Non-violent grass roots reform and Democracy: Is this for real? Or Insane Reverse Psychology Experiment Or Research?

Are we living in the Twilight Zone?

Is the alleged Trump Presidency actually a Reality TV Show?

Or is this part of a reverse psychology effort to spur opposition for some insane reason?

Even the Trump administration can't be so asinine and clueless that they didn't realize that Melania's jacket wouldn't create an uproar outraging people; can they?

It's not likely that they can be so clueless, and it's virtually guaranteed that they aren't, but they are that asinine, since even if there is some kind of insane reverse psychology effort to spur opposition so that the public would overthrow him it wouldn't be nearly as effective as just starting to tell the truth about whatever scams they've been conducting, and it would still be asinine!

Three years ago when Trump began his campaign by calling Mexicans rapists everyone thought it was insane and he had no chance of winning; and they were right, or at least they would have been right, if the media covered the campaign in a remotely reasonable manner! Instead one celebrity after another makes one insane blunder after another, and not only should they know better but they do!

There's just way to much insanity going on and an enormous amount of it so foolish that it can't possibly be all true. Not only do Melania's handlers have to know better than to let her wear that jacket unless they really are trying to stir up an insane debate arguing back and forth; but they also had to know better than to give her two prepared speeches written by Michelle Obama's speech writers! At least Michelle Obama did a better job pretending to believe and write her own speeches!

Corey Lewandowski also had to know better than to say "Womp Womp" when arguing about the insane immigration policies he's supporting; and other politicians that are repeatedly referring to unarmed families with small children have to know better than to call them "invaders" or saying "Shame on these parents for bringing their children while they break the law."

They have to know that they're fleeing oppression and that the United States government has been supporting these tyrannical regimes for decades, assuming they actually want to! A few of them can be so insane and crude but there are still enough rational Republican't that know that this can only lead to disaster, and they can come up with a much more effective way of dealing with the insane Trump administration, assuming they actually want to do that too.

But even if the Republican Party and the clownish Trump administration was so insane that they can't control there own rhetoric or stop themselves from sending Melania out with that jacket that she almost certainly wouldn't have chosen without consulting with her handlers, back in 2015 a large portion of the Democratic establishment had to be aware of just how horrible a candidates Hillary was. And she should also have known better than to say "I have experience with men off the reservation," or to take temper tantrums when confronted by Black Lives Matter in front of the camera, and more absurd blunders than I can keep track of.

They knew that she laughed hysterically about Gaddafi years before the campaign saying "We came, we saw, he died." They knew that she made an enormous amount of other blunders and that she was an outrageous nominee that had incredibly high negative poll ratings. They had to know that giving up the nomination process months before the primaries even began by putting the entire Democratic establishment behind such an outrageous candidates with enormous amounts of baggage and corrupt ties in addition to all her absurd blunders was a foolish thing to do!

And yet, except for an handful of candidates, that got no coverage at all, and Bernie Sanders who fell in line when the script called for it, the entire Democratic establishment agreed not to run and endorsed her, setting the stage for the insane Trump presidency!

Edit 07/30/2018: If their goal is to keep people laughing then they're succeeding with one insane event after another. They couldn't come up with more insane foriegn policy activities if they tried to which just might mean that's what they're doing!

Edit 07/13/2018: This charade just keeps getting more insane, or even worse it really isn't a charade, although that may be increasingly less likely. Trump's absurd comments about the British Prime Minister sound like something that really would come out of a baby. But it's now so routine that most people are starting to beleive that it is the new normal, although the political establishment clearly must know better. But of course it would avhe to be a massive conspiracy theory to justify this insanity.

Even if some don't accept the possibility that this is an insane charade, Peter Strzok admitted they had information about Trump which they claim implicates him with Russia, yet they withheld if from the public, and they also had an enormous amount of information on Hillary Clinton, sending out mixed messages about her. With or without an insane conspiracy theory the only candidates they provide a significant amount of coverage for are all involved in an epidemic level of scandals, with the possible exception of Bernie Sanders, who they didn't provide nearly as much coverage as the ones supporting Wall Street, and treated him like he was fringe because he represented the grassroots.

There should be no doubt the entire democratic system has turned into a "Tragedy and Farce!"

