Recently Richard Dolan, who I said on several occasions was one of the most credible researchers on UFOs, which has few good researchers, wrote a book "The Alien Agendas: A Speculative Analysis of Those Visiting Earth," which is overdue, assuming aliens really are visiting Earth. Despite the claims of many skeptics there may be a significant amount of evidence showing this may be true; either that or there's a massive effort to make it seem as if this is true, and many other major related unsolved mysteries that would remain unsolved if this isn't the case.
Unfortunately he ignores some of the strongest evidence showing what an alien agenda might be and focuses on some weaker evidence, a lot of which is from alien abduction stories which don't always come from the most credible sources, and some ancient biological evidence that is difficult for most people to understand. This isn't uncommon for many of the highest profile UFO researchers or skeptics, who almost always seem to have major credibility problems and do a terrible job presenting their case. As I've said before in previous articles, I suspect this may not be entirely accidental, and they might not be trying to present a credible case.
Many rational skeptics claim that "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence," and this certainly is preferable when it's available; and in some cases, it is; but skeptics refuse to acknowledge that evidence. This doesn't mean that there's any simple straight-forward evidence proving all the claims of many UFO believers; however, there is often enough extraordinary evidence proving that there's a major unsolved mystery and that we should consider different possibilities until we figure out the real explanation, which is the scientific way even of so called rational skeptics refuse to acknowledge many major unsolved mysteries.
Some of these major unsolved mysteries, which I've gone into more details in past articles, include an enormous number of UFO sightings, often by large numbers of people and/or many people with high credibility, massive ancient megaliths that shouldn't have been possible to more with ancient technology, crop circles, cattle mutilations, mystics, and numerous other unsolved mysteries that many skeptics can't explain away without resorting to ridicule or some other manipulation tactic. When it comes to one major unsolved mystery after another, it can usually be narrowed down to two possibilities, generally speaking, either there's something to the unsolved mystery, which could include visitation by aliens, even if many of the details of leading theories are flawed; or, if there's massive amounts of alleged evidence by many well organized people, there's a massive effort to make it seem as if there are aliens or some other unsolved mystery. Skeptics routinely ignore this second possibility, but if it's true, not only is it necessary to explain the unsolved mysteries, but there must be a motive for all the efforts to make it seem as if there are aliens when they haven't been here at all.
Alien Abductions, which Richard Dolan relies heavily on in this book, is by far not the most reliable evidence in my opinion, however there are dozens, if not well over a hundred claims that have been reported, or if you count the anonymous cases cited by researchers like David Jacobs, Bud Hopkins or John Mack there are hundreds if not thousands, or by some estimates possibly even millions of them, but few of the can be confirmed independently. It certainly would help if there was at least one case with strong supporting evidence, and there are probably more than one, including Wikipedia: The Travis Walton UFO incident 11/05/1975 which has six witnesses to the UFO sighting and the claim that he disappeared at that time. Additional evidence was presented when the police investigated it and initially thought the witnesses might be murder suspects, but he reappeared just over five days after he disappeared. The witnesses all passed lie detector tests and no one could come close to explaining what happened to him, assuming his claims weren't at least partly true.
This certainly should be considered of something unexplained. However, even though this is the one with the strongest evidence to confirm it, there are dozens if not thousands more, including Bettie and Barney Hill, Fran Drescher who played the Nanny in The Nanny, at least two former candidates for the house of representatives, including Bob Salas who is also the leading witness at a Malmstrom Air Force Base where nuclear weapons were allegedly disabled by a UFO, Kirsan Ilyumzhinov a Russian politician and millionaire, and at least two or three somewhat well known cases, in addition to the hundreds if not thousands of cases allegedly investigated by Jacobs, Hopkins, Mack and several other abductee researchers, which is enough to determine that either there is something to this phenomena or there's a massive effort to make it seem real when it isn't. This doesn't necessarily mean that David Jacobs, who Richard Dolan relies most on is the most credible source; personally I think John Mack is more credible, but he's more cautious before drawing solid conclusions.
The credibility problems for many UFO researchers aren't limited to Alien Abduction researchers, although they often have the least conclusive evidence, and they often make mistakes so obvious that it's hard to imagine they shouldn't have known about it and fixed them. In the past including an article, Is Stanton Friedman working for the CIA to refute reverse engineering claims?, I speculated about the possibility that this might be partially intentional. Whether this theory is right or not, the blunders by many believers are real, and it may make it easy for many so-called skeptics to believe they're wrong about everything; however, despite these blunders there are many ;legitimate unsolved mysteries that the believers point out which the skeptics can't explain without making their own blunders. People that want to get to the truth have to correct the blunders on both sides, not ridiculing the opposing side while ignoring their own blunders.
