevented the crusades, inquisitions, Holocaust, plagues, and much more. This seems to mean that they consider us expendable.
I'm not aware of any direct evidence of an alien influence on the 9/11 attacks; however there may be evidence of a lot of advanced technology obtained from aliens, or some other unknown advanced intelligence. There may also be some evidence to show that this is a controlled demolition, but this shouldn't be possible. A large portion of the evidence by the conspiracy theorists adds up, and the government is ridiculing them as conspiracy theorists or trying to avoid addressing these issues, which means that there's good reason to consider other possibilities, including the chance that they had more advanced technology that could have made the controlled demolition possible. I'm not aware of another expiation to the problems in both arguments, and there's much more evidence to indicate that governments routinely lie about many things so we can't take their word for much if anything.
Furthermore as Sherlock Holmes, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, or Mr. Spock might say "Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth." This is a possibility that's hardly been considered and hasn't been eliminated, while the theories from both sides are at best, incomplete, if not impossible. If the conspiracy theorists could come up with another explanation as to how the controlled demolition happened then they might be viable, and there's also much more the government has to explain to make their claim viable, assuming it's possible at all.
But thanks to the incompetent manner the main stream media handles the subject avoiding covering the most basics of this the vast majority of the public isn't aware of the strongest evidence of it including thousands of UFO sightings (My Top Twelve UFO Sightings) megaliths that shouldn't have been possible to move with ancient technology, Crop Circles, Dozens if not hundreds of alleged Prophets and Mystics (This is just a handful of them with more cited below) and more, which is mostly being ignored by scientists or ridiculed by pseudo-skeptics, enabling unscientific believers to dominate the debate without sorting out the most credible evidence.
I may not be able to fill in all the details, but UFO Hypothesis with rational use of Occam's Razor I began a theory about how they might ahve arrived here, with technology that is rapidly developing here over the past few decades. This doesn't include traveling faster than the speed of light or wormholes, as some conspiracy theorists believe is possible. Instead it relies on automated technology, nanotechnology, advanced propulsion and many other improved technology that has either already been developed or is beginning to look like it's possible. This is similar to a science fiction scenario presented by James Hansen a leading NASA scientist at the end of "Storms of my Grandchildren." I also explained how there's an enormous amount of disinformation being spread by the government, and that some UFO researchers may be involved in this as part of what might be a controlled disclosure effort in Is Stanton Friedman working for the CIA to refute reverse engineering claims? which includes what I call a "Recruit e a Group of Crackpots" hypothesis based on a phrase from the "Roswell" documentary over twenty years ago staring Martin Sheen.
I may not have a complete explanation for a possible motive, either with or without an alien hypothesis, but I have been developing a theory of their long term motive; and there might be a small hint that connects it to both the September eleventh attack and the current pandemic. If they can't travel faster than the speed of light and rely mostly on automation artificial intelligence and other technologies to get here over a very long period of time, as my Occam's Razor article claims, one thing they might be interested in doing here is research on things big and small, and the results of that research could be sent throughout the universe where ever advanced life exists, and assuming they stopped using us for research, they could share that benefit with us. According to many theories, they already are; however, this is only being shared with a small percentage of the public, if this theory is true, and that small percentage of the public isn't trying to use it to help all people fairly. Instead they're using it to increase their power and control us.
One of the most important thing that they might be researching is medical treatment as I went into in several articles including Researching Poor, Slaves, Prisoners, To Benefit Ruling Class With Alien Technology? and Spectacular Heart Transplant for Sofia But at What Cost which discusses how her life was saved by a heart transplant and she still appears to be doing well with her new heart, the latest article I could find about Sofia Sanchez is from December 9 2019 and there's no reason to believe she's had complications since then, showing that a small percentage could be benefiting from this research already. However, we could save many more lives even without rapid advancement of medical treatment with Single Payer and health care for all, along with reducing pollution and other preventative actions that could stop illnesses before thy develop without controversial transplants that use other people for research and even for non-voluntary organ donations as I went into in Is Falun Gong Partly Right About Aliens? This technology could be great, if they weren't withholding it from the majority of the human race, and even using many people for research; this is true even if the technology isn't coming from aliens.