Edit 07/07/2018: Since I posted this things continue to go insane almost like an insane reality TV show and instead of making this absurd conspiracy theory look like it can't possibly be true they continue to make the official so absurd that it looks more like it's scripted, fitting many conspiracy theories that we're not supposed to trust more than a rational government and press that is credible. They still haven't stopped maintaining war propaganda that makes absolutely no sense about North Korea escalating their nuclear research if you believe the mainstream press, without reporting on the lies that led us to this confrontation in the first place. This fits into the same pattern of behavior that is clearly designed to maintain the threat of war indefinitely, or as the Bible says, "Wars and Rumors of Wars," even when there's no need for it.

Not that this is some kind of prophetic prediction; it's easy to recognize a pattern of deception and predict that it will continue.

Even though the absurd conspiracy theory I mentioned previously in 2016 and linked to below should still be falling apart Scott Pruitt's statement that “I believe you are serving as President today because of God’s providence,” only seems to make it more viable in a clownish manner like everything else they do which doesn't make any sense.

If God exists and this is how he accomplishes his goals, what could he possibly be trying to accomplish?

Now, almost like clock-work we jump from one insane obsession du jour to another where there are political operatives manipulating the public from both sides lining them up to divide and rule and both political parties are routinely bending over backwards to represent the same oligarchies that finance their campaigns!

There's no doubt that there's something totally insane about the political establishment that is insanely obsessed with jumping from one clownish satire to another almost as if it's all on schedule, or perhaps, if this is a Twilight Zone conspiracy, an enormous amount of these obsession du jours are on schedule!

But why? What could be so important that they would put on this insane charade, or if it's not a completely planned charade, which to some degree I'm sure it's not, although it is partially planned, then why can't they even do a better job pretending to represent the public? I know they've been doing plenty of research, some of which was exposed in the E--Mail leaks and a lot of which I've written about in the past which clearly indicates that they do know to do a better job scamming the public yet, they'rte not!

Is it just power for the sake of power? Probably not entirely but there's an astronomical amount of evidence to indicate that it might be somewhat close, and they might be relying on all this insanity to distract from other undisclosed motives, which may not be completely secret.

One of the things that they've clearly learned is that both parties can get away with many of the same scams as long as they use the right tactics to appease the voters that accept the choice between two parties and are divided up into three groups, those that think their Party, either Democratic or Republican, is right, or at least the lesser of two evils and so called independents that accept the duopoly and just keep jumping back and forth falling for slightly different scams from one election cycle to the next.

Amazingly a large portion of Party loyalists are routinely outraged when the other party does something wrong but make incredibly bad excuses that any rational person can see through, including when Sarah Huckabee Sanders expressed outrage because she was asked to leave a restaurant and over Maxine Waters call for protest, which many people seem to think goes to far; however this call to civility, from Sanders and other Republicans, clearly doesn't apply to Trump who has said that he'd like to punch protesters in the face and would pay the legal fees to those who do and many more things so outrageous that I can't keep track of them.

How can there be any doubt that Trump is clearly inciting retaliation? By doing it in such an obvious and clownish manner that it's hard to imagine he couldn't have expected retaliation and that it's exactly what he wanted. This is part of the reason why it should be increasingly hard to rule out a staged satire for some insane reason!

Not that the Democrats are nearly as much better as they pretend to be; and when Trump says that this problem was created by Democrats he's actually partly right although when ever he gets something right he seems to distort it so bad that it seems completely wrong! It's not to long ago that Barack Obama was labeled the "Deporter in Chief." A closer look indicates that he wasn't always as bad as some of the rhetoric against him but he didn't do nearly as much as he could have and supported Hillary Clinton who supported draconian policies of her husband and pushed for more of the same as Secretary of State, and as I reminded people in my last article, she said, “We have to send a clear message, just because your child gets across the border, that doesn’t mean the child gets to stay. So, we don’t want to send a message that is contrary to our laws or will encourage more children to make that dangerous journey.” (06/18/2014).

While Obama was helping to rig the primary for Hillary Clinton who, at best did a bad job pretending to defend immigrants, like Karla Ortiz who she promised that she would protect even though it contradicted her political record, Bernie Sanders posted an article, "Stop the Separation of Immigrant Children and Families," 04/04/2018 which clearly indicates that although the Obama administration wasn't nearly as extreme as the current one, the separation of children from their parents isn't new. But now that Trump is doing it on a much larger scale they're actually reporting it!