In this previous article I cited William Cooper's claim that Stanton Friedman and numerous other people were working for the CIA which he reports in Behold a Pale Horse 1990, and also pointed out that William Cooper has significant credibility problems; nevertheless, In consider it a serious possibility that he's telling the truth about many high profile people having CIA connections, not because he's a credible source, but because this would make sense if the CIA wanted to control the narrative and they were able to do it. If anything the CIA's ability to control who has a high profile image has improved since 1990 making it more likely that they can ensure that only those with their support can get media coverage now that the media is only controlled by six corporations and there's good reason to believe that the CIA has an enormous amount of influence over these six corporations.
Additional people that William Cooper has claimed have ties to the CIA include John Lear, William Moore, Jaime Shandera, John Grace, Bob Lazar, John Keel, Charles Berlitz, Bruce Maccabee, Linda Moulton Howe, Philip Klass, James Moseley, Wendelle Stevens, Dr. J. Allen Hynek, and who knows how many more people. Cooper claims that he saw documents that back this up, although numerous other UFO researchers have ridiculed this claim; however, other sources including Richard Dolan have confirmed that John Lear and William Moore have both been employed by the CIA, and some of this evidence might have been available prior to 1990; furthermore, if they did work for the CIA that would explain some of their behavior throughout the years. Richard Dolan also provides some potential evidence that Luis Elizondo may also be working for the CIA, although he doesn't completely elaborate on it, his book says
Tucker Carlson: You think the U.S. government has debris from a UFO in its possession right now?
Luis Elizondo: Unfortunately, Tucker, I really have to be careful of my NDA. I really can't go into a lot more detail than that, but simply put yes.
Now, you would think that exchange might have been enough to stir up a large public conversation, but other than within the UFO research community itself very little has changed. (Alien Agendas p.8-9)
Richard Dolan doesn't elaborate as much as he could have and perhaps should have; Luis Elizondo has been portrayed as a whistle-blower repeatedly, yet he managed to get media coverage from numerous mainstream media outlets that don't help real whistle-blowers get their message out, and he even says or implies he's abiding by an NDA or non-disclosure agreement, which real whistle-blowers don't do. Furthermore, why doesn't the media ever discuss the obvious implications if NDAs in the first place or whether or not they're used to cover up information that the public should have access to in a functioning democracy? If they were more interested in getting information to the public that we need then they would have and they would have pointed out that non-disclosure agreements are essentially legal contracts designed to deprive the public of information they need, which is also a conspiracy, by definition.
This makes sense if this is part of a controlled disclosure effort where accurate information is often mixed up with false information and released through unreliable sources, especially since Tucker Carlson is one of the least credible sources from mainstream media, which has few if any credible pundits. Furthermore, past disclosures that have been reported by mainstream media, however briefly before falling down the memory hole, have shown that the tobacco industry has used trade secrecy laws or NDAs to cover up how dangerous their products were, the oil industry used them to hide knowledge about climate change, Congressmen used them to cover-up sexual harassment claims when they paid the alleged victims while claiming they were false accusations. In the last case, if not all the cases, NDAs have been used to cover-up criminal activity, assuming the complaints are legitimate, which they almost certainly are, or cover-up the fact that plaintiffs were literally able to extract funds, often paid by taxpayers, by making false claims, which is highly unlikely.
Richard Dolan also speculates about the possibility that aliens have altered our DNA about forty thousand years ago. His leading source for this is Colleen Clements and he cites the sudden introduction of the D allele in our DNA as possible evidence for this theory. Personally, with my background, I can neither confirm or refute this theory, although I find it highly unlikely that leading academics including Richard Dawkins would agree with this theory, and it should be subject to peer review like any other theory. It almost certainly wouldn't gain much support now; nevertheless, even though I agree it needs to be confirmed I'm not completely ruling out the possibility that it might be partly true. I wouldn't present a strong theory without additional support; however, I the way they taught us about The Missing Link in school over forty years ago is very different from the way they teach it now. Now they say there are many missing links but previously it was taught as if there was one missing link that was much bigger than anything else.
Ironically Richard Dolan goes on to say that after they theoretically altered our DNA they did little or nothing to influence our development since then, with the possible exception of activities since World War II, including the alleged increase in alien abductions. If the aliens did alter our DNA forty thousand years ago or so there's little or no chance they would have just observed since then and there's plenty of evidence, often more convincing than his claims about a D allele, to show otherwise, and as a regular contributor to Ancient Aliens he must know about it. One of the strongest pieces of evidence for the Ancient Aliens theory is the enormous number of megaliths weighing much more than should have been possible to move with ancient technology according to experiments that couldn't move anything bigger than ten tons without cheating and couldn't move anything bigger than forty tons even with some cheating; yet, ancient civilizations moved thousand of megaliths over fifty tons including over a hundred more than a hundred tons and at least seven or eight more than seven hundred tons!
