Barack Obama Gives Us Permission To Take UFOs Seriously, But Not Honestly!

For decades the mainstream media has practically never covered UFOs at all, and on the rare occasions where they do they only cover it briefly as if it was a joke not to be taken seriously and without checking any facts. The only notable exception for the past decade or so has been the Ancient Aliens series on the History Channel, and a few other rare and lower profile shows. However, these shows are almost never taken in a serious manner. This wasn't always the case; some of the best research was done decades ago when some people still took it seriously.

That began to change a little when Barrack Obama admitted they couldn't explain what they are, and a few other people from the mainstream media admitted that although they couldn't prove they were alien crafts, they couldn't rule it out either. In the beginning of May there were a few traditional reports treating the upcoming disclosures, as a result of a clause in the COVID relief bill requiring them, a few media pundits treated it as a joke, as usual; but this changed almost overnight after Barack Obama's statements, when most reporters suddenly treated it like a serious subject.

However, they're ignoring a long history of UFO research, some very good, although it's often mixed up with bad research for us to sort through, and one of the things they focus on the most is the potential that they might attack, which is silly since they've been around for decades, if not thousands of years, and if they were going to attack they would have done so already. They've also speculated about the possibility that some of it could be Russian and Chinese and that they might be a threat to us, which isn't much more credible.

Caitlin Johnstone has pointed out the flaws with this argument in a series of at least four articles. (1, 2, 3, 4) The truth of the matter is that nothing has changed dramatically in the appearance of the UFOs and the research into them except for the fact that the mainstream cable news is mentioning it at all; so the only difference is that more people are paying attention. Many people, often including me, have ridiculed the Ancient Aliens series on the History Channel because they've always made an excessive amount of obvious scientific blunders and they over hype everything without presenting it in a credible manner; however, despite all their flaws, they're still much more credible than the mainstream media, since they don't ignore as much research, although we have to be careful to sort out all the false information. So any good researcher has to be prepared to learn as much traditional science as they can to recognize many obvious false claims.

Just because they're finally covering the subject in traditional media doesn't mean they're covering the most basic principles, which is more important than most people realize, since they've made little or no effort to explain this in the past to the majority of the public, instead treating it like a joke. Some of the best research on the subject is decades old, when it was taken seriously by some people. This includes coverage of many major UFO sightings that many people have forgotten about, and some of the skeptical arguments as to why they couldn't be from another solar system. Another thing to keep in mind is that there's been an enormous number of these reports and hundreds of credible witnesses or researchers over the decades; which means, either there's something to this, or there's a massive effort to make it seem like there is when it's false, which may be even more bizarre than the existence of aliens from another solar system.

One of the strongest arguments why UFOs couldn't possibly be from other planets decades ago was that they were just too far and it was impossible to travel faster than the speed of light to get here in a reasonable time. This argument hasn't been completely refuted; however rapid advancements in science have overcome many of the obstacles, especially if you consider the possibility that they rely on automation, artificial intelligence, advance propulsion and many other technologies that are developing far faster than anyone suspected might happen fifty years ago.

Furthermore, there have been dozens of claims, some more credible than others, like those from Philip Corso, who said that he helped share technology developed from crashed alien technology that has been reverse engineered. If true, this would explain how so much new technology developed so fast after thousands of years of comparatively stagnant development. If this is false then there has to be a reason why so many people helped fabricate these stories; and there also have to be other explanations for many other major unsolved mysteries which this theory would begin to explain.

With the media coverage only covering possible hostile motives, which are almost certainly out of the question, it keeps most people distracted from considering other potential motives, or narrowing down their activities to the best of our ability, for example determining whether they arrived shortly after World War II when mass media first reported on UFOs or if they've been here much longer, possibly influencing the movement of ancient megaliths, as many Ancient Aliens theorists seem to believe.

Of course, one of the most famous claims from skeptics of UFOs or any other major unsolved mystery is that, "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence," and that evidence might exist; however, with UFOs and many other unsolved mysteries that evidence, if it exists, often requires a close look at the facts, which many people hesitate to do. This is why extraordinary evidence that gets right to the point may be a good place to start, and the best example of this that I know of may be ancient megaliths, which we know were moved long distances. I went into this more in 107 Wonders of the Ancient World where I explained that experiments were done to move megaliths up to ten tons successfully; in some cases they included efforts to erect the megaliths or get them onto a sledge, which was used to tow them, proving this could be done. There were some cases with megaliths eight to ten tons where they cheated to get them on the sledge, but all experiments above ten tons, up to forty tons cheated to get them onto the sledge. With the larger megaliths, including at least one twenty five tons and another forty tons, they were only able to move them short distances with an enormous amount of problems, including broken ropes or sledges. They didn't even try to move them above forty tons with ancient technology.

To get right to the point, with megaliths between ten and forty tons, even though they cheated for part of the experiments, they still failed.

