Epidemic 2020 Election Fraud Again

Massive epidemic levels of election fraud and suppression is now routine; however, mainstream media often ignores the vast majority of it, and when they do report on some of it they only cover a small aspect of it and often spin it as if it';s a minor issue or try to deny it. I went into an enormous amount of election fraud stories in 2016 explaining how they rigged the primaries in Can Hillary Clinton win without cheating?

(This is an ongoing systematic problem with evidence of additional voter suppression or other methods of rigging the primaries being exposed at the grassroots level; therefore it's virtually guaranteed that there will be more evidence, which I'll update on this page periodically through the election, especially if they successfully rig the nomination for Biden. Edit 04/04/2020: additional articles were added listed at the bottom including a follow up from Mark Crispin Miller, which was also added to his excerpted article.)

They're doing it again, with an enormous amount of evidence scattered in various low profile locations. Some of the most important part of their fraud isn't actually rigging the actual votes, although there's an enormous amount of that, it's rigging the media coverage so that only candidates that the media support can get any coverage enabling them to get the name recognition they need to be to become viable. But occasionally a good candidate manages to overcome this and make it virtually impossible for the media, controlled by a fraction of 1% of the richest members of the public, to ignore him without losing the last shred of credibility that some people still think they have.



For all practical purposes the establishment virtually admits they're trying to manipulate the system to elect candidates that support their agenda and stop progressives like Bernie Sanders from getting elected often arguing for blatant double standards which they feel justified in using, yet consider it outrageous when others try to do the same thing; one example is Amee Vanderpool who tweeted the following just before Super Tuesday It was important for Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar to suspend when they did to slow the Bernie progression and Bloomberg needs to quit his run before tomorrow as well. Incidentally, this is the exact same reason that Elizabeth Warren should NOT drop out of the race. 03/02/2020

Amee Vanderpool supposedly supported Elizabeth Warren because she's been portrayed as a progressive, like Bernie Sanders; so you would think she wouldn't be so adamantly opposed to Sanders, as she and most other establishment pundits are; however, as I pointed out in Can Hillary Clinton win without cheating? she's not nearly as progressive as she seems, and Bernie Sanders has a long record of sticking by his principles. Vanderpool never really supported those progressive views, which Elizabeth Warren often caved on, instead wanting her to stay in because they were giving her an enormous amount of positive propaganda making her look progressive so she could draw votes away from Sanders, even though it was clear before Super Tuesday that she had no chance of winning.

This is just a small sample of the spin the media is constantly putting out all day every day on Cable and other sources, including social media. But this kind of deceptive spin isn't fooling everyone, and I've compiled an enormous amount of evidence below from many articles, one good description of how cutting polling access to low income areas is at an epidemic level being done by both political parties and how the media spins it is provided by Julie Hollar in:

Elite Media Dismiss Voter Suppression on Grounds That It’s ‘Complicated’ 03/13/2020

It’s charitable that the affluent aren’t complaining about standing in line for hours (as no one should face obstacles to vote)—but they’re also typically not worried about getting fired or missing a paycheck for doing so.

Some voters—disproportionately black and brown ones—waited in line for several hours on Super Tuesday to cast their ballots in the Democratic primary, and media paid attention. But their love for a good visual doesn’t always correspond with a love for connecting the dots, and so most of the coverage downplayed any suggestion that there might be voter suppression going on in 2020.

“Why Did It Take So Long to Vote in Texas and California?” asked a New York Times headline (3/4/20), which offered a reassuring answer in its subhead: “Some voters stood in lines for hours. But despite voter suppression concerns, the primary breakdowns apparently reflected snafus more than malign intent.” Reporter Michael Wines explained:

Some critics complained on Twitter and elsewhere that the delays amounted to voter suppression in a state where Republicans have been frequently sued, sometimes successfully, for trying to minimize Democratic power. But Texas elections are tightly controlled by local officials, not state ones. And in big cities like Houston and Austin which had the biggest problems on Tuesday, those officials are Democrats with scant reason to depress turnout in Democratic urban strongholds.

