Which version of the "Deep State" is the real thing?

Last Tuesday Morning Joe reported that 74% of the public believed in the "Deep State," treating this theory as if it's fringe and there must be something wrong with the public if they believe this absurd propaganda!

Then they quickly moved on to a discussion with Robert Gibbs about how McDonald's is trying to cut emissions by 36% acting as if there's no sense of irony!

See the incredibly obvious hypocrisy?

If you don't, relax, I won't make you admit you missed my point.

Robert Gibbs is one of many administration officials that routinely move from corporate America to the government and back again, in positions that the vast majority of us, without political connections, haven't got a chance to get hired at. This is standard operating procedure; and it's not limited to the government it also happens in the media, which controls which candidates get media coverage ensuring that only those the oligarchy approve of can get the name recognition they need to get elected, and this isn't fringe conspiracy theory either!

An enormous amount of the evidence showing that almost all, if not all administration officials, from any given candidate that gets enough media coverage, has connections within the political establishment that caters overwhelmingly to multinational corporations that finance virtually all campaigns, and most of this can be found on Wikipedia or other sources that are easy to find, assuming you actually look for it. Robert Gibbs apparently worked for John Kerry before, joining the Obama Campaign, but after leaving the Kerry Campaign he joined a little known "527 political group formed to stop the 2004 presidential campaign of Howard Dean which launched attack ads against Dean," (Wikipedia: Robert Gibbs) who was pretending to be a progressive at that time, then after leaving the Obama administration it wasn't long before he got a high profile job working for McDonald's, one of the oligarchies that virtually controls our government.

The government isn't always completely controlled by one or two oligarchies, although it often seems that way, but it comes close; sometimes some of the oligarchies compete against each other; but workers rights groups, antiwar groups, environmentalists and other human rights organizations have little or no influence compared to these multinational corporations.

Amazon hired Obama’s former press secretary Jay Carney to work for them shortly after he left office; Josh Earnest was hired by MSNBC as a commentator; both Sylvia Mathews Burwell and Hillary Clinton had close ties to Walmart and the list goes on and on. Timothy Geithner had ties to the banking industry before he was hired to oversee them, then after leaving office he joined the Council on Foreign Relations as a "distinguished fellow," and developed close ties to a private equity firm; Eric Holder worked for Covington & Burling, who represented many banks that he didn't prosecute as Attorney General before he became Attorney General and rejoined them afterwards making a fortune while they were never held accountable for the financial collapse in 2008 or many other things.

You can find many more administration members moving within the political establishment and large corporations in the lists of presidential administrations listed below or you can find the same thing by searching for Congressmen and their aides or the media as I have done several times in the past including some in articles s also listed below. Just last Tuesday about twelve hours after this conversation on Morning Joe Illinois nominated two representatives of the oligarchy for both major parties including a billionaire heir to a hotel empire and a private equity mogul, this is now becoming increasingly common after nominating Trump and Clinton for president, and previously nominating Bush and Gore or Kerry, all representing the wealthy and all very wealthy themselves while pretending to defend the middle class, although they no longer even try to do a good job pretending.



There should be little or no doubt that the political establishment, multinational corporations, six oligarchs controlling the mass media, and a handful of the highest profile other media outlets, also owned by billionaires are all controlled by a fraction of one percent of the public; and they can ensure that only candidates they support can get name recognition enabling them to get elected. Four years ago there was even a scientific study to tell people familiar with alternative media outlets already knew, that the US Is an Oligarchy Not a Democracy 04/14/2014; this was followed up be claims that their data was flawed, of course; however anyone that takes the time to look at the facts knows that the rich have much more influence than the poor or the middle class.

There's some evidence to indicate that scientific studies financed by people with an agenda can be influenced by that agenda; although in order to recognize this it is often necessary to read some of the studies to find them. The alternative is to trust an expert that you know or one chosen by others, perhaps the mass media, which will make you dependent on the conclusions of that expert.

Then at least one pundit from Morning Joe went on to say that the public needs to trust the FBI, now that they're dealing with the Austin serial bomber, to protect us, and at least one pundit on Morning Joe even went so far as to say that if there is such a thing as the "Deep State" that is what they need to protect us! No doubt some of the fringe conspiracy theorists might argue that this might be another false flag; and of course skeptics, rational or not, would justifiably say "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."