These megaliths are clearly related to many ancient religions, mostly considered Pagan by modern Christians, Muslims or Jews; however, the same religions that reject pagan religions adopted many of their beliefs from them and forgot the history of how their own religion was formed; and a few of the ancient megaliths, including many at the Temple Mount, with the biggest one well over five hundred tons and many Egyptian obelisks that were later moved by Catholics may have been part of some unknown intelligence, alien or not, that impacted their religions. Furthermore, Richard Dolan acknowledges alleged telepathic messages supposedly coming from the aliens, which might be very similar to alleged revelations. If this is true then it opens up possibilities that aliens have had much more influence on the development of our society that he acknowledges.
Furthermore, we also have some methods to narrow down the motive of any unknown advanced intelligence that might be mistaken for God as Epicurus pointed out about 2,200 years ago when he said:
“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”
The clear implication of this is that if God or an unknown advanced intelligence of some sort mistaken for God isn't looking out primarily for our best interests and is almost guaranteed to have other motives of his own, although it's unlikely to be pure good or pure evil as many religions seem to believe or imply. If this unknown advanced intelligence does exist, whether you call it God, aliens or anything else, then at best it's withholding advice for thousands of years that could have prevented many disasters, including wars, or helped deal with many others, if not completely prevent them including plagues or natural disasters; or at worst it inspired some atrocities, including wars that were inspired by irrational beliefs encouraged by this so-called God.
If this advanced intelligence exists, we should be asking what they gain for themselves by withholding helpful advice and allowing atrocities to happen, instead of assuming that God is benevolent and trying to figure out how this helps or why we're being punished, both of which are clearly false. Numerous UFO researchers, including Richard Dolan have suggested that some of the aliens are trying to help us; if so how can we tell which ones are putting our best interest at the top of their agenda? They would be the ones that communicate openly and honestly with all of us, not just a small number of elites, which means they don't exist. If they look out for our best interests at times, it's only because it's also in their best interests as well, or at least it doesn't interfere with their agenda. If there are competing agendas among the aliens, they've agreed with each other not to expose each others agendas.
Richard Dolan and many other UFO researchers think there's a strong possibility that aliens are using us for research purposes; if so, then we shouldn't assume that they're looking out for our best interests anymore than human researchers are looking out for the best interests of animals, or even humans, that they use for research purposes. Even without aliens, there's good reason to believe, from other researchers including Harriet Washington author of "Medical Apartheid" and "Deadly Monopolies" or Marcia Angell author of "The Truth About the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What to Do About It" that shows that those with the least amount of political power, often minorities, are the ones used for research without necessarily benefiting from it, while the wealthy keep the profits for improved medicare and have access to it that the poor can't afford. If anything, available evidence indicates that what ever the aliens, or an unknown intelligence religious people refer to as "God" are doing our best interests aren't their top priority, which is all the more reason why we should stop trusting our leaders and demand disclosure with peer review not controlled by insiders.
However, perhaps the most important omission from Richard Dolan's theories in this book, which he clearly must have known about, was the claim by many people, which he previously reported on, that aliens were sharing technology with our government or corporations closely tied to our government, some by reverse engineering, and perhaps more with direct contact. In a previous book, "UFOs and the National Security State: The Cover-Up Exposed, 1973-1991" 2009. Richard Dolan reported on numerous sources that claimed that the US government or corporations were either reverse engineering alien technology or communicating directly with them to develop it, and if true, a large portion of this technology is being used for military purposes. However, if you review the sources that he cites they all have credibility problems, although some of his sources are very prominent, including John Lear, a former CIA officer and son of the inventor of the Lear jet, which raises the question of why so many prominent people would make these claims in a manner that seems to have credibility problems.
One omission from his previous that I found unusual is perhaps the most credible and thorough of these claims, Philip Corso's book "The Day After Roswell," even if this one still has some problems. Dolan hardly discusses the exchange of technology when considering the Alien Agendas, yet you would think it would be a major part of their agenda if they're either allowing their technology to be shared through reverse engineering as Corso claims, or intentionally and directly sharing technology as some of Dolans other sources claim.