And yet, in the very next paragraph, Wines reported that “voting machines were divided equally between Democratic and Republican voters—but many more Democrats turned out to vote on Tuesday,” later explaining that

the imbalance stemmed from the county Republican Party’s refusal to agree with Democrats to hold a joint primary election in metropolitan Houston in which voters could cast ballots on any machine. All but a handful of the state’s 254 counties held joint primaries.

The article’s final paragraph noted that the Houston voting site at historically black Texas Southern University, where people waited up to seven hours to vote,

allotted 10 voting machines to each party, and eventually added 14 additional machines for Democratic voters, she said. But of those who showed up on Tuesday, 1,132 voted in the Democratic primary. Sixty-eight voted for Republican candidates.

It’s a curiously stark mismatch between evidence and conclusions, a phenomenon repeated in the Washington Post (3/4/20), where reporter Elise Viebeck likewise took issue with those suggesting voter suppression was happening: Complete article

To put it simply making lower income people stay in long lines all across the country with some of the worst lines in Texas, Michigan, and even California, when Bernie won anyway, ensures that candidates favoring the wealthy are much more likely to get elected, which means Biden of Trump! But even that isn't enough cheating for the establishment; one of the most compelling sources of cheating at the polls as well is TDMS | Research which did in depth studies showing that establishment candidates routinely out performed their exit poll predictions, while Bernie Sanders under performed in all races that were studied, with Biden benefiting in almost all of them, except for New Hampshire, where Buttigieg benefited as described in the following articles:

Is the DNC cheating? Again? 03/13/2020 By Michael T. Hertz

The DNC’s candidate always gains in the counting. And that is highly suspicious.

TDMS Research has been doing a lot of comparison in several primary states between exit polls and final reported results. For example, in connection with the Texas primary, TDMS wrote:

"The 2020 Texas Democratic Party presidential primary was held on March 3, 2020. Election results from the computerized vote counts differed significantly from the results projected by the exit poll conducted by Edison Research and published by CNN at poll’s closing. According to the exit poll Sanders was tied with Biden but lost in the unobservable computer counts by 4.5%."

"In this election, candidate Sanders saw the largest discrepancy between the exit poll and computer vote counts. His projected vote proportion fell 4% in the vote counts—a 12% reduction of his exit poll share. The combined discrepancies between the exit poll and the vote count for candidates Sanders and Biden at 4.4% significantly exceeded the 2.9% margin of error for the exit poll difference between the two. The discrepancies between Sanders and Bloomberg at 5.4% was triple their respective margin of error. See table below."

"There is good reason to believe that the exit poll just prior to publishing showed a Sanders win in Texas."

In the five primaries researched – Texas (-4.0%), Vermont (-6.3%), New Hampshire (-0.3%), South Carolina (-1.4%) and Massachusetts (-3.8%)– Sanders’ computer vote counts were always significantly below the exit polls. Biden’s counts, on the other hand, always went up above the exit polls, except in New Hampshire. The only candidate who went up in New Hampshire was Buttigieg.

Hopefully, the researchers will compute the results for other states, like California, Colorado, and Michigan. But the present results are disturbing in and of themselves. Why should Sanders always go down while Biden almost always go up? The results seriously affect the delegate count.

One might also point out that in the Super Tuesday vote, there were 14 states. All of the results in which Biden won were fully reported within days of the election. But in the three in which Sanders won – California, Utah, and Colorado – the final results were still unreported over a week later. This made it appear that Sanders was further behind than actually true by the time Super Tuesday II rolled around. That probably encouraged voters to choose Biden as the leading candidate.