As of this writing I don't know much about the serial bomber, and Tuesdays conversation on Morning Joe ridiculing those that believe in a version of the "Deep State" and claiming that if there was such a thing wouldn't have known that within a day he would be dead. However there's plenty of good research, without going into fringe conspiracy theories to show that the political establishment has been ignoring many of the best research to show how to reduce violence, like they do in Europe which has far fewer murders or violent crime than us.

According to Wikipedia's Lists of United States cities by crime rate, 250,000+ scroll down for smaller cities there are at least a hundred and twenty-five cities in this country with over twice the national average murder rate, which is sixty-five percent higher than Europe's average murder rate, and five times the murder rate of some of the states that do the best job providing child care education and preventing child abuse from escalating to further violence. Some of these cities have at least three to four times the national average and a few are as high as eight to fifteen times the national average. East St. Louis is about seventy-five per hundred thousand; while some of the least violent countries in Europe are less than one!



I've pointed out in numerous past articles that the media and political establishment routinely ignore the best research about how early child abuse leads to escalating violence or how cutting funds to schools and outsourcing jobs so working class people don't have the resources to address social problems; so I'll provide links below for those of you who haven't read it; but there's little or no doubt that the political establishment isn't making rational decisions that will help solve these problems. Instead of spending more on education they spend money on legal expenses to avoid court challenges to discrimination lawsuits and they have no qualms about spending enormous amounts of money on prisons, courts and wars based on lies even though they don't solve these problems, instead making them worse.

None of this would be what most people refer to as fringe conspiracy theory, and those who are willing can easily take the time to confirm some of the research behind it; however this sin't what they media establishment typically think of when they refer to a Deep State, although it is evidence of an oligarchy system, and could potentially be evidence of a more complicated conspiracy theory. Not that the most irrational theories are likely to hold up, though.

What the traditional media actually prefers to debunk isn't well thought out conspiracy theories or rational reviews of policies that work, that check facts and cite reliable sources; instead they prefer to debunk the exagerated stereotypes about the Deep State or perhaps the Illuminati.

In Cable News, that gets much more attention from the majority of the public they rely much more on ridicule and stereotyping with appeals to emotion; however this lower profile article, Is the Deep State real — and is it really at war with Donald Trump? 02/02/2018, does a slightly better job addressing the subject, although it still ignores many of the most important facts, and it is unlikely to nearly as widely read as Cable News is watched. At least them mention C. Wright Mills and Peter Dale Scott, who most people have never heard of, and they also mention a few of the most extreme activities carried out by the CIA that happened decades ago and were admit ed to, but they still dismiss, downplay or mostly just ignore the best research.

Not all conspiracy theorists that research the Deep State are as irrational as the mainstream media wants us to believe which is why they avoid covering many of the most important details. David Talbot, Fletcher Prouty, James Douglass, Noam Chomsky, Mark Lane, C. Wright Mills, Peter Dale Scott and many more are among the good researchers that raise major doubts about the official version of truth being presented by the mainstream media, which is presumably why they prefer to ignore them instead of ridiculing them. This is especially effective because it takes time for many people to read the details, and as Mark Lane reported Allen Dulles said when preparing the incredibly incompetent Warren Commission Report "People don't read," implying that he could get away with presenting this to the public since the majority of the public wouldn't check the facts. Unfortunately he was, for the most part right; however there have always been a few people who did read and check the facts including David Lifton who confronted Dulles, in the 1960s, while he went on tour in an attempt to defend the Warren reports. Dulles attempted to ridicule him but he wasn't among a crowd that was willing to go along with it and this was one of the last times, if not the last time he went to a public forum to speak where people would be willing to ask questions.

However, the mass media was much more willing to go along with the propaganda to convince the public that Lee Harvey Oswald was a lone gunman, even after the House Select Committee on Assassinations found that it had to be at least two shooters, they tried to patch together the original Warren Report. It's no surprise that a lot of people don't believe the official version on JFK's assassination; the big surprise is why so many people do; but that shows how effective relentless propaganda can be, and it's limitations.

The traditional media and government routinely say that keeping this information secret is necessary for national security reasons; however people that are familiar with lower profile declassified documents, news reports, often in alternative media outlets, or library books that don't get nearly as much attention are well aware of a long history of using this excuse to cover up enormous amounts of corruption and the fact that we fight one war after another based on lies.