Another source of major research may also be weather manipulation, which is going on with or without alien technology, according to scientific reports submitted to the government by law. I went into this more in Hurricane Apocalypse Coming With or Without Fringe Conspiracy Theory which explains that if Climate Change is caused by man it's a form of Geoengineering, although supposedly unintentionally and doing more harm than good. I followed this up more recently with Forgotten History Exposing The Illusion Of Democracy & Government Reports on Weather Control which includes a review of one of the scientific reports that was mandated by a 1958 law, which was repealed in 1968, although a couple more reports came out as a result of this law, most disclosure is no longer mandated by law that I know of.
There is some potential circumstantial evidence showing that the 9/11 attack could have helped with the research into Climate Change, intentionally or not, according to Tim Flannery, who assumes it's not intentional, in "The Weather Makers" 2006 p.279-83 he writes:
As mentioned earlier, the potential of these clouds to affect climate was demonstrated in 2001 between September 11 and 14, when the U.S. air fleet was grounded. Average daytime temperatures rose abruptly by 2°F, in such a manner as could not be explained by other factors. this suggests that contrails may be masking the impacts of warming caused by CO2. Perhaps we will need to maintain them while we reduce our carbon intensity. Equally, there seems no way at present to get aircraft to run on any less damaging substitute for fossil fuel. Without a return to the more leisurely days of travel by zeppelin, air travel will remain a source of CO2 emissions long after other sectors have transformed to a carbon-free economy.
This is just one of the minor methods they've learned they can influence the weather, the weather modification reports from the sixties explain even more; presumably it's gotten more complicated since then, but there's little or no effort to educate the public about the best research, and mandatory reports to the president and Congress, which are also available to the public are no longer required by law, so it's hard to find out which sources are most reliable. Without a sincere effort to educate the public about the most reliable weather modification methods, the most prominent people discussing it on the internet are conspiracy theorists, who often appear to be fringe, discussing "Chem Trails" or "HAARP" in a manner that often doesn't seem credible. Some of these claims are often debunked, and probably rightly so, but some of the things they claim are allegedly done with Chem Trails are very similar to cloud seeding, which is explained in the scientific reports, or to Contrails, which as Tim Flannery explains can also impact Global Warming. The recent pandemic has lead to another large drop in air travel that lasted much longer than the three day moratorium after 9/11, although it may not have been a complete ban, so this will provide another opportunity to check see if lack of chem trails increases the difference between the temperature between day and night again. And there's also a massive drop in air pollution, providing additional research opportunities, although the current political establishment won't allow us to benefit from this research.
Another major unsolved mystery is alleged prophecies that claim to partially or completely predict the future, and according to believers many of them have come true; however, skeptics always find some aspects of the prophecies that don't come true and they're often phrased in a manner that is vague, or what Jesus referred to as parables, which could be interpreted in many different ways. One of the most famous alleged prophets who could predict the future is, of course, Nostradamus, but there are many more including Helena Blavatsky, biblical prophecies etc. Perhaps one of the most convincing examples of an alleged prophet, mystic or spiritualist (they go by many names) is Andrew Jackson Davis author of "The Penetralia" who was from the nineteenth century and was very well known at the time, but is almost forgotten now, although he predicted a lot of modern technology along with getting the length of the days for Jupiter and Saturn right and coming very close to getting the speed of light right, close to if not more than a hundred years before these were scientifically calculated. By the time it became clear that many of his predictions came true, or at least close, most people stopped paying attention to him, so it seems few realized that he was right on many issues. However, in all fairness, if you go through his books it will be clear that the majority of his claims were clearly wrong; but the things he got right are virtually impossible to explain, since they're beyond wild guesses.
Since Nostradamus is so much better known, I've been familiar with him much longer. Some of his alleged predictions seem very compelling; however, since he makes these predictions in vague or confusing Quatrains I have to rely on other people interpretations. Business Insider provides a list of 14 Famous Predictions By Nostradamus 12/31/2011 along with a review debunking some and indicating that others might be close to the truth; but since they're presented in riddles it can be interpreted in many different ways. One Quatrain which allegedly applies to the September 11 attacks is the following:
"Earthshaking fire from the center of the Earth
Will cause tremors around the New City.
Two great rocks will war for a long time,
Then Arethusa will redden a new river."
Personally I can't make any sense out of this; and once again, instead of relying on the original Quatrain what got my attention was a 1981 documentary twenty years before 9/11 that seems to get it close, Orson Welles Nostradamus The Man Who Saw Tomorrow 1981 It's not perfect, of course, but towards the end of this documentary it predicts that a King or Shah will make a devastating attack on New York City, which is actually much worse than the 2001 attack, using nuclear weapons, possibly leading to the end of civilization. This is overly hyped and exaggerated but there were more similarities to the real thing than I would have expected. This is of course, assuming you accept the official explanation of 9/11; if it was a controlled demolition, it wouldn't fulfill the prophecy, although it might seem like it was intended to.