TDMS Research did similar research in 2016. The result was that Clinton generally went up and Sanders down. We’re just having a repeat of 2016. The criticisms of these results don’t hold water. Even if there are mistakes, why do all the mistakes favor the persons who oppose Sanders? Complete article

Mark Crispin Miller, who'e been studying election fraud for years, if not decades and wrote "Loser Take All" made a similar observation based on a New Hampshire poll a few days before the election In Massachusetts, 2/28 poll showed Bernie LEADING with 25%, Warren in 2nd place with 17%—and Biden FIFTH, with 9%. Yet Biden won? 03/12/2020 WBUR Poll: Sanders Opens Substantial Lead In Mass., Challenging Warren On Her Home Turf 02/28/2020 I haven't seen a thorough study of all the polls available to see whether or not Bidfen outperformed while Bernie under performed the pre-election polls; however, I did look up a few below, and the ones I saw, listed below, indicates that in most cases that's exactly what happened, increasing the possibility of election fraud of some sort, which probably includes both voter suppression with epidemic long lines in areas more likely to vote for Bernie Sanders, and discrepancies at the actual polls, since it includes both exit polls and pre-election polls showing the same thing.

California, Texas, N. Carolina, Virginia 03/03/2020 Biden over performed in all four of these polls, with three of them by 6% to 11%; while Bernie Sanders was close on all four slightly under performing on two and slightly over performing on the other two.

Super Tuesday RCP Averages Wayback Machine retrieved 02/26/2020 Biden over-performed by over 14%; while Bernie Sanders only over-performed by just under 7% in California; Biden over-performed by 13.8% in Texas Bernie only over-performed by 7.7; Biden over-performed by 23.4% in North Carolina while Bernie Sanders only over-performed by 3.1%; Biden got five times his poll results in Minnisota, presumably because all the support for Amy Klobuchar went to him, before that he was expected to get a third of what Bernie got; in Oklahoma Biden increased his lead from 3% to 13% in final results while Bloomberg decreased by over 6%; in Virginia Biden did more than twice what the polls expected while Bernie Sanders did worse than polls anticipated, which predicted a comfortable win for him there; this poll also confirms Mark Crispin Millers doubts about Massachusetts, with him coming in fourth but getting well over double what was expected; Colorado also shows Biden outperforming his polls but not by as much as most other states, and Bernie still won this; Maine polls predicted a comfortable win for Bernie with Biden coming in fourth, showing that his victory was as much of a surprise than Massachusetts; Bernie did as expected in his own state but Biden did much better; Biden got more than twice what was expected getting a massive win in Arkansas instead of an anticipated modest victory; Both Bernie and Biden outperformed in Utah, and this was one of the few where the lead that Bernie got was predicted relatively close, while all others seemed to favor Biden despite the fact that he can't draw crowds and has little grassroots support.

Mainstream media acknowledges some of these problems, but gives them minimal coverage and tries to spin it to make it appear as if it's the way Democracy is supposed to work with what they portray as minor glitches; however alternative media is full of much more credible sources including Common Dreams, Lee Camp, Ben Norton and others who make much more credible arguments and show their work so you don't have to take their word for it, you can check the facts for yourself!

Mainstream media and the political establishment are counting on the public keeping their head in the sand and ignoring it, but those that do this will be waken up during massive protests which are expected to happen during the convention!



The following polls also have similar results, almost always having Bernie doing worse and Biden doing much better than expected and, even though his support isn't nearly as strong as Bernie's as clearly indicated by enormous crowds, enthusiasm and vocal support from social media. His positions on the issues also have much more support than Biden's, yet we're supposed to believe that everyone's voting for the candidate opposing them on issues.