The government and legal system has apparently made it possible for multinational corporations to take advantage of proprietary information or trade secrecy laws and non-disclosure agreements to make it illegal for people working for their companies or involved in legal disputes to inform the public about activities they know about. In many cases the public might not be allowed to know whether these laws are being used to cover up illegal or dangerous activities, although you would think this would clearly be illegal. recently there have been a few higher profile admissions about how these could be used to cover up sexual assault settlemnts with tax payer money by Congressmen and Trump's lawsuits against porn stars, reality TV contestants and models.

Recently on Anderson Cooper 360 CNN March 15, 2018 5:00pm-6:00pm PDT a friend of Michael Cohen, David Schwartz, discussed Stormy Daniel's contract saying, "it's a valid contract, as long as ec, llc signed that contract. These non-disclosure agreements are signed every single day. They're signed by CEOs, by legislators, doctors, lawyers, TV personalities." No one disputed this on Anderson Cooper, nor is it likely that anyone will, since a search of the internet for more information about these non-disclosure agreements indicates that David Schwartz is right, although most people don't recognize the implications of all these non-disclosure agreements.



These agreements involved keeping information secret that might have influenced the election; it's virtually guaranteed that the Emails released by Wikileaks were also subject to non-disclosure agreements; and they were also about psychological manipulation of the voters for the benefit of Hillary Clinton, her campaign and her campaign contributors. The traditional media expects us to believe that we shouldn't worry about all the attempts to manipulate the election exposed by Wikileaks and instead worry about the fact that computers were allegedly hacked by Russia. What's hardly even mentioned is that many of the most important issues are never discussed at all by the mainstream media.

I went into this more previously in Proprietary information is, by definition, a conspiracy Duuh; this is almost never mentioned in the mainstream media but when ever there's a major disaster or evidence of corporate corruption that might lead to it there's almost always information that was kept secret prior to that, often with the help of non-disclosure agreements or trade secrecy laws; and there's also an enormous amount of reporting from low profile sources to indicate that they're routinely being used to cover up an enormous amount of fraud.

Corner cutting that precedes many major controversies that eventually lead to deaths and lawsuits afterwards including toxic carbon monoxide in Ford Explorers, Firestone tire's shredding, keyless ignition's shutting off leading to accidents and presumably hundreds if not thousands more lawsuits that are reported over the decades briefly before being forgotten by the mainstream media. In many cases there are often people that know about corner cutting ahead of time sometimes coming forward as whistle-blowers, often facing retaliation and threats of legal action, possibly for violating non-disclosure agreements. In some cases they try to minimize the coverage of these agreements and hesitate to sue if it might expose standard practices, especially if it will make them public and guarantee even more losses.

These lawsuits are often settled, possibly with the signing of more non-disclosure agreements to prevent the public from knowing what went on or knowing how to prevent it from happening again. They also might prevent additional victims from knowing they might have a legitimate claim.

After Lisa McPherson died twenty years ago the Church of Scientology avoided prosecution and settled a civil suit with a non-disclosure agreement banning discussion of the event; then there have been dozens of disclosure about practices by Church of Scientology that are manipulative and involve enslavement abuse and much more, yet the government does little or nothing; after an accident with a Walmart truck Tracy Morgan initially spoke critically about Walmart but after the settlement he claimed they treated him very well; but he refused to discuss the details thanks to a non-disclosure agreement; many of us familiar with Walmart's practices and how they fight lawsuits tooth and nail find it extremely hard to believe that he didn't get much more in his settlement than any non-celebrity could ever hope to; and there are many other stories that pass through the headlines briefly which we don't know the whole story of.

If there's no Deep State or other conspiracies why would there be so many laws designed to prevent the majority of the public from knowing how decisions are being made.

And who's going to expose the Deep State?

Is Donald Trump?

Amazingly during the twenty-sixteen election there was an enormous amount of propaganda, mostly on alternative media outlets like Breitbart, Infowars and occasional Fox News or Donald Trump himself claiming that he was the one that would take on the Deep State and this was often backed up by an enormous number of online accounts spreading propaganda to back this up, perhaps this is part of the alleged Russian propaganda effort or something but the results are the same; and it's incredibly hard to believe that anyone would believe this bad propaganda, yet there are an enormous number of Trump supporters that still seem to think he's going to "drain the swamp."



How can even one person be stupid enough to believe that Trump is going to stand up to the oligarchy or the Deep State?

