The
literal meaning of Apocalypse is revelations and the literal meaning of
Armageddon is Megiddo; however these terms are more often associated
with the end of times. Even though the current belief is not the
original one this is the one I am referring to because many people
believe it anyway and they often base their decisions on this
interpretation.
In
many cases in the past there clearly have been examples on a smaller
scale where Armageddon prophecies have encouraged people to pursue a
course of action that often brings about their own destruction. Carl
Sagan once described a simplified example where there was a prophecy of
war following the passing of a comet. This was presented to the people
who came to believe it. Then eventually a comet did come to pass and a
leading member of society said this meant there would be war and they
started beating the war drums and preparing for war. The other side
heard of it or perhaps they also were familiar with the same prophecy
and they also prepared for war which eventually led to a war and the
appearance of a legitimate prophecy. This legitimacy begins to fall
apart as soon as you look a little closer and realize that the prophecy
helped encourage people to bring about the war and their own demise. A
simalar historical example is when Croesus was told that if he attacked
the Persians, he would destroy a great empire which he thought was good
if it was the enemy he destroyed but he wound up destroying his own
great empire.
There
are many more recent examples of small scale self fulfilling Apocalypse
prophecies including David Koresh, Marshall Applewhite, Jim Jones,
Charles Manson, Jeffrey Lundgren and many more. All of these cult
leaders pursued a course of action that helped bring about the
destruction of their own cults often the death as well either by suicide
or in a conflict of some sort. These were all partially encouraged by
myths about Apocalypse that often tell people they should trust their
leaders who will lead them into victory in a great battle. It is often
hard to tell which leader is the Christ or the good messiah and which
one is the anti-Christ or the false messiah. Either way people are
expected to trust their leader without scrutiny. The scrutiny that they
pass up on is what is needed to find out whether their leaders deserve
trust. If they allow the scrutiny and the public understands the basics
of any subject they don’t have to base their decisions on trust alone.
They can often confirm a lot of what they need to make rational
decisions. Trusting any leader without scrutiny is almost guaranteed to
backfire.
There
are also many more of these Apocalypse prophecies and the believers
that expect them to come true and may act to bring them about. Some of
the larger ones include more widely accepted organization like the
Christian Zionists and other fundamentalists. These people seem to
believe the way to bring about salvation is to bring about war in Israel
so that it will usher in the return of Jesus and the final great battle
that will be world wide. Intentional or not some activities have taken
place that did stir up unnecessary conflict in Israel. One of the most
blatant was when Arial Sharon went to the holy wall with guards in 1999
even though he knew it would anger the Palestinians whether it was to
prove that he is within his rights to got their or for some other reason
isn’t the important thing. In fact anyone should have had the right to
go there but that doesn’t mean it was the best way to defuse the
situation. What is important is that instead of trying to educate the
public and try to settle the difference in a peaceful way he incited an
uprising. The peace process came to a halt including the work that Seeds
of peace were trying to accomplish. Further more they went on to elect
the person who incited the riot to Prime Minister. It took years before
they could partially recover from this and they are still in a constant
state of turmoil because they continue to incite each other instead of
trying to put it behind them.
The
Apocalypse prophecies may also be making it easier to maintain the war
on terror based on flimsy evidence in many cases. There may be a lot of
people that are allowing their religion to influence their decisions
when they do their part to support efforts to save the world by nonstop
battle and secrecy. This may not be as clear cut but the implication is
still there and even if it isn’t then it doesn’t change the fact that
the best way to bring about peace in the long term is to learn how to
get along and educate everyone who is capable of learning.
The
Mass Media is doing a lot to increase the belief in these prophecies by
focusing so much attention on it in what they consider an unbiased
manner. The most effective way to be unbiased is to present all points
of view including the views of the most educated people who do a good
job researching any given subject and showing the work so the public
understands and can come to rational conclusions. They have been putting
a lot of attention on the Apocalypse lately but they haven’t been doing
as much as I think they could have to debunk it rationally. They have
also been putting a lot of attention on the Mayan 2012 doomsday scenario
as well this could encourage more panic responses by some people who
are less capable of sorting out the details and avoiding Apocalypse
instead of bringing it about. This just seems to another end of days
date of which we have already had dozens if not hundreds and they have
often been accompanied with small scale cults that self destructed and
often brought others with them. The only difference is that this one is
being encouraged by the Mass Media on a larger scale and it is
accompanied by many potential dangers which are legitimate like
environmental damage, famine, war and other legitimate problems which
should be dealt with in a rational manner by finding out the cause of
each individual danger and preventing it. It does no good to create a
panic that could raise emotions and make people more likely to follow
the leader into war.
Instead
of try to lead people into a great battle they should have been trying
to find out how to avoid any battle at all if possible if not how to
minimize the damage and build a society that will know how to get along
better afterwards. This isn’t what Apocalypse prophecies generally do.
The way to accomplish this is to study the battles in the past and more
important the things that led up to these battles so that we can figure
out what the causes of them are and how to prevent them. This hasn’t
been done in the past based on prophecy so if people want to avoid wars
and the destruction of the planet or lesser conflict they need to try
something different.
Wars
are not the only things predicted in many of these prophecies and some
of the other things in some of these prophecies often seem to be coming
true as well. If this is the case then it is important to organize the
different threats whether or not they are part of a prophecy or not.
Then regardless of what the threat is the best thing to do is to figure
out what the cause of is and prevent it.
One
example that has often been portrayed as a potential cause of
Apocalypse is a potential asteroid impact. The people in the past
couldn’t have known to predict this since they didn’t even know that
asteroids existed but it has recently been reinterpreted as a possible
cause of Apocalypse. This has been played up a lot in recent years yet
it isn’t a new threat. The only thing that is relatively new is the
ability of the public to understand it. There haven’t been any major
impacts that could threaten civilization in thousands if not millions of
years. There is no reason to panic about this in fact NASA has clearly
outlined a two step effort to avoid it generally speaking. The first
step is to set up a system to track asteroids and find them long before
they hit the Earth. The second step involves experimenting with new
technology to find out how to safely divert them. A third step should be
added to educate the public better. NASA is financed by tax dollars
they should do more to let the public know what is going on since they
are working for the public. This doesn’t have to be expensive. They
already have a massive amount of data available to their own scientist.
They just need to make this available to the public in a way the people
can understand it starting with the basics. In the past when I checked
NASA’s web site it hasn’t been as organized as it could or should be and
they have often changed it sometimes for the worse. They should set it
up in the most organized way possible and keep it that way without fancy
graphics to amaze the public. The most important thing should be to
educate the public.
Other
potential dangers should also be handled in the most rational manner
possible whether any one believes it is associated with Apocalypse or
not. The most important one may be the damage being done to the
environment and the governmental and Mass Media control structure that
is preventing this from being dealt with in a more rational manner.
This was first posted on Tripod on December 22 2009; it will be followed up by an updated post about an “Environmental Apocalypse” and a new post about the coming collapse of the insurance industry and the activities surrounding the “fiscal cliff” and other irrational behavior by the government and corporate America. For additional information about my older blogs see my index of past blogs from previous sites
No comments:
Post a Comment