If there were an advanced intelligence that religious people perceive as being "God" and this advanced intelligence was experimenting with us and had specific experiments that they intended to do at specific times, that might also be related to these predictions, they would have known generally what to predict and could have leaked hints through vague prophecies that people wouldn't understand until it's too late, assuming we even understand it then. There were also many alleged prophecies predicting the pandemic, although many were from scientists not prophets as indicated in, Bill Gates has been warning of a global health threat for years. Here are 12 people who seemingly predicted the coronavirus pandemic. 05/13/2020; however they did include at least two from alleged mystics, one a modern self described prophet, who could have repeated the predictions from scientists, for all I know and another from Nostradamus.
There was at least one other famous one which I went into in my previous article Fake Corona-virus Apocalypse? which claimed this was the "Pale Horse," supposedly the last prediction before the return of Christ, according to some. But there have been plenty of predictions saying the coming of Christ was imminent, and none of them have happened; furthermore, this is based on the "good God" hypothesis, which can't be true, since a good God would have communicated and advised on how to prevent many disasters.
That article also speculated about the possibility that this might be part of a medical research project; there's no doubt they're researching it, as they should, but experiments to do so intentionally for some reason would be far more extreme. At the time I was skeptical about how bad the pandemic would get, since it was much more hype than the number of infections when I began writing that article, by the time I finished it the death toll rose a bit; but it wasn't until shortly after I posted it that it skyrocketed above a thousand a day and even above two thousand for a little while. It may be much worse than I expected at that time; but it's still not nearly as bad as many historical pandemics including the Spanish Influenza that killed about fifty million at a time when the population was 70% lower, the Smallpox wiping out most Native Americans, or the plagues, which were the worst pandemics ever, by most standards.
Another previous article Were Ancient Aliens Experimenting With Humans during Plague Epidemics? speculated about the possibility that Ancient Aliens were experimenting on health back then, pointing out that modern scientists still don't know whey the plagues kept coming back over and over again, nor do they know why they suddenly stopped happening just over three hundred years ago. The researchers from that time didn't understand it at all, and certainly didn't know how to stop it, yet after the seventeenth century they suddenly stopped reoccurring. If aliens were experimenting with it could they have learned how to stop it, or developed an immunity for it? If so could they be doing the same thing with the Coronavirus?
Whether or not there is contact with aliens there's an enormous effort to convince people there is; and even if aliens are visiting there seems to be a major effort to convince people to believe a false mythology that distorts many of the facts, including the Ancient Aliens show on the History Channel, which does get some facts right, regardless of how ridiculous it often looks, but it also mixes these correct claims with an enormous number of false ones. My best guess is that they're trying to disclose some accurate information in a manner that few rational people will believe, since sorting through which is right requires a lot of fact checking. There may be other efforts to create a false mythology about visits from aliens being kept secret, including an alleged series of disclosure from anonymous insiders that gained a lot of attention from some devoted UFO believers called the Serpo disclosures, which is a long detailed set of alleged confessions, including some alleged leaked documents like Serpo Release 27a transcript for Reagan's briefing on Roswell. This has been taken down from the internet, at least temporarily about a week or so ago, but I retrieved it from the Wayback Machine. For starters, they don't provide the original document, that I know of, but there are more problems with this.
I started having doubts about this when reading this page, and it was confirmed that this is at least partly if not entirely fake. My first concern was when Reagan asked "How long did it take this spaceship to get here?" and the "Caretaker" which is leading the debriefing attempts to avoid answering this simple question explaining that they were concerned about reevaluating the security clearance of the people in the room, even though there's little or no reason this simple question would raise security questions after a five to ten minutes of going back and forth with meaning less banter Reagan agrees to let him make his disclosures when he sees fit, then he just answers the question anyway, saying, "It took the EBE spaceship nine (9) of our months to travel the 40 [38.42] light-years. Now, as you can see, that would mean the EBE spaceship traveled faster than the speed of light."