What makes anyone even think that Donald Trump sin't even a part of the Deep State? Do people believe that because he comes up with an enormous amount of loud mouth complaints about the Deep State or that he shows up on the alternative media outlets that mainstream media tells us are fringe like Infowars or Breitbart that he's not part of the Deep State? For that matter do they believe that Steve Bannon isn't part of the Deep State?

Steve Bannon is a former Wall Street investment banker; how often do politicians or media pundits like Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump pretend to stand up the same business interests they routinely work with only to show their true objectives after getting in office?

Donald Trump has always been part of the business world he pretends to stand up to and there was never any reason to believe he would keep his promises to stand up to them. His sister is even a Judge, which is a job that those without political connections could never get. This should have been incredibly obvious even during the campaign, but now that he's filled his cabinet with multimillionaires and billionaires any doubt there might have been should be gone!

The traditional media has been aware for decades that they can ensure candidates they support get an enormous amount of coverage and those they oppose can, in most cases, especially at the national or statewide level of large states, ensure that those they oppose never get the name recognition they need to get elected by simply declining to cover them. This isn't secret and many people in the grassroots movements that support alternative candidates are fully aware of this. Billionaires or celebrities routinely get all the coverage they need to get elected or at least have a chance, but those that get support from the grassroots levels or organizations that protect the environment, workers rights defend human rights or local control of schools only get coverage after an enormous amount of work, and then it isn't nearly as much.

The mainstream media gave Donald Trump enormous amounts of coverage for decades enabling him to get the name recognition he needed to be a viable candidate. They provided him a job at the Apprentice where he was able to develop an enormous following then they provided obsession coverage during the 2016 election enabling him to get even more support, even if he did criticize the media, and they criticized him, or perhaps because of it. The Republican Party has been studying how to manipulate their voters for decades, instead of addressing their legitimate concerns some of this has been virtually confessed to by Frank Luntz who's been doing dozens of focus groups to study how to influence voters instead of addressing their concerns for years if not decades, and the Democratic Party has been doing the same, which is why our government and corporate sector have become so extreme. There's good reason to suspect that they've known for quite a while that the voters were susceptible to demagoguery tactics and after being betrayed by traditional politicians manipulating their emotions one time after another they wanted what they perceived as a change.

Frank Luntz and many other political advisers were well aware that the right wing followers of the Republican Party were fed up with being betrayed but had little critical thinking skills that enabled them to know who to blame, and these people have been taught from birth to trust their leaders and have history of blindly following those that they consider their savior. These political operatives also understood that if they pushed the public too far then they might be more inclined to revolt one way or another. Many people from the working class might not realize it but political advisers going back to Machiavelli and earlier have been warning about this and it's even in the Declaration of Independence, which says, "all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed," yet tehy kept pushing their own voters to greater extremes.

Intentionally or not the mainstream media that is now going after Trump with their propaganda is what enabled him to get elected in the first place.

And the oligarchy controls a large portion of the alternative media outlets as well, either directly or indirectly. Most alternative media outlets focus on the smae subjects that are routinely brought up by the mainstream media, although they often provide a different point of view. For example, I'm now writing this about a discussion from Morning Joe; and many other media outlets cover what ever the mainstream media is obsessively covering on any given day, although many of the good ones do this to debunk the spin from the mainstream media.

However an enormous number of alternative media outlets are controlled mostly if not entirely by billionaires or other representatives of the mainstream media, including a few that aren't even hidden. Robert Mercer finances Breitbart; Pierre Omidyar finances the Intercept; and George Soros, the Carnegie Corporation, the Ford Foundation, the J.M. Kaplan Fund and others fund many alternative media outlets including Democracy Now that many people think of as being independent, although if people take time to check the funding pages they might find out otherwise.

So-called protest movements against the oligarchy from both the so-called right and the left (This reference is to left and right side of the congressional aisle falsely assuming that each side represents one segment of the public; actually they learn how to manipulate different segments of the public using different tactics, but turning both against each other) are being financed by billionaires, pretending to stand up to billionaires; and somehow they never manage to get much if any progressive reforms that actually accomplish their alleged goals!

Is it any wonder many people believe this is all a scam to distract the public from what's really going on?

If so then what is really going on?

Are they suicidal? Or delusional?

Because if they're not their current course of action will eventually destroy themselves as well as the rest of us, although the poorest people living in the areas getting the most environmental damage or subject to constant bombings in many parts of the world are guaranteed to go first if they keep on doing business as usual, especially with the escalating insanity in the Trump administration.

If they're not suicidal or delusional then they must have some plan to at least save themselves even if they don't care about the vast majority of the public, or at least they must think they do.