Super Tuesday RCP Averages Wayback Machine retrieved 03/03/2020

Bernie Sanders holds 2-1 lead in California, poll shows 02/28/2020 Sen. Bernie Sanders has taken a commanding lead in California’s Democratic presidential race, ahead of his nearest rival by 2 to 1 and on track to win a majority of the huge trove of delegates at stake in the state’s March 3 primary, according to the final UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies poll of the contest. (Final results were 34% for Bernie to 27.2% for Biden with 98% reporting, most of the votes took days, some over a week, to count making Biden's delegate lead seem larger when the next primary was held.) Biden

Our Final Forecast For Super Tuesday Shows Biden’s Surge — And Lots Of Uncertainty 03/03/2020

Who’s ahead in Arizona? 03/17/2020

Who’s ahead in Illinois? 03/17/2020

Florida 03/17/2020

Ohio 03/17/2020

XX 03/1/2020 https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2020-primary-forecast/missouri/

Washington forecast and results 03/1/2020

Ben Norton: The US gov's own soft-power arm USAID, which meddles in elections across the globe, says in its election guide:
"A discrepancy between the aggregated choices reported by voters [exit polls] and the official results may suggest, but not prove, that results have been tampered with" 03/05/2020



Mark Crispin Miller even raises doubts about Bernie Sanders remaining silent about election theft, which many of his supporters were angry about in 23016 as well, including me. There's no doubt that he's far better than the establishment candidates, and is consistently right on the issues, but when he remains silent and even tries to patch together the record of Hillary Clinton, Tom Perez and the DNC despite the fact that they're cheating his agenda and rigging the polls, it even raises some doubts about him even though we don't want to doubt him.

One thing we clearly need to learn is that even if we can elect a good candidate like Bernie he's going to need an enormous amount of help from the grassroots and there may still be times where we'll have to keep him honest. In the long run we ahve to start supporting the candidates that the mainstream media refuse to cover at all, their consolidated control of over 95% or national speech is the biggest obsticle, but Miller raises legitimate concerns when he wrote the following:

In the bad tradition of John Kerry and Al Gore, Bernie Sanders dummies up about election theft 03/12/2020

Why is Bernie still refusing to say anything at all re: his unlikeliest “defeats” in this election cycle—in Iowa, Massachusetts and elsewhere? If he thinks doing so would make him “a sore loser,” he hasn’t read today’s NYTimes, which has already gleefully (and illiterately) depicted him as “an aggrieved outsider” for blaming various other “factors”—everything except election theft—for his improbable “decline” against the ludicrous Joe Biden. (See below.) So if his muteness on the all-important subject of our rotten voting system is his effort not to seem unsportingly “aggrieved,” he should ungag himself ASAP, because that effort is a failure—and American democracy will be absolutely fucked beyond salvation if he doesn’t do the right thing and speak up at last, as Jill Stein (very bravely) did last time.

Let me be still more blunt about the man whom I’ve supported all along (with some misgivings): Bernie’s failure to say anything about that crucial subject is especially contemptible because one “factor” that he has now “cited” is the failure of “young voters” to turn out for him. “Let me tell you the bad news, to be honest with you: young people vote at much lower rates than older people,” he told a young crowd in St. Louis Monday morning. “All right? That is the facts [sic]. I hope all of the old people vote, that’s great, but I want young people to vote at the same rates.”So how does Bernie know that those young people have stayed home? How does he know that many of them didn’t try to vote, didn’t have their votes erased, flipped, or fractionalized? Does his campaign know nothing of the tricks and tactics that were used to steal the Democratic nomination four years ago, and that are evidently being used again? If they and he don’t know, they’re either ignorant, orin denial—or playing their part in the pro wrestling spectacle that is “American democracy” today.

We know that they’re not ignorant, because a lot of activists have clued them in, with rising desperation; and it’s unlikely that the man and his campaign are in denial vis-a-vis election theft, since Bernie is a seasoned politician, and election theft is plenty older than himself. This leaves the chilling possibility that Bernie—like John Kerry in ’04—is only playing the role of challenger, and will step back once Biden stumbles to the fore, or (take a sip of dramamine) when Hillary rides her broomstick to the rescue; and when Joe and/or Hillary, or maybe Liz, steps in to save”the center” from the rest of us, he—Bernie—will surrender to “reality,” and help the Democrats deliver the United States from Orange Julius.