The only significant mention of the exchange of technology in his most recent book does cite Corso's book though, but hardly discusses the fact that most of his book is about sharing technology and reverse engineering, including an enormous amount with military implications, a lot of which was already developed. His brief mention of Corso's book discusses one of the technologies that they couldn't figure out as of the time he published it in 1997 from Chapter 14 of Corso's book (p.122-3 of Dolan's book) which says:
The medical examiner wrote that measurements of brain activity taken from the EBE who was still barely alive at Roswell showed that its electronic signature, at least what they were able to measure with equipment in 1947, displayed a signal similar to what we would call long, low frequency waves. And the examiner referred to a description by one of the Roswell Army Air Field doctors that the creature’s brain lobes seem to have been not just physiologically and neurologically integrated but integrated by an electromagnetic current as well. p.192
.....
... the aliens had used some form of brain wave control for navigation. How they directed their thoughts or translated them into an electronic circuit, we didn’t know. But we knew that there were no steering wheels or conventional methods of control on the spacecraft, and the headbands we found with the electronic sensors on them were designed to pick up some form of signal from the brain.
The analysts at Wright Field believed that the sensors on the headbands corresponded with points on the multi lobed alien brain that generated low frequency waves, so the headbands formed an integral part of the circuit. p.196
Corso might not have known it at the time he died, but within ten years of his book being published they developed very similar implants that enabled handicapped people to partly control a computer, and within another ten years after that it was improved so they could at least partly control bionic limbs, although I can't guarantee it's the same exact technology. Between ten and fifteen years ago a handicapped person with electrodes in his head showed how he could draw a circle using implants in his head, which was shown on TV; it wasn't a very good circle, but it showed some degree of control, and the technology improved in the last ten to fifteen years. The latest devices may not even need the implants, although these are still in the experimental stages, they've shown that it almost certainly can be developed. Richard Dolan should have known about this but didn't mention it in his book.
If aliens have been sharing technology could these advancements be a result of it? Could much more research be a result of it? It's virtually guaranteed that if technology has been shared a lot of this is a result of it, probably including those similar if not identical to the technology Corso describes. If technology has been exchanged a lot more, possibly including the manipulation of monkey DNA which I reported previously on in another article may be a result of this and it may also provide circumstantial evidence making Richard Dolan's theory about the introduction of the D allele more likely. Another possibility is that the recent developments in the past few days about a successful transplant of a kidney from a pig to a human, which hasn't been rejected yet. If for the sake of argument, alien abductions are real and they include medical experimentation on the abductees, they don't involve obtaining informed consent from the abductees any more than our scientists obtain informed consent from the pigs. Nor do our scientists inform the majority of the public about their research ahead of time and consult them when developing ethical standards.
Theoretically this research could be done for the benefit of society; but if that was their intention they would provide disclosure and allow much more improvement in health care that wasn't so controversial, including Medicare for All. Furthermore, with or without the existence of alien technology, the vast majority of the benefits for research, especially in the United states, are only going to a small percentage of the public. When it comes to the most advanced experimental research, I wouldn't expect it to be available to most people until they're sure it's safe; however, when it comes to more conclusive research, especially when it doesn't involve transplants without consent from the donor, in the United States a shocking percentage of the public doesn't have access to good affordable health care, with or without alien technology, even though many other countries have shown it can be done much safer and more cost efficient.
Furthermore, if this technology is from aliens, a large portion of it doesn't benefit the majority at all, and it's being used to control and oppress people all over the world. In many cases the first use for new scientific research and development is often controlled by the military industrial complex. This includes some of the technology that Philip Corso claims was obtained from aliens, including the development of Kevlar bullet proof vests, night vision goggles, many aircraft, including stealth technology, and much more, supposedly technology developed at Area 51 or other secret bases. At one point in his book Richard Dolan indicated he thought the aliens might prefer to deal with an authoritarian centralized government and might be waiting for this to form, as if they weren't helping to encourage this. He also expressed concern about the fact that our civilization is increasingly being controlled by a small fraction of the public with the illusion of democracy while that small fraction of the public controls virtually all of the media.
This certainly is a legitimate concern; however, if technology has been exchanged, the assumption that it's happening independent of alien influence is false, since a large portion of the alien technology, if not all of it, is being controlled by the military and they're using that technology to control people all over the world and maintain a permanent state of war, which, combined with environmental destruction and other social problems could result in the destruction of our society as we now know it. If the aliens are an advanced intelligence they presumably know much more about the inevitable consequences, and they could either advise on how to avoid using advanced technology for all the wrong reasons or refuse to share it at all. Of course, many people, including Philip Corso, claim that the exchange of technology is the result of reverse engineering; however, even if this is partly true, there's little doubt that the aliens could have controlled their own technology if they wanted to, after all, if they've been around for thousands of years they avoided crashes like Roswell for a long time, until about the time we had scientists that might have been capable of reverse engineering part of this technology.