Are they going to terraform another planet so they can live on it with their rapidly developing technology?

Not a chance! And, even though this idea has been thrown out there as a possible solution decades ago by people like Carl Sagan and others, anyone with an once of basic sense knows that if we can't stop ourselves from destroying this planet we can't terraform another one; and I'm sure that when Carl Sagan threw this idea out, he didn't take it that seriously and was presenting it in a sarcastic manner.

By the way how can they be developing so much technology so rapidly if they're behaving in such an insane manner about everything else?

According to the ancient aliens conspiracy theorists, they're using technology that was obtained by aliens that they've been reverse engineering, if you believe that. The Ancient Aliens show as presented by the History Channel has so many blunders and absurd assumptions that it's hard to take them seriously; however they have pointed out a few major unsolved mysteries that the mainstream academic world pretends don't exist, including how they moved massive megaliths thousands of years ago.

As I pointed out previously rational skeptics are justified claiming that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence; and experiments to replicate these efforts to move massive megaliths have failed miserably even though they often cheat; and they don't even try them with megaliths over forty tons.

Mainstream academics admit that the biggest megaliths moved by ancient civilizations are over seven-hundred tonnes, the Colossi of Memnon weighed seven-hundred-and-twenty tonnes and they were moved four-Hundred-and-twenty miles to a slightly higher altitude up the Nile River!

This isn't extraordinary enough evidence to prove all the absurd claims on Ancient Aliens; but it is extraordinary enough evidence to prove there's a major unsolved mystery and that we should be prepared to reevaluate many previous beliefs or claims from the scientific community that should make this impossible.

There are many more unsolved mysteries including UFO sightings, mystics, and alleged prophets; however few if any of them are quite so easy to recognize and major unsolved mysteries until sorting through the details, and the fringe conclusions many people come to are often as irrational as the poor excuses pseudo skeptics often use to dismiss them. One of these unsolved mysteries is why did they even let Donald Trump get elected in the first place. They've known how to do a better job providing propaganda to ensure that nutcases like him don't get the nomination; and there's good reason to believe that they also know how to run a better campaign for either Hillary Clinton or the pathetic bunch of clowns that ran in the Republic Party election after election.

They also know how to avoid pushing Israel, North Korea and many other countries to the brink of war without looking so clownish or avoid having an absurd war monger like John Bolton get into the administration.

Some of this might be unintended but they're creating an enormous amount of insanity when THEY DO KNOW BETTER, although those that don't pay close enough attention to all the insanity might not realize it!

Both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton were involved in way more than enough scandals that they should have been eliminated from consideration before the primary campaign even began. At one point on Howard Stern Donald Trump even laughed in front of Ivanka who also laughed when Howard Stern said something like he's not worried about sexual predators, he is one; and I'm reasonably sure that on another occasion also on Howard Stern that he admitted that he couldn't run for office because there would be too much baggage that would come out. There are plenty more stories about Hillary Clinton that were also public.

Yet the entire political establishment rallied behind Clinton and since the public was fed up with politics as usual, it's conceivable, especially for the people studying this that they could be rallied to a demagogue like Trump that pretends to be against the establishment, which is exactly what happened. This, alone, isn't enough to prove a connection to aliens; however it does open the possibility to different theories and if there is additional evidence from other sources ancient aliens might be one of the possibilities worth considering.

I've gone into this in a series of articles including the most recent one, Researching Poor, Slaves, Prisoners, To Benefit Ruling Class With Alien Technology? which includes additional links to past articles, including one about Steve Bannon who had previously worked for Biosphere Two before becoming a fanatical Climate Change denier, or just working for one and another one on the fundamentals of how known technology could potentially develop into the ability to travel to other solar system from a skeptics point of view with what I consider a rational use of Occam's Razor.

If it's possible for aliens to travel from one solar system to another than it could begin to explain many of these unsolved mysteries, including how technology is being developed so rapidly, assuming we had rational peer review, which we don't in the mainstream media right now. This is most likely to be accomplished, assuming it's possible at all, with long term space travel, using all the advanced scientist they have available to them, including artificial intelligence, nanotechnology, robotics, advanced propulsion, and more much of which is being developed rapidly now on Earth.