Of course, it’s possible that Bernie won’t cave in like that, but would respond by doing something arguably cool like making a third-party bid, with Tulsi at his side. That would be cool—if the USA had a legitimate voting system (like in Venezuela). Since We the People don’t have such a system, no third party can do anything but help”elect” whichever of the “choices” on the menu the election gremlins, and their masters, have decided on, and then that theft, however flagrant, will be handily “explained” as the result of that third party having hurt the “losing” candidate (as Nader has been wrathfully—and wrongly—blamed for Al Gore’s losing Florida back in 2000).

And so—again—we need to reaffirm our right to vote, and to have our votes all counted fairly and transparently, before we can get anywhere but here.

Mark Crispin Miller Original article

Edit 04/04/2020: On the same day that I originally posted this article Mark Crispin Miller posted an update saying that one of his subscibers had contacted him saying that he had ties to the Sanders campaign, including Levi Sanders Bernie's son and passed on a link to his article; Mark Adams, the subscriber received an E-mail indicating that Bernie would address the issue during the first, and possibly only one on one debate with Biden but when the debate happened he said nothing, to read Miller and Adams responses see What to do about the theft of Bernie’s victories (since Bernie won’t do anything)? 03/23/2020

There are also more stories about additional election rigging than many people can keep track of including many other more important ones with as much credibility as the ones previously cited. I compiled a long list of them below, which is more than I can go into in detail. In all fairness, some of them might not be quite as credible as others, but feel free to check them out to come to your own conclusions. One of the issues that's being ignored by mainstream media is thousands of alleged Trump supporters that are voting for Biden to stop Bernie, some thinking that he'll be easier to beat, others more concerned about misleading anti communism propaganda, which doesn't stand up to scrutiny.



There are also some stories about some Trump supporters voting for Bernie to keep the primaries going, but the final results don't seem to indicate that's happening, unless the votes are being flipped.



Rigging elections has been routine for decades if not centuries, but the history of this is only reported in good non-fiction books that get no promotional help from mainstream media or the political establishment, presumably because they recognize these books expose their own fraud! Check out the following well researched books (click on images for excepts) reporting what the media is ignoring, including both historical fraud and a growing trend in past couple decades:

Andrew Gumbel first published this book as "Steal This Vote" for more excerpts of that click here.

The following are a long list of articles about voter suppression or fraud; I'll be following this up with more in another Blog Post that will include any additional reports; but there's already enough to show it's an epidemic problem:

PROVEN: Biden Won the Democratic Nomination by Cheating. 03/14/2020

TDMS | Research

‘Rigged’ rhetoric makes a comeback after Trump’s comments and Sanders’s losses — and gives Russia just what it wants 03/04/2020 This spin is mind boggling they're far more concerned about the appearance of rigging the election, than they are about rigging it! Russia isn't creating the long lines in lower income or minority areas, and only the most gullible will believe mainstream media spin like this!

Was the Democratic primary rigged? 11/14/2017 Even for the Democratic Party, the past few weeks have been bizarre. First, Donna Brazile, the former chair of the Democratic National Committee, published excerpts of a forthcoming book in which she says that after she took over the Democratic National Committee, she investigated “whether Hillary Clinton’s team had rigged the nomination process” through the DNC, and discovered evidence that they did. “I had found my proof and it broke my heart,” she wrote. In the aftermath of Brazile’s bombshell, Sen. Elizabeth Warren was asked if she “agree[d] with the notion that it was rigged?” “Yes,” she replied.

The Grayzone and CODEPINK demand emergency OAS election observers in 2020 Democratic presidential primary 03/09/2020

Dear Democratic party: it's time to stop rigging the primaries 06/11/2018

Bernie Sanders Campaign IMMEDIATELY Address Systemic Democratic Primary Election Fraud 03/23/2016

Florida Woman Changed Voters’ Party Affiliations, Officials Say 03/07/2020

The Iowa caucus debacle shows why tech and voting don’t mix 02/05/2020

New Residency Law In N.H. Sparks Charges Of Voter Suppression And A Lawsuit 11/08/2019

New Hampshire primary showed how student turnout can overcome voter suppression 02/14/2020

Nevada early voting rules spark claims of voter suppression 02/20/2020

All the Ways Your Vote May Not Be Counted in South Carolina 02/29/2020 Conveniently cites a voter that supports Biden who couldn't vote, rather than provide comprehensive comparison for perspective.