Roger Hopkins was one of the experimenters on the efforts to move the biggest megaliths and initially said that he would be able to prove that it could be done with ancient technology but was eventually forced to admit that he couldn't figure it out, although he didn't argue it was conclusive evidence it was aliens. I haven't tried to argue that this alone is evidence of influence by aliens; however, it does raise major doubts about the official scientific explanation for the social evolution of the human race, and if anything, proves that it's incomplete, at best, or more likely false. This should be adequate evidence to encourage scientific people to consider at least one or more other theories to explain how the megaliths were moved.

It's hard to imagine how supporters of natural evolution can possibly explain this without some influence from an unknown advanced intelligence of some sort; however, they refuse to seriously consider this possibility anyway, assuming they acknowledge the research. This is, of course, how they continue to portray social evolution as entirely natural, they simply pretend this research doesn't exist, which is highly unscientific.

This should open the door to scientific speculation, with caution not to claim that theories are factual until they're thoroughly reviewed and other possibilities are considered. Yet, when traditional scientists refuse to acknowledge this incredibly obvious flaw in their beliefs they allow Ancient Aliens theorists, despite all their flaws, to do a better job on at least this one subject. This could be a serious mistake, since they might attract some blind believers, without rational scrutiny. In some cases, some of the highest profile theorists, perhaps including Richard Dolan and Nick Pope, may do a fairly good job most of the time; but other theorists, perhaps including David Wilcock, might be fanatical scam artists. To the best of my knowledge David Wilcock hasn't been on the show in three and a half years and may not be coming back, but some supporters of the Ancient Aliens theory, including David Wilcock, support some bizarre claims, often including those supported by QAnon or something similar.

When so-called scientific people resort to ridicule to deal with the subject, while ignoring major unsolved mysteries, like how megaliths were moved, they often appear as ridiculous as fringe believers, which is why it would help for the rest of us to learn the fundamentals of science and sort through it ourselves, since we can't trust either side to do a good job. However, if we start with basics we may be able to narrow down the nature of any unknown advanced intelligence that may have influenced the movement of megaliths thousands of years ago. Prior to the Ancient Aliens theories the most common explanation was that various Gods influenced the movement of the megaliths. Most of these megaliths were moved by what would be considered Pagan religions; however, some of them, including several ancient Egyptian obelisks were relocated by the Christian religion, the biggest one was 455 tons moved to Rome in the fourth century by Constantius II, son of Constantine, and erected under orders from Pope Sixtus V in the sixteenth century, despite experiments that showed this should have been impossible with technology available to them.

If there was an unknown advanced intelligence that was interpreted to be a "God" of some sort, whether it was Pagan or the God of Abraham, worshiped by Jews, Christians and Muslims, then we've had sufficient knowledge to narrow down his characteristics for thousands of years, although the worshipers of this God have been reluctant to believe it. Epicurus once said the following about 2,300 years ago:

“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”

This should be enough to determine that if there is an unknown advanced intelligence that influenced our early social evolution, whether you call it God or alien, then it must have an unknown motive that isn't necessarily in our best interests. If "God" or aliens mistaken for God were benevolent then they could have communicated thousands of years ago and provided much better advice on how to avoid many of the atrocities since then. This is one of the most fundamental ways of narrowing down the characteristics of any unknown advanced intelligence, whether you call it "God" alien or anything else; however a shocking percentage of the public is unwilling to correct fundamental flaws in their beliefs. In the long run, to fix this we'll have to provide much better childhood education teaching fundamental logic. But in the short run, it may be only those ready willing and able to think rationally, and even then many people will be more likely to go along with more popular belief systems, even though they might be logically flawed.

Jacque Vallee once said that we may need an "Invisible College" to study this, or individuals might want to do their own research. He is one of the few good authors on the subject, but even he's not perfect; at one point he claimed that ancient civilizations had the technology and ability to create all the wonders attributed to them, which he should have known isn't true. Nevertheless even though even the best books on UFOs often have a few flaws in them, they're far better than what the mainstream media reports, and in most cases, the best books were written decades ago.

I went into this more myself in UFO Hypothesis with rational use of Occam's Razor which reviews some of the history of UFOs and the evidence surrounding it, which is almost completely ignored by mainstream media, in some cases, even Ancient Aliens on the History Channel ignores some of the most important research, including a lot with fewer scientific blunders. Most UFO theorists assume that in order for aliens to get here from incredibly long distances they have to develop technology that enables them to go faster than the speed of light or find some kind of a short cut, like a theoretical wormhole, of some sort; however, to the best of my knowledge there's no evidence to prove that this is possible. Many people have claimed that without some way to speed up transportation it should be impossible to get here from an inhabitable planet, but that argument may have seemed more credible decades ago, before an enormous amount of technology was developed to overcome many of these obstacles.

If other theorists turn out to be right about traveling the distance much faster, then, of course, it is much more likely that aliens can get here in the first place; but if it's not possible, my Occam's Razor article focuses on the possibility that they can travel over a much longer time, presumably hundreds if not thousands of years, using artificial intelligence, robotics, nanotechnology and many other advanced technology they might have developed to cover this distance; James Hanson, a NASA scientist specializing on Climate Change, also developed a similar science fiction story, as a warning showing how aliens could arrive hundreds of years in the future to see a planet that was destroyed.