If this is what's been happening, then it could provide some hint about what their objective is and how they're trying to accomplish it. If it's not then there has to be some other explanation for many of the legitimate unsolved mysteries; and the evidence indicating that a small percentage of the public controls powerful institutions is still credible since it's not based on theory with inadequate evidence. Evidence to prove that is public record and can be found by anyone willing to look for it, assuming they don't rely solely on propaganda by mainstream media.

Some of my past speculation is about what aliens, assuming they exist and reached our planet thousands of years ago, might be trying to accomplish that they couldn't accomplish on their own planet or a planet without life. Leading possibilities might include researching a variety of things, perhaps including life on different planets and weather control of some sort. A lot of this sounds like science fiction, of course, however if climate change is caused by man, as most scientists now claim it is then it must be possible for some degree of control, which would almost certainly require a significant amount of research before it could be implemented.

Traditional scientists, including Michio Kaku, have admitted that they believe that it is possible to partially influence the weather and recommended some experiments with it; and the government has admitted to trying to do so with cloud seeding as far back as the Vietnam War. Lyndon Johnson gave a speech to congress in the sixties about climate change before the vast majority of the public was paying any attention to the subject and many people thought it was fringe. the response of some scientists, though was to search for far-fetched ways to experiment with weather control, which to the best of my knowledge has been unsuccessful.

Past speculation about this subject includes the fact that Steve Bannon has previously worked for Biosphere Two which was partially designed to study a controlled environment that could be used on another planet like Mars or to study the greenhouse effect and climate change. This means that he has to know more about this subject than he implies, and yet he became a climate change denier anyway without ever actually explaining why, except that he started working for a different billionaire who held different views. A conspiracy to study climate change, as far-fetched as it sounds, could partially explain this irrational and absurd behavior.

Additional speculation also includes research on prisoners potentially with help from alien technology several alleged whistle blowers claim the government has obtained from alien space crafty or from direct contact. All of these sources have major credibility problems, including Philip Corso, who might be among the most credible ones; however if it's even partially true then it must have a major impact on technological development. If there is something to this then there's a strong possibility that they're intentionally disclosing a lot of information through unreliable sources mixed in with lies so they can disclose things when and only when it suits their purposes.

If ancient aliens have been around for thousands of years and they influence the megalithic structures there's a strong possibility that they also influenced religion at it's early stages. some of the strongest evidence of this might be the alleged "Miracle of the Sun" at Fatima which Catholics although a review of the history of it might indicate that it's more likely to be a massive UFO sighting, which is far more likely than the sun entering the atmosphere, which many Catholics believe.

Some of the more widely recognized conspiracy theories about the alleged Illuminati, which supposedly means the "Illuminated Ones," often involve the Knights Templar who thought they were doing "God's work" according to most historical versions. They were apparently killed after a conflict with the pope, yet God was supposed to be on their side. There are many other stories about God allegedly making "covenants" with his people which often involve enabling them to win massive battles with God's help and blessings. In the Bible it says that God made a covenant with Abraham to allow his descendants to win battles conquering a massive empire; however when it suited God's purposes he allowed them to be sold into slavery and released in a dramatic fashion with alleged miracles to show how glorious God was; but when people displeased God for reasons they couldn't understand he allowed Babylon or the Romans to win. According to Exodus 14:4 and several other verses, before they were released from slavery in Egypt, instead of just telling Pharaoh to let his people go and making him compliment he "Hardened his heart" so that he would be disobedient and God used this obvious entrapment as an excuse to show how great hew as by terrorizing Egyptians to let his people go.

If God was as benevolent as religious people believe he is why wouldn't he maintain an open, honest line of communication and teach people to set up democratic institutions instead of arranging for them to fight one war after another where he's constantly switching sides so that he can chose the winner based on an undisclosed agenda? If God was as benevolent as religious people believe then he simply would do that unless either he doesn't exist at all, or they misunderstood him and he has an ulterior motive. The Ancient aliens theory could be the later.

Another thing that I began speculating about before the election was decided was whether or not the election was being rigged based on a far-fetched Biblical Apocalypse conspiracy theory which I admitted was hard to believe and should have been discredited; however, now that Donald Trump has been elected and there appears to be a growing chance that he'll get impeached for one reason or another instead of falling apart it may have gotten even stronger, even though it still seems insane. After Stormy Daniels interview on Sixty Minutes it may seem even more likely that he'll be impeached; however he's already gone through one scandal after another which should have ended his presidency or even prevented him from running in the first place yet this absurd charade keeps escalating.