If there's an unknown advanced intelligence influencing or observing the development of our society they withheld advice about avoiding war while advanced technology was being developed just like they withheld similar advice while wars based on lies were fought with older technology, including the Crusades, Inquisitions, Holocaust, and many more wars.
Furthermore, if there has been contact, as many UFO researchers including Richard Dolan seem to believe, it's almost certain that there's some form of control group to discuss any alleged arrangements or deals they might make; and the most common claim about this group is the MJ-12 documents, claiming that a dozen high ranking people were chosen during the Truman administration to control their dealings with aliens. Other theories about a control group include the Deep State, which if researched well may be credible, or the Illuminati, which usually has serious credibility problems. However, even though many of these theories have serious credibility problems they may be worth considering at least to narrow things down so we might recognize which ones might be possible, and, in some cases perhaps even learn from the false ones.
Some of these theories even consider the possibility that historical figures or groups were part of the Illuminati including the Knights Templar, the Rosicrucians, the Theosophical Society, and many alleged religious prophets that supposedly received revelations from God; however, many of these have serious, and often obvious, flaws that many religious people are unwilling to see. For starters many of the people allegedly chosen by God, including the Knights Templar, who were allegedly doing God's will by fighting the Crusades were routinely betrayed either by God or the religious leaders allegedly representing God. When the at least one Royal Family and Catholic Church thought they had too much power they arranged for them to be smeared and accused of crimes, justifiable or not, tortured and forced to confess before being executed.
This wasn't the exception, if this God exists it's routine for him to allow his most devout worshipers to be tortured, abused or killed in a variety of ways; Jesus Christ was nailed to the cross and tortured to death, Joan of Ark was inspired to fight a war against the English instead of learning how to free the people without a permanent state of war then, when it presumably no longer served God's purposes what ever they were he allowed her to be burned at the stake, and there were many more so-called Saints that were made to suffer in a variety of ways for incomprehensible reasons, including the Stigmata, one of the most of these was Padre Pio, who did live a long life, but it was almost always in pain and he often had many illnesses. This isn't limited to Catholics; the Mormons were taught that four groups that left Israel thousands of years ago in the Book of Mormon were the chosen ones and of the two most prominent groups, the Nephites and Laminites, the Nephites were supposed to be the true believers while the Laminites were the wicked rivals of the Nephites, yet God eventually allegedly allowed the Laminites to defeat the Nephites and exterminate them. According to Mormon mythology the Laminites were the Native Americans found by the Vikings and later Columbus, although traditional archaeology provides no support for this belief and overwhelmingly refutes it.
Of course, the most widely recognized chosen people were the Jews, but God allegedly allowed them to be sold into slavery to the Egyptians, before saving them in a dramatic fashion that didn't involve letting the Pharaoh to get off with a warning and let the Jews go, instead God decided to "harden Pharaoh’s heart" so that he could "gain glory" (Exodus 14:4) by destroying the Pharaoh and all his soldiers who blindly obeyed orders, which is what the Egyptians, Jews, Christians, and many other worshipers of God are taught to do from birth.
Am I the only one that noticed this is brazen entrapment?
And of course this alleged God didn't stop there; he arranged for the Jews who were his chosen people to eventually defeat the Caananites "not because you are so good or have such integrity that you are about to occupy their land. The LORD your God will drive these nations out ahead of you only because of their wickedness ..... God is not giving you this good land because you are good, for you are not—you are a stubborn people." Deuteronomy 9:5-6 Bible verses like this and many others should raise major doubts about the claim that God, assuming he exists, is a credible source of morality and can be trusted to judge us in a fair way. This is one of the few times that God helped his Jewish chosen people for thousands of years either arranging for them to be persecuted for reasons just as bad or arranging it, starting with their defeat by the Babylons, then the Romans, both of who were non-believers in the one true God, like the Laminites, and dozens of more purges or pogroms, until he either arranged, or allowed, the Holocaust, which no benevolent God would ever do. And of course a review of the history of Christians, Muslims, or many other religions isn't any better.
We're supposed to believe that a God that behaves like that is being good to us? Religious people either refuse to look critically at their own beliefs and history or they go through incredible leaps of logic to convince themselves that God deserves to be worshiped.
It's tempting to go to the other extreme, which many religious people often do when their beliefs are challenged, and assume that God or another advanced intelligence mistaken for God, must be evil for the sake of evil and may even be amused by all these atrocities and the fact that so many religious people fall for these scams; however, if there is an advanced intelligence mistaken for God, it is almost certainly looking out for his or their own best interests regardless of the best interests of the human race, and religion has proven to be a very effective control process regardless of God's motive.