California Trashes Thousands of Mail-In Ballots, ACLU Says 11/15/2017







Operation Chaos 2020

U.S. Citizens Officially Request Emergency Electoral Assistance From The United Nations 2016

Long lines, voting problems prompt an investigation, grilling of L.A.'s elections chief 03/11/2020 The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors has ordered an investigation into complaints about long waits and equipment malfunctions that hampered voting at many poll centers during last week’s primary election. At a hearing on Tuesday, the supervisors ordered the county’s chief elections official, Dean Logan, to explain what they called “serious problems” for voters — and to address them before the general election in November. They didn’t mince words in telling Logan that they were dissatisfied and concerned with the performance of a new $300-million electronic voting system that his office unveiled for the primary.

Caucus app blamed for Iowa vote count chaos was created by tech firm Shadow, Inc. that is run by staff from Hillary Clinton and Obama's campaigns 02/03/2020

New Details Show How Deeply Iowa Caucus App Developer Was Embedded in Democratic Establishment 02/04/2020

Another New Voting System Causes Problems at the Polls 03/04/2020

After 6 hours, Houston man finally gets to vote at 1:30 a.m. 03/4/2020









THREAD We know that the Establishment is doing everything they can to stop Bernie Sanders. But this apparently includes actual election fraud. That is a bold allegation, but it is based in facts as reported on election night by TDMS Research. 1/8 03/05/2020 In the 2020 Massachusetts primary election results differed significantly from the results projected by the exit poll. As in the 2016 Massachusetts primary between candidates Sanders and Clinton, disparities greatly exceed the exit poll’s margin of error.

South Carolina 2020 Democratic Party Primary Exit Poll Versus Reported Vote Count 03/02/2020

New Hampshire 2020 Democratic Party Primary Exit Poll Versus Reported Vote Count 02/17/2020

The computerized vote counts from the South Carolina Democratic primary also differed significantly from the exit poll, yet again greatly exceeding its margin of error 03/05/2020

Was Maine’s Democratic Party Behind a Statewide Effort to Prevent Sanders Voters from Getting Ballots? 03/05/2020

U.N. is needed to oversee Democratic primaries due to election fraud 03/10/2020

Lee Camp Redacted: [11] Exit Poll Expert Proves Election Fraud w/ Richard Charnin 03/05/2020

Super Tuesday Biden Victories Questioned by Election Watchers 03/10/2020

In a Dark Time, the Eye Begins to See’: The Bernie 2020 Campaign Represents a Fight That Must Continue 03/11/2020

The Coming Freak-out Over the California Primary 02/27/2020

Bernie Sanders Calls Long Lines at Michigan Polling Places an “Outrage” 03/11/2020

Greg Palast tag/vote-suppression

Brian Ross Honors Palast for Reports on Georgia Purge 02/21/2020

Super Tuesday Results Demonstrate That Caucuses Suppress the Vote 03/05/2020

Analysis: Messing with elections messes with democracy 03/07/2020 Rick Hasen has written a book — “Election Meltdown: Dirty Tricks, Distrust and the Threat to American Democracy” — that went public Tuesday.