If the Obama administration hadn't been part of the obvious and corrupt effort to rig the nomination for Hilary Clinton then Trump ever could have won in the first place!

The Trump administration battle with North Korea and how they allegedly negotiated a peace agreement, as far as it goes, is even more clownish and unbelievable indicating the possibility that it might be staged for some insane reason; as I previously pointed out in Looming North Korea Nuclear Apocalypse Result of Incompetence? Or Staged? this situation was a result of a long list of lies, including the claim that North Korea was the one that constantly broke previous deals. The Clinton administration negotiated a deal with North Korea with Jimmy Carters help and Bush is the one that broke that deal and Obama followed up with his own clownish rhetoric about North Korea hacking Sony pictures when they ridiculed them.

Both Political Parties have been carrying out a long series of activities that have clearly not been designed to create peace in North Korea or many other parts of the world, including the Mid-East and Israel which is constantly oppressing people in the West Bank and Gaza with approval from both Parties.

In the article about the the "Looming North Korea Nuclear Apocalypse" points out that this is as insane as the rest of the Trump administration and that it brings about actions that seem similar to the Apocalypse, or an incredible satirical version of it that's hard to believe; and it speculates on the possibility that if UFOs really are from other planets, and they were involved in the moving of massive megaliths thousands of years ago that this might be part of a far-fetched long term plan of some sort. The moving of the embassy to Jerusalem in an equally clownish manner also seems to bring about some aspects of the Apocalypse, only that was also done in a clownish manner like everything else in the Trump administration as well as I pointed out in Evangelical belief in the Apocalypse, accurate or not, is shaping policy which also points out that religious support is helping to create a self-fulfilling prophecy about the restoration of ancient Jerusalem, which Evangelicals consider necessary before Christ can return.

This sounds insane, of course, and to a large part it is insane; however the official version of truth has been steadily becoming more insane for decades; and there should be no doubt that they could have avoided an enormous amount of disasters that have happened and dealt with the ones they couldn't avoid much more effectively if they acted rationally; yet they chose not to even though it not even in the best interests of the wealthy elites to have our society collapse which it will if our leaders continue acting in such an idiotic manner. I responded to during the election, when I noticed that that was also insane, and I doubted if it could get much stupider, in another article Yes Virginia There Is A Trump And Clinton Conspiracy which started out with credible evidence about how the media was controlling the coverage to ensure that only candidates that they approved of would get coverage, which was true and didn't rely on what some people would consider fringe conspiracy theory, since it was based on public sources that aren't being denied by the political establishment or media.

That article went on to recognize that, although fringe conspiracy theories about Hillary Clinton being the "Whore of Babylon" couldn't possibly be completely true, Hillary had far more characteristics attributed to the "Whore of Babylon" than a rational skeptic might expect. This went on to speculate about an absurd fake apocalypse that they're intentionally creating which should have fallen apart but things have continued to become even more insane since then continuing with the Al Smith dinner and then with Trump winning the election, only because the Democrats rigged the nomination for such a horrible candidate!

Instead of falling apart like that theory should have, if anything it has gotten far stronger, although it's still vague, and if there's something to it it still needs work.

Donald Trump's rhetoric about a "Space Force" only adds to the insanity, but is it be completely false? There's no way that it could work out as he seems to imply, like everything else he comes up with; however we do have far more advanced technology developing at an incredibly rapid pace, even though our entire political and media establishment is going insane. This couldn't possibly be happening unless people behind the scenes are acting far more rationally than they let on!

But if there is something to it any information they give to the public seems to be coming in an incredibly unreliable manner from sources that have no credibility and are obviously mixing it up with an enormous amount of false information that can't possibly be true.

This doesn't mean that we should jump on the band wagon of bizarre conspiracy theories; I tried to be a rational skeptic since I first started posting this semi-regular series of articles, and continue to; however the official version of truth is to irrational and contradictory to be completely true, and large portions of it are routinely proven to be false.