This is exactly what the Democratic process is supposed to prevent and if we had a diverse media covering all issues and candidates fairly there's no way either Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump could have ever gotten the nomination.

No doubt a lot of people would consider the ancient alien conspiracy theory insane, especially the one on the History Channel, which as I suspect is intentionally including an enormous amount of blunders so people won't take it seriously; and of course it is!

However the official version of truth as presented by the media and political establishment is also insane!

The only question is which insane version of truth is real the media's, mine, or some other version?

No matter how you look at it something insane is going on!

Speculation about impeachment began even before the election when they decided who the nominees were for both parties, who both had incredibly high negative ratings, yet the political establishment kept pushing them anyway.

If ether is something to the Ancient Aliens theory then those that refuse to even look at the evidence won't be able to figure out the whole truth; however even if you don't believe that, as I said before, there's plenty of evidence of an oligarchy that only hires people from a small class of people as indicated in some of the articles about administration members moving back and forth through government and the corporate world including a list of the cabinets for various presidents below for starters.

If anyone is interested I provided a more comprehensive list of all the articles about Ancient Aliens in Researching Poor, Slaves, Prisoners, To Benefit Ruling Class With Alien Technology? which includes all the various subjects summarized in this article with more details; and even without an ancient aliens conspiracy theory there's an enormous amount of research about how to reduce violence including the school shootings or high violence rates in abandoned inner cities that the media ignores which I covered more in Prevention of violence has to address all causes, not just Guns! This also includes additional articles and sources from mainstream academics which aren't considered fringe like those speculating about UFOs, although the best researchers aren't covered by mainstream media.



Scientology's Abusive Release Forms

CONFIDENTIALITY/NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT concerning the case of Estate of Lisa McPherson, etc. v. Church of Scientology, et a/,

DISTRUST IN CLEARWATER -- A special report.; Death of a Scientologist Heightens Suspicions in a Florida Town 12/01/1997

Excerpt from "Going Clear: Scientology, Hollywood, and the Prison of Belief" by By Lawrence Wright about non-disclosure agreements

Tracy Morgan refuses to testify under oath in Walmart insurance dispute 06/05/2017

Inside Gov Barack Obama Cabinet Members

Wikipedia: Confirmations of Barack Obama's Cabinet

Wikipedia: Presidency of Barack Obama

Wikipedia: Cabinet of Donald Trump

Wikipedia: Presidency of George W. Bush

Wikipedia: Presidency of Bill Clinton

Trump-Linked Firm Cambridge Analytica Harvested 50M Facebook Users’ Data 03/19/2018

McDonald's just hired former White House press secretary Robert Gibbs 06/09/2015

Amazon just hired Obama’s former press secretary Jay Carney 02/26/2015

NBC News signs former White House press secretary Josh Earnest 03/27/2017

Do you want to cut carbon with that? McDonald’s sets climate target 03/20/2018

Maryanne Trump Barry

What Is the Deep State? Even if we assume the concept is valid, surely it’s not useful to think of the competing interests it represents as monolithic. By Greg Grandin 02/17/2017 Includes list of detailed books exposing extensive corruption disclosed from reliable sources but not widely reported in traditional media.

Wikipedia: Deep state in the United States

Democracy Now Tags Indicted Multi-Millionaire Crook as a Whistleblower and Goes after Russia! 10/18/2013 Serious questions have arisen about how Democracy Now!, begun and developed with the resources of Pacifica Radio and grants from the Carnegie Corporation, the Ford Foundation, the J.M. Kaplan Fund and others, suddenly became independent and the effective property of Amy Goodman without recompense to Pacifica. This transfer apparently included valuable assets such as trademarks, ownership of years of archived programs, affiliate station access, and more. In a contract that remains secret, Amy Goodman is also receiving $1 million per year for a five-year period that began in 2002, according to Pacifica Treasurer Jabari Zakiya, to continue doing what has become Pacifica's flagship morning news program. This is more than double Goodman's officially stated stipend of $440,000 per year from Pacifica Radio. Democracy Now! receives indirect funding from George Soros, and direct funding from the Ford Foundation, the Glaser Foundation, Soros' Open Society Institute…

Aliens CREATED GOD… and now they want him back - shock claim of how religion began 03/30/2017

America Remains Drunk on Power 03/22/2018 “Data mining is not a new phenomenon. In fact, before Cambridge Analytica, Barack Obama mined data during his 2012 presidential campaign, and he was hailed as a political pioneer.