My best guess is that this is impossible and that the aliens can't travel faster than the speed of light as I indicated in the article about Occam's Razor. but there were some other flaws in the way they described Zeta Reticuli, which is the star system they claim the aliens came from. This is a binary system, which should mean that in most cases that the temperature wouldn't be consistent enough to develop advanced life. However, since the two stars in the Zeta Reticuli system are 350 billion miles apart, one of them would be very dim, perhaps not much if any brighter than our full moon, to a planet orbiting the other at a distance that allows for life to develop in what they call the "Goldilocks Zone," because the temperature is just right, like Earth. But the briefing claimed that it was light all the time on this planet, which might have been true during the part of the year where the planet was in between the two starts, although the light from the star 350 billion miles away wouldn't be nearly as bright at night, but on the other part of the year when the planet is on the other side of the closer sun neither sun would be visible at night.
There were several other problems on the page with the briefing that led me to doubt it; but for true believers, they could probably be explained away, even if I disagree; however, on the third disclosure from this web page, Posting Three by Anonymous (7 November, 2005), they described the same planet saying that it was 91 million miles from one sun and 96 million miles from the other, which is obviously false; not only would one of the suns be 350 billion miles away in this system, but if it were another system, they couldn't possibly have consistent distances like this since they would be orbiting one of the suns, unless the two stars were very close to each other and the planet was orbiting both, which would have made them about the same distance, but it would have still fluctuated.
Despite this obvious flaw and many others at least one high profile UFO researcher seems to think it's legitimate, Mike Bara author of Hidden Agenda: NASA and the Secret Space Program 2016. He does acknowledge that some people claim they're fake, but he justifies his belief in their legitimacy by asking "If it is fake, the effort to create the air of authenticity is off the scale. Why would anyone even bother, especially if they're giving the information for free?"
This doesn't address the serious flaws that indicate that this is at least partly, if not entirely fake, but it is a legitimate question. There's still no doubt that this isn't a credible source; but this isn't a simple hoax, since it would have taken way to much time. as for who would do it and why the most likely answer is the CIA or what ever organization that is controlling misinformation and propaganda bout UFOs. This appears to be a complex effort to control the mythology about UFOs, and by accepting the legitimacy of these papers Mike Bara is helping with that effort, intentionally or not.
There may be much more evidence of unsolved mysteries that many of us have never heard of, for example I just heard of Wikipedia: Dorothy Eady for the first time, which looks like a compelling case for a major unsolved mystery, although I haven't looked too closely so I wouldn't call it the most compelling one I know of some of the ones previously mentioned have much stronger evidence including Andrew Jackson Davis, and other compelling examples of mystics that can't be explained easily include Padre Pio and Helena Blavatsky along with at least half a dozen or a dozen more are enough to establish a pattern of behavior showing that an unknown advanced intelligence might be influencing many people, although many of them might not provide clear evidence.
I've known about David Icke for quite a while, and knew that he came up with many irrational and fanatical ideas, along with a few good ones; but I only recently realized that he claimed to have met with an alleged mystic, Betty Shine, claiming that she received messages from the "spirit world" telling her that he would become famous and that the "spirit world" would also pass on messages to him, implying he's an alleged mystic. The evidence for this is very weak, compared to other alleged mystics; but since other mystics establish a pattern of behavior I wouldn't rule it out. But whether they're mystics or not they've shown they have no credibility since many of their claims are clearly false and can easily be proven false.
There's a significant amount of evidence to raise doubts about the official story, and until the conspiracy theorists can explain how they could have done the controlled demolition there's also problems with their theory. There's also an enormous amount of evidence showing there are many other major unsolved mysteries; but more research and peer review needs to be done before we con conclude for certain that this theory is either true or false, or that some of these unsolved mysteries might be related.
In order to confirm or refute this the scientific community has to take this seriously, with an open mind, instead of relying on pseudo-skeptics that study propaganda to confuse the issue instead of acknowledging unsolved mysteries and using the scientific process, they pretend to support, to solve them. The more they continue doing this the more they show that We Must Become The Media And The Scientists and do it ourselves.
The following are some additional sources on the subject:
Omn Seti Dorothy Eady Reincarnation
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
It's official: European Scientific Journal concludes 9/11 was a controlled demolition 04/30/2020
9/11 Truth.org
Scholars for 9/11 Truth
Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice
Scientists for 9/11 Truth
Scientists for 9/11 Truth: The Citizens’ 9/11 Commission Campaign founded and led by former Senator Mike Gravel (D-Alaska, 1969-1981).