One of the theories, which I would be a little skeptical of claims that Trump call for Space Force a Step towards Disclosure of USAF Secret Space Program 06/2/2018 claims there's already a "Space Force" of some sort, which I wouldn't completely rule out if alien contact has been made but I would want stronger evidence before believing the details, and it's certainly not a guarantee. Rational Wiki refers to him a wingnut and they make fun of him; however I would be skeptical of them, as well since they don't act as rationally as they claim like a lot of other high profile skeptics that ridicule others for not using scientific methods but then when evidence doesn't support their own beliefs they don't either. After looking through enough of this research I've come to suspect, as I've written in past articles, that they might be disclosing parts of the truth intentionally mixed up with an enormous amount of misinformation to confuse the issue.

If this is true then figuring out what's going on will have to involve a lot of slow fact checking and learning about a lot of different subjects. If they want to withhold disclosure until it suits their purposes using this method can, and perhaps already has, been very effective.

In one of my recent articles, Researching Poor, Slaves, Prisoners, To Benefit Ruling Class With Alien Technology? I cited Philip Corso's book "The Day After Roswell" where he claims that he worked with alien technology sharing it with multinational corporations and other credible sources including mainstream media reports that exposed China's use of prisoners for research and to get organs for transfer, often without full consent. There's no doubt that some unethical use of prisoners or poor people around the world for research has been going on for Decades, as Harvard University ethics researcher Harriet Washington, who I cited previously exposed, in her books "Medical Apartheid" and "Deadly Monopolies."

As far-fetched as this sounds additional evidence might have come from the article, Gates Foundation is spearheading the neoliberal plunder of African agriculture 01/21/2016, which reports that the Gate's Foundation is promoting Monsanto and DuPont GMOs agaisnt the will of many people in a manner that can't be sustained by local people and will put them under the control of corporations that hold patents for these GMOs and it will also add to the use of them as research subjects.

If Philip Corso is partly right then a large portion of computer technology, including the technology that Bill Gates allegedly developed may have actually come from alien technology developed as a result of the Roswell crash or other contact with aliens. In "The Day After Roswell" Chapter Fifteen he writes, "General Trudeau encouraged me to start contacting plastics and ceramics manufacturers, especially Monsanto and Dow, to find out who was doing research on super-tenacity materials, especially at university laboratories," and he goes on to refer to "contacts he set up for me at Du Pont and Monsanto" which clearly indicates that if there is something to this then GMOs are also almost certainly a result of alien technology and they're using us for research purposes.

There are also recent reports about forcing immigrant children in these detainment centers to take drugs against their wishes and that they're receiving reckless or dangerous medical care, which could be compatible with the theory that they're being used for research, assuming additional details are provided.

Another major problem with the official version of truth is that if the elite ruling class is looking out for their own best interests and they're acting mostly if not entirely on greed are they so fanatical that they believe their own rhetoric about Climate Change and are willing to play chicken with the survival of the planet? Some of them certainly could be but they can't all be that stupid or insane; and unless the more rational faction was suicidal they wouldn't be willing to allow a clownish effort like Donald Trump and Scott Pruitt escalate the destruction of the environment.

They might be able to profit off the destruction of third world countries and abandoned inner cities for decades if not centuries but eventually this destruction will also destroy themselves, and they have to know it!

In Hurricane Apocalypse Coming With or Without Fringe Conspiracy Theory and Could Steve Bannon Be Providing Propaganda To Enable Climate Change Research Project? I pointed out the obvious that if Climate Change is partly created by man then it's possible to have some degree of control of the environment and they might be able to experiment with it. And dating back to James Hansen's warnings in the late eighties that Climate Change is real and a speech to Congress from Lyndon Johnson in the sixties, along with more recent comments by Michio Kaku some of this experimentation might be possible or it might already be going on; and if there has been an unknown advanced intelligence around for thousands of years dating back to when ancient megaliths were moved that couldn't have been moved by primitive civilizations, then they could be involved.

If this is partly true, are they planning to keep it secret forever? They're certainly not disclosing it in the most honest and effective manner. If it's not true then there still has to be another explanation for all the current insanity so the official version of truth is still flawed. But if there is some truth to it and if some of the alleged predictions from the Apocalypse do seem to be coming partially true, even if it is in a clownish manner could that be part of a controlled disclosure effort? Could they have convinced some of the people involved to go along with this by telling them that eventually it would be for the benefit of all, which technically is possible in the future, but not in the present when they're continuing to sacrifice and enormous amount of people for their lies?