If there has been an unknown advanced intelligence influencing the human race for thousands of years, whether you call it God, Aliens, or anything else, this history should raise major doubts about their credibility and anyone exchanging technology with them in exchange for allowing them to continue their activities in secret should be considered extremely foolish, especially since the technology that has been developed so rapidly over the past seventy years, since Corso claims he began sharing it, has been used for extremely shallow purposes to benefit a small fraction of the public, and when you consider the epidemic levels of environmental destruction and other social problems, including a permanent state of war, then there should major concerns about destroying our own society.
There should be no doubt that if there was a deal between aliens and the political establishment, as many UFO researchers believe, then those involved in it must know much more about it than the rest of us, although there's no guarantee that many of the things they think they know are accurate, or that they might be missing on important information creating major risks for us all, as many worshipers of God or an unknown advanced intelligence, perhaps aliens, mistaken for God found out the hard way, assuming they acknowledged the fact that this perceived God was betraying them all along.
If there is an unknown advanced intelligence, possibly aliens, or the so-called Greys, that's sharing technology, then this background is worth serious consideration; however, even though those that allegedly began sharing the technology should have considered this, there's no guarantee they did. Nevertheless, if Philip Corso is partly right about sharing technology, then it's virtually guaranteed that it impacts most if not all advanced technology developed in the past several decades, if not since 1947, approximately when contact was first made. And if this is true, and if the establishment is denying it, they have to have an alternative explanation for the development of this technology, which they do, whether this theory is true or not.
And this explanation is shrouded in secrecy, and lots of irrational behavior that makes little or no sense. Nevertheless, if this theory is partly true there might be supporting evidence scattered in different locations, even though it's almost certainly mixed up with false information. Whether there's a massive effort to cover up alien activity that does exist or a massive effort to make there is alien activity when there isn't, a large percentage of the sources come from the military, and there's little doubt that the military is involved in the development of some of the most advanced technology in the past seventy years, whether it comes from aliens or not.
There's no doubt that they conduct an enormous amount of their activities, when they can, in secret, and often get caught lying; this includes how they spend their money. They've never passed an audit and throughout much of their history they may not have even been subjected to audits. In recent years they've admitted they can't account for enormous amounts of money with some estimates saying at least twenty-one trillion dollars can't be accounted for and other estimates say at least thirty-five trillion dollars can't be accounted for. If they are developing alien technology this could be where a large portion of their money is going. There are even numerous books documenting their fraud, most of which don't mention alien technology at all, including "Prophets of War," by William D. Hartung which documents the history of Lockheed Martin, and seem very credible and well sourced at first.
However, there are large omissions which a book about Lockheed Martin should almost certainly include even if it doesn't discuss rumors, which many people consider Conspiracy Theories about exchanging of alien technology, including the development of Stealth Technology which is widely known to have been developed by Lockheed Martin. It does open with a chapter of two stealth fighters, F-22 Raptor and the F-35 Lightning II, but it doesn't mention the fact that these are both stealth fighters, nor does he discuss the development of this technology. Nor does he even mention the most famous stealth fighter for a long time, the F-117 Nighthawk. This stealth fighter was admittedly developed at Groom Lake, Nevada, also known as Area 51, where there's allegedly been an enormous amount of activities involving aliens, including the sharing of technology. Nevertheless, even if I think there's plenty of background that should have at least been summarized in a book like this it does expose an enormous amount of waste by the military industrial complex, which could theoretically be partially explained if it's a result of using alien technology. And if it's a result of alien technology, it could shed some light on the agenda of the aliens that allowed it to be shared. If so, they're allowing our government to dominate the world, often bombing third world countries, killing many innocent people.
Hartung describes how the F-22 Raptor is one of the most advanced planes in history, but it serves no practical purpose, since there's no other country that can provide it with a reasonable challenge and other less expensive planes are always more practical to use. He claims that it wasn't even needed in either the Afghanistan or Iraq wars, although it wasn't developed in time for the initial invasions. In his opening chapter Hartung describes how Lockheed Martin went on a massive advertising and lobbying campaign to ensure that it would stay in production, even though it served no practical purpose and even many people from the military didn't want it. They almost won, but their consolation prize was that instead of buying more Rapters, the Pentagon bought much more F-35 Lightning II's, which were much less expensive, but since they bough so many, the prophets for Lockheed Martin were much higher.
They also banned exports of this plane, since it was so advanced, but amazingly several politicians including Senator Daniel Inouye wanted to authorize a version of this that could be exported, and said he could get the ban lifted; however, he passed away without doing so and no other politician has succeeded yet. Nevertheless, there are an enormous number of other Stealth Bombers being exported, including the F-35 Lightning II, which means that this technology is helping to maintain a permanent state of war and escalating arms race, whether it's made with alien technology or not.