Civil rights group demands Texas Secretary of State address Super Tuesday voting issues 03/05/2020 AUSTIN — A Texas civil rights group called the secretary of state, Texas’ top election official, to work with local officials to resolve the voting issues Texans faced on Super Tuesday before the November general election. Attorneys from the Texas Civil Rights Project sent a letter to Texas Secretary of State Ruth R. Hughs on Thursday demanding the state to work to eliminate long lines caused by shortages of elections workers and problems with machines. Issues were reported in Bexar, Dallas, Harris, Hays, Tarrant and Travis counties. “We demand that you and other relevant stakeholders take immediate action to invest in voting infrastructure and prevent a similar disaster from unfolding in November,” Mimi Marziani, president of the Texas Civil Rights Project, wrote in letter. The letter states the issues disproportionately affected many first-time voters and voters from marginalized communities. “What should have been a fast and straightforward process turned into a nightmare for hundreds of thousands of people across Texas,” Marziani wrote. “Instead — and as Texas has seen over and over — the brunt of the burden was borne by communities of color, young people and people with disabilities.” The letter specifically asks Hughs to host a series of town halls with voters in those counties by the end of April to hear the issues they encountered voting this week and share preparation for the November general election, the letter says. Hughs should also create a commission with community leaders, political party members and voting rights experts to further investigate the issues, the letter says. The secretary of state’s office did not immediately respond to the letter.

'Tidal wave of voter suppression' washes over states, lawyer says 03/03/2020

The risk of continued voter suppression in the 2020 Elections 03/10/2020

Voter suppression alive and well on Super Tuesday 2020 03/08/2020 In Georgia, they purged tens of thousands of voters, disproportionately people of color, from the rolls for offenses as trivial as a misplaced hyphen in a name. In North Carolina, they enacted a photo ID law designed with what a federal court called “almost surgical precision” to suppress the black vote. And in Texas, according to a report from the Leadership Conference Education Fund, they’ve closed 750 polling places since 2013 — more than any other state — so that now voters like Rogers must pass an endurance test simply to exercise a constitutional right.

Long voting lines put voter suppression front and center 03/04/2020

👇🏼Voter purging in Missouri. Do we have any legal groups that people can get help from to be able to vote? Pls post possible links or phone numbers on this thread: #VoterSuppression #NotMeUs 03/10/2020

If you had wait in line for more than an hour to vote yesterday, let me know what happened in the comments-include where you were, how long it took and other issues you saw. #VoterSuppression 03/04/2020

My county in Michigan has a population of 158K and we have 38 polling locations. Fargo has a population of 122K with only 1 location? I'd like to speak to a manager. 😤 #VoterSuppression #NDPrimary 03/10/2020

The Mayor of Kansas City went to vote at the site that he has been going to for the last 11 years and he wasn't on the rolls. This is Exhibit A when it comes to #VoterSuppression in America today. It's outrageous and should never be tolerated. 03/10/2020

The New Poll Tax? Long Lines, Closed Polling Stations Hurt Black, Latinx & Student Voters in TX, CA 03/05/2020

One of the six polling places I visited on Tuesday in solid Bernie districts. They were all like this. Lines wrapping around buildings and coiling around the voting area inside. Each site had over half its machines broken. Countless voters turned away. #VoterSuppression 03/05/2020

Voting should not require heroism, great sacrifice or strife. It should be made as easy and accessible to anyone who wishes to cast a ballot. Anybody who tells you otherwise is... well, a Republican and advocating for #VoterSuppression. 03/04/2020 “It is an outrage that it is this hard to cast a vote. … It is because the state government wants it to be hard to vote. It’s wrong. It should not take that much heroism and that much sacrifice to do your civic duty.” @maddow re: #VoterSuppression in TX

Black and Latino voters were hit hardest by long lines in the Texas Democratic primary 03/04/2020

Bernie Sanders Calls Long Lines at Michigan Polling Stations an 'Outrage,' Suggests Dems Are Engaging In Voter Suppression 03/10/2020

Lee Camp [Redacted]: The exit polls were off from the unaccountable voting machine results in Texas, South Carolina, California & Massachusetts. The difference always benefits Biden & hurts Bernie Sanders. More details here - 03/11/2020