If there are some people that want full disclosure eventually involved in this conspiracy then they might be more willing to cooperate if they thought there was plan to end with that even if it's never intended to come true, they might be more cooperative if they think it's going to be disclosed. Could this be part of some insane reverse psychology effort to incite political organization?

NO!

Or at least not a good one that would be the most effective way of disclosing it; that would involve a much more effective method to teach rational behavior instead of trying to indoctrinate people to go along with their agenda even though it's against the best interest of the majority of the public! However it's conceivable that they think that a reverse psychology effort to incite reform from the grassroots that involves letting people recognize that they've been had and stand up for their own rights might be what some of them chose to believe.

Do you ever wonder whether Trump voters actually believe his ridiculous lies; and if so how they came to believe them and what it would take to convince them otherwise?

It's not just the ridiculous excuses that they use to justify treatment of detainees; but everything that has been going on for years since the election and even the clownish behavior that was on the Apprentice, which was gawd awful, or at least the clips on Cable News are, and I can't even imagine why anyone would even watch one episode.

There's one story after another about the working class people that voted for Trump continuing to say they still support him, with a few exceptions even though his policies are only making things worse for them. Louisiana Crawfishermen somehow came to the conclusion that he would help them before the election even though he was promising to eliminate environmental protection, which is what they needed, and things are only getting worse for them; Iowa farmers are suffering from his trade policies; the so-called salvation of Carrier jobs in Indiana was partially falling apart as he was getting publicity for saving them, then when the publicity went away most of the other jobs were shipped overseas; West Virginia cola miners are losing their health care, and not saving their jobs which was never a credible promise; veterans are also losing their health care, and the list just keeps getting longer.

How much will it take for his supporters to recognize that he never intended to look out for their best interests in the first place?

Many of these same voters are indifferent, or supportive of the oppression of of minorities, whether it's the immigrants being separated from their families, minorities being shot and killed by police or many other stories. Is this support for others going to keep them happy when they realize that these policies aren't going to do anything to help their own problems? Some of them have already demonstrated that they're willing to support depriving minorities of their rights, but they can't seem to see that they're also losing their own rights in a more subtle way, for now. How far can this scapegoating go?

I'm not convinced there are as many of them as the media implies with their polls; however I doubt if they're completely making it up. But the reason those that do believe these idiotic lies is almost certainly a result of their early upbringing in dysfunctional homes where they were raised to believe what they were told from their leaders from an early age; and this was almost certainly backed up by intimidation tactics to keep kids in line.

This is especially common in religious households where parents use corporal punishment to teach their children to behave from an early age and often do so in an emotional manner. They learn to go along with the crowd and not to question authority, or at least the authorities from their own group blindly believing incredibly bad lies as a group and gradually changing when it suits their leaders purposes as they manipulate them. Social Psychologists, including many working with the CIA have understood this for decades.

If this is the case, and at least to some degree the child psychology is, then in order to teach them to think rationally they need to go through a slow reeducation process that would be most effective with young people if they could stop the abusive upbringing.

However, in the short term, it's much easier to control them using demagogues, like Donald Trump and religious evangelicals or televangelists, who also come up with the most absurd scams that the faithful fall for. These Trump supporters are essentially cult followers that have little or no critical thinking skills of their own and the older ones may never develop them; however younger ones might be more inclined to believe they've been had if they see how everything is back firing and it's more likely to work if entire groups of people are coming to the same conclusion together.

This might point his followers in the right direction and fanatical psychologists working with the CIA might be inclined to try it, and have tried other extreme things in the past, however moving them all as a cult won't teach critical thinking skills, that will take much longer.

As I said before if they were looking out for the best interest of the majority of the public there's no way they would go about this using insane conspiracies like this; instead they would have started any disclosure effort long ago in an honest manner, teaching critical thinking skills and reducing child abuse so kids aren't taught to blindly go along with insane mobs or fall for pathetic scams like Hillary Clinton's Donald Trump's or anyone else's!

If this is somewhat close to the truth then there certainly a lot of other details that need to be worked out and probably mistakes that need to be fixed, which would have to be done with disclosures from people that have access to the real truth, although any facts from them would have to be checked carefully.

If this isn't close to the truth, which I suspect many people would doubt, then the official version of truth isn't much, if any, better and we should still demand disclosure of whatever is the truth and check the facts slowly and carefully!