Richard Dolan tries to claim or imply that our society is developing naturally and the aliens are for the most part just observing, except for the alien abductions and possible manipulation of the D alelle forty thousands of years ago, but if they allowed this technology to develop without communicating then they're having a major impact on our development. If there's no intervention by the aliens, then it can be argued, even if many people disagree, they had no obligation to intervene with all our wars based on lies. Those that disagree might believe it would be the moral thing to do to at least communicate and advise on how to avoid wars based on lies. However, if they're sharing the technology, and possibly making secret deals with our political establishment and major corporations, that would make them complicit, although it wouldn't excuse our political leaders for their part in these atrocities.
Furthermore, if many UFO researchers, including Richard Dolan, believe that technology is being shared, or at least that it's a strong possibility, then why aren't they going one step further and speculating about how many major changes are being made by this technology, and how it's being used for the benefit for a small minority of the public instead of everyone. This is especially important when considering epidemic levels of environmental destruction and it's impact on Climate Change.
Why aren't any of these researchers that consider it possible that alien technology is being shared exploring how it could have impacted technological developments going back at least to the fifties, which would be a few years after they allegedly began retrieving technology, giving them time to develop something, although not the most complicated things. These same researchers are aware that about the same time our government allegedly retrieved technology near Roswell and several other locations the Russians allegedly had their own opportunities to retrieve alien technology at Kapustin Yar or other locations under their control. If they retrieved this technology approximately in 1947, as many reports seem to claim then both Russia and the United States would have had ten to twelve years before they launched Sputnik 1 and Explorer 1, followed by dozens more satellites being launched non-stop since then. If they were reverse engineering alien technology are we supposed to assume these launches are unrelated to the alien technology?
It seems almost guaranteed that if they were studying alien technology at the same time they were developing these satellites that they benefited from the alien technology. Furthermore, several researchers including Victor Marchetti have disclosed that there was a massive network of spy satellites that were launched almost as soon as they began launching any satellites, and these were often used to spy on all of us, not just the Soviet Union. If that's the case then alien technology might have been partially responsible for the massive surveillance state that has been developing since then.
Furthermore, there's also plenty of alleged disclosures indicating that they may have made first contact with one of the aliens as early as 1947, and that there might have been a much larger meeting in the mid-sixties. There's no guarantee that many if any of these reports are trustworthy; however, if alien technology has been developed we shouldn't completely rule it out as skeptics try to. If this was partly true, then other rumors about a possible deal between aliens and our government, possibly with participation from MJ-12, that are also disclosed with credibility problems, could also be partly true.
What about the Moon Landing, or conspiracy theories about it being faked or that they encountered an alien base there? These certainly seem absurd, and few rational people believe them; but if we have been developing alien technology isn't it almost guaranteed that it was used for space travel including the Moon Landings. And if there was a deal made with the aliens to exchange technology, why isn't any high profile researcher speculating about the possibility that instead of faking it, the Moon Landing might have been accomplished with assistance, one way or another from the aliens?
Michael E. Salla, Ph.D wrote a reasonably good article about Colonel Philip Corso and his Critics: Crossing the Rubicon between Objective Criticism and Debunking; although I don't agree with all his claims, even in this article; and some of his other writings go much further, although they may not all be quite as credible, and even if they are close to the truth few would believe him. Summations and excerpts of his books seem to imply that he thinks our government, primarily our military, is already developing a much more extensive relationship with the aliens, which might even include joint operations on bases around the world, or possibly even on the Moon or Mars. A brief look at the introduction of a couple of his books might seem a little more credible than I might have expected him to be, or at least some parts of it; but even if it's not, it adds more relatively high profile people, some with Ph.D's joining in an effort to make it seem as if contact has been made even if it wasn't, which raises the question of why they would fake it.
I certainly wouldn't recommend people rush to believe this, especially without doing some fact checking; however, if there is some exchange of technology with aliens then this is huge, and the implications are enormous so it is very likely they might try something similar to this even if he and other fringe conspiracy theorists don't get the details right, so I wouldn't rush to rule it out either. Furthermore, if alien technology has been shared as extensively as Corso and others claim then it's had an enormous impact on every aspect of our society and as I pointed out in Do Aliens own Stock in Monsanto, DuPont, or Microsoft? and Who's Controlling Oligarchies Dividing The Market? Aliens? it means that dozens of billionaires didn't make their massive fortune as a result of their own genius, they made it with the help of alien technology, and if there were deals made decades ago in secret the aliens may have far more influence on our economy and society than the vast majority of us do. Furthermore, with or without help from alien technology, the vast majority of decisions by our government are made by oligarchs and the public doesn't even understand the basis for these decisions.