Bernie lost 553,000 Votes to California Dem Party Rules 03/09/2020

Super Tuesday Biden Victories Questioned by Election Watchers 03/10/2020

A Michigan State University student after waiting over an hour in line to vote, called it quits and walked out. He said “this is bullshit, I can’t wait this long, I have to get to work.” @MichSoS, this is unacceptable. #MichiganPrimary #YouthVote2020 03/10/2020

Polls are officially closed in Michigan, but the East Lansing city clerks office is still packed with students who have been waiting on average 3 hours to vote. This is what the line currently looks like. Btw most of these people are voting for @BernieSanders . #MichiganPrimary 03/10/2020

How Biden Helped Strip Bankruptcy Protection From Millions Just Before a Recession 10/23/2019

Jen Rice original reporting: Carla Reed and Hervis Rogers, the last two voters at Texas Southern University. Finally got their "I voted" stickers. They waited six hours, until just after 1am. #TXDecides 03/04/2020

It took 7 hours for Hervis Rogers to vote at his polling place on the HBCU campus of Texas Southern University in Houston. Texas has closed 750 polling places since 2012, many in black and brown communities, causing long lines and waits. 03/04/2020

Dr. Manhattan: a lot of organizers in North Carolina are telling me that most people planning to vote for Biden thought he supported Medicare-For-All, oof. 03/04/2020

The 20-year argument between Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren over bankruptcy, explained 09/12/2019

Black and Latino voters were hit hardest by long lines in the Texas Democratic primary 03/03/2020

Elite Media Dismiss Voter Suppression on Grounds That It’s ‘Complicated’ 03/12/2020

Does the Bernie Bro actually exist? Harvard scientist analyzes 6.8 million tweets and finds Sanders supporters are NOT more hostile to rivals than people who support other candidates 03/10/2020

There Is Hard Data That Shows ‘Bernie Bros’ Are a Myth 03/10/2020

Salty Sanders Supporters Say They Won't Settle For Biden 03/11/2020

I Asked Biden About Obama-Era Deportations. He Told Me to Vote for Trump. 11/28/2019

Biden gets physical with voter in tense Iowa exchange over pipelines 01/28/2020 Former vice president tells climate activist to 'vote for someone else'

---

Edit 04/04/2020: the following articles were added after this was published:

What to do about the theft of Bernie’s victories (since Bernie won’t do anything)? 03/23/2020

Obvious Cheating On Coin Toss In Iowa Caucus 02/06/2020

Exit Polls: Bernie Sanders Was Robbed Again 03/28/2020

‘A complete disaster’: Fears grow over potential Nevada caucus malfunction 02/16/2020

BREAKING: Volunteers WARN Nevada Caucus Voting App WILL NOT WORK & Be 'A Complete Disaster'! 02/17/2020

Chicago Election Official Admits “Numbers Didn’t Match”: Hillary Clinton vs. Bernie Sanders Election Fraud Allegations 05/13/2016

New York Election Fraud: Is Arizona Happening Again? 04/19/2016

Surprise surprise - Bernie performed better in hand counted precincts! (adding confirmation to exit poll analysis) 03/29/2020

Cuomo announces NY primary will move to June 23rd 03/29/2020 The Democratic National Committee had warned states that postponing their primaries later than June 9th could result in penalties, including a possible reduction of delegates.

How Southern States Oppress Black Voters 02/18/2020

Lee Camp Redacted video 03/28/2020

Joe Biden won in every precinct that didn't have a paper trail in Texas. Including machines made by a company that used to be called Diebold who changed their name because they were caught up in voter fraud in 2004. 04/04/2020

Have American Elections Really Been Stolen? Part 1 in the "Democracy" in America Series – The Proof 10/29/2008 By Mark Adams

Would Congressional Democrats Cover Up Election Fraud? Part 2 in the "Democracy" in America Series – No Way, Right?!?! 11/03/2008 By Mark Adams

Why is injustice rampant in our democracy? 04/0/2020 By Mark Adams