9/11 CitizensWatch
Scholars for 9/11 Truth
Wikipedia: 9/11 conspiracy theories
Larry Silverstein Writes His Own WTC History 09/10/2019
How many people worked at the World Trade Center on September 11? September 2014
9/11 destruction “controlled demolition” — fact or fiction? 11/24/2017
The New York Times: THE NATION; Figuring What It Would Take to Take Down a Tower 03/21/1993 The columns, 21 on each face of each tower, are nearly 10 feet apart, center to center. The World Trade Center's towers were also built to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707 jet, the largest flying at the time of the center's design. The plane was assumed to be fresh out of Kennedy International Airport, fully loaded and carrying full tanks of fuel. While such a crash would cause great damage to the building, the design is such that the building would not topple. Lynn S. Beedle, director of the Council on Tall Buildings and the Urban Habitat, said: "With one bomb, it would be difficult. If it were big enough, it would be possible. There is a demolition method, but that involves putting explosives all through the building, on each column." But he said that if the job required a bomb bigger than the one used at the trade center, "I think people would mostly think in terms of security measures," as opposed to stronger buildings.
How do you demolish a skyscraper? 11/30/2012 However, carrying out such a demolition involves painstaking preparation. It can take up to six months to survey the structure and prepare it for the blast by removing non-load bearing walls, weakening support structures and fitting the charges. Clearing up debris afterwards can take up to two months.
Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice: Evidence The buildings have been investigated and found to be safe in an assumed collision with a large jet airliner (Boeing 707-DC 8) traveling at 600 miles per hour. Analysis indicates that such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building and would not endanger the lives and safety of occupants not in the immediate area of impact. --City in the Sky, p 131
Who really blew up the twin towers? 09/05/2006
Their iconoclastic positions have
Pollution made COVID-19 worse. Now, lockdowns are clearing the air. 04/07/2020
The Pandemic Has Led to a Huge, Global Drop in Air Pollution 03/28/2020
Before-and-after photos show the dramatic effect lockdowns are having on pollution around the world 04/29/2020
New Research Links Air Pollution to Higher Coronavirus Death Rates 04/07/2020
The Alien Abduction: Pascagoula man says he had an encounter with aliens 01/14/2019
September 11th As It Unfolds - FAA and NORAD Tapes 05/0/2020
Why Crop Circles Are NOT Man Made 04/09/2020 https://www.reddit.com/r/ufo/comments/gdmain/why_so_few_arrests_for_crop_circles_makers_is/
S10.E04 Easter Island Mysteries of a Lost World I WBC TV 01/13/2019
COVID-19 Sparks a Rebirth of the Local Farm Movement 05/21/2020
In Japan, Allowed To Grow Hybrids Of Humans And Animals 08/02/2019
Serpo: Consistencies: 1) Interview with EBE-2: March 5th, 1983 at Los Alamos National Labs
Does anyone have the transcript for Reagan's briefing on Roswell? 05/24/2020
VA gave hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 to 1,300 veterans 05/22/2020
New Yahoo News/YouGov poll shows coronavirus conspiracy theories spreading on the right may hamper vaccine efforts 05/22/2020
'They're all forced to listen to us' It began as a tiny internet film attacking the 'lies' surrounding 9/11. Now, millions of people have heard its message. Like it or loathe it, you can't ignore Loose Change, says Ed Pilkington 01/27/2007
15 bewildering conspiracy theories that celebrities think are true 11/15/2019
A Tour Of Silicon Valley With Jacques Vallee 2018
Dr. Steven Greer: On May 21, 2014, we received a cache of Top Secret documents related to “Project Aquarius”, a purported Majestic 12 (MJ-12) covert project related to UFOs/ETs.
Coronavirus Bracelets Are Ready to Snitch on Workers 05/25/2020
David Icke says shock 9/11 report exposes 'cover up' on third tower 'demoliton' 05/1/2020 Mark Loizeaux, who runs one of the world's leading demolition companies, Controlled Demolition Incorporated, said it would take months to design and prepare the structure for placement of the charges. He told the BBC: "It's noisy. There's just no way to get around it. You go in, you knock out usually all the walls on the floors where you place explosives, gut them." "The amount of air that's displaced will break windows easily. There were a lot of broken windows mainly through impact debris. “But I didn't see windows broken on the backs of building, only where debris falling from the towers struck it.
Council Member Mayfield Pushes 9/11 Conspiracy Theory In Facebook Post 04/17/2018