If this theory isn't partly or completely true, then there has to be another explanation for many of the related unsolved mysteries and why so many people, including many from the military, are trying to make it seem as if we have contacted aliens and shared technology. Most-so-called skeptics simply pretend these mysteries don't exist, which, despite all the flaws from the UFO researchers, might actually make their theories more credible.
At least they're not ignoring many major unsolved mysteries.
The following are related sources or articles:
100+ Alien Abduction Stories That Will Make You Believe 04/14/2021
20 Real People Who Claim to Have Been Abducted by Aliens 09/23/2021
Florida candidate for Congress: Alien abduction doesn't define me 08/24/2018
Ballotpedia: Robert Salas (Democratic Party) ran for election to the U.S. House to represent California's 26th Congressional District. He lost in the primary on March 3, 2020.
Facebook: Robert Salas
Robert Salas "Unidentified: The UFO Phenomenon: How World Governments Have Conspired to Conceal Humanity's Biggest Secret" 2014
Russian Governor Claims He Was Abducted by Aliens 05/06/2010
Wikipedia: Kirsan Ilyumzhinov Russian politician, millionaire and alleged alien abductee
5 Futuristic Mind-Controlled Prosthetics 08/31/2020
Robotic Arm Controlled with Brain Implant 12/19/2012
New Mind-Controlled Robotic Arm Works Without Brain Implants 06/24/2019
Implants enable man to control prosthetics with ‘thoughts’ 10/21/2019
Surgeons tested a pig kidney transplant in a human patient — and for the first time, it worked 10/20/2021
What does the first successful test of a pig-to-human kidney transplant mean? 10/22/2021
Colonel Philip Corso and his Critics: Crossing the Rubicon between Objective Criticism and Debunking by Michael E. Salla, Ph.D
Exopolitics.org: Michael Salla
US Air Force Secret Space Program: Shifting Extraterrestrial Alliances & Space Force Paperback – May 20, 2019 by Michael Salla
The US Navy's Secret Space Program and Nordic Extraterrestrial Alliance (Secret Space Programs) (Volume 2) Paperback – February 28, 2017 by Michael Salla
HILLARY’S UNYIELDING MONSANTO LOYALTY ACTUALLY REVEALS SEVERAL RED FLAGS, YET SHE WILL WIN, BUT... 11/08/2016
Bush tours Monsanto (1987) 05/21/2013
After failing 3 times in a row, Pentagon admits it won’t pass an audit till 2027 11/17/2020
The Pentagon Has Never Passed An Audit. Some Senators Want To Change That 05/19/2021
The Pentagon’s $35 Trillion Accounting Black Hole 01/23/2020
Holding U.S. Treasurys? Beware: Uncle Sam Can't Account For $21 Trillion 01/19/2019
Area 51's Most Outrageous Top Secret Spy Plane Projects 02/04/2020
US has cloaked bomber jets made using alien technology, proves UFO hunter with picture 10/18/2020
Is the U.S. Air Force B-1 Bomber Using an Alien Cloaking Device? 06/02/2021
Wikipedia: Stealth aircraft
Wikipedia: Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk
Wikipedia: Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor
Wikipedia: Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II
The Arms Bazaar: From Lebanon to Lockheed. by Anthony Sampson
The Arms Bazaar: From Lebanon to Lockheed. 1977 by Anthony Sampson https://archive.org/details/armsbazaarfromle00samprich/page/20/mode/2up
Lockheed Ex‐Official Says Initiative In Bribe Cases Came From Japanese 12/20/1976 Lockheed Sales Mission:70 Days in Tokyo by A. Carl Kotchian
Former Sen. Harry Reid thinks Lockheed Martin may have UFO fragments 05/1/2021
Former Lockheed Martin engineer from Texas: I met aliens at Area 51 10/30/2014 Boyd Bushman doesn't make a credible case, but he adds to the long list of high profile people making absurd claims, and he hasn't always been this irrational.
Wikipedia: Kapustin Yar
Wikipedia: Sputnik 1
Wikipedia: Sputnik 2
Wikipedia: Sputnik 3
Wikipedia: Explorer 1
Wikipedia: Vanguard 1
Wikipedia: Corona (satellite)
Wikipedia: Moon landing
Wikipedia: Apollo 11
Behold a Pale Horse By William Cooper 1991
Behold a Pale Horse By William Cooper 1990
The Secret Government - Origin, Identity and Purpose of MJ-12 By William Cooper
William Cooper "Behold A Pale Horse" 1990
No comments:
Post a Comment