It's virtually impossible to tell which of these theories are true, assuming aliens were able to travel the long distances at all; but we can narrow it down to two theories generally, speaking. Either aliens exist and they made it here or not. If they do exist and managed to travel the long distances, either through automation or faster advance space travel then their existence could begin to explain many major mysteries, some going back thousands of years. If not, then there has to be another explanation for all these unexplained mysteries, including how they moved megaliths and other unsolved mysteries, like many mystics, some going back thousands of years as well, UFOs, crop circles, cattle mutilations, and even how our technology suddenly started developing at a much faster rate than it has for thousands of years, after World War II.

If, on the other hand, aliens haven't made it across these long distances, then there has to be another explanation for all these unsolved mysteries. If the scientific establishment, which seems to believe this, wants their theory to be the leading viable one, using scientific methods, they can't ignore all these unsolved mysteries, which is exactly what they're doing. Since they're not doing this, it may be reasonable to consider the Ancient Aliens theory to be the most viable, although with all the flaws on the series from the History Channel, that version wouldn't be the best.

Either there's a massive effort to cover up the fact that aliens exist, and a strong possibility that they also made contact and exchanged technology; or there's a massive effort to make it seem like this is true, when it's not. Either way a large number of people either faking it or covering it up are from the military, and there must be lots of people in the government that know more than they're letting on. There's a strong possibility that this includes Obama and many other officials currently or previously in positions of power, including Hillary Clinton and John Podesta, both who have claimed they wanted disclosure, although they almost certainly know more than they admit, and if alien technology has been shared with corporations, Podesta and Clinton have ties to the same corporations so they have a major conflict of interest.

If there really have been aliens visiting us for decades, since Roswell, or more likely thousands of years when they could have influenced the movement of megaliths, then there's a far greater chance, if not almost guaranteed, that "The Day After Roswell." written by Colonel Philip Corso is surprisingly close to the truth and that not only did he share alien technology with corporations, but there may have been much more exchanges of technology responsible for a large portion of the incredibly rapid advances over the past seventy years, escalating even more over the past twenty or thirty years. If this is true, then it should interest everyone, including those concerned with many other subjects that may be related, including constantly fighting wars based on lies, spying on citizens, a corrupt economic and political system, and many other subjects, since this advanced technology would impact all these subjects.

Another researcher that has reported on numerous sources making similar claims is Richard Dolan author of "UFOs and the National Security State: The Cover-Up Exposed, 1973-1991" 2009. which also discusses the possibility that our government has been in contact with aliens and has made some kind of a deal with them in exchange for their technology. Generally speaking, the most credible researchers, like Allen Hynek and Edward Ruppelt often don't go beyond what they can be absolutely certain of based on evidence.

There's an enormous amount of evidence to indicate that there's been a major unsolved mystery surrounding UFOs for seventy years, and there must be more to it than the hard evidence, which researchers like Hynek and Ruppelt, report on; however, in most cases the theories, with incomplete evidence, are less certain. This doesn't necessarily mean, as many pseudo-skeptics claim or imply that they're all false, just that the need to be confirmed or refuted, like other scientific theories at this stage.

Among the researchers that do go beyond the hard facts associated with UFOs a couple of the most reliable ones include Jacques Vallee and Richard Dolan. Jacques Vallee has been theorizing about how UFOs might have ties to religious beliefs or many more myths for decades; and some of this may be a real possibility, but most of it need additional confirmation if it's true. One possible exception might be the incident at Fatima over a hundred years ago, which I wrote about previously and will mention a little more below.

Richard Dolan is also among the most reliable sources, covering a large number of theories and other people that have claimed that aliens have shared technology with the military, government or corporations, however, if you look carefully not all of his sources are as reputable as many of us would like, and many of them are anonymous, however, he doesn't try to give them more credibility than they deserve. Dolan cites numerous sources, with varying credibility that claim that there has been some contact with aliens; however, once again, all of them need some additional back up evidence to prove they're true, and some of them might be partially or completely discredited. This isn't unusual in UFO research as I pointed out several times including in Alien technology shared? Or Massive & Sophisticated Hoax? where I discussed the Serpo documents, which many followers of UFOs consider credible evidence of contact with aliens.

In my previous article about Serpo, which is an alleged planet allegedly orbiting the Zeta Reticuli star system I pointed out that at least one of the documents attributed to this disclosure can't possibly be true, since it claims that the planet is a little over ninety million miles from each of the stars, but these stars are unusually far apart for a binary system, about 350 billion miles. The large distance may be the only reason why it might be possible for a planet orbiting this star system to have a consistent enough environment for billions of years to develop life, since closer binary systems will fluctuate wildly in temperature depending on what time of year it is; however, it shows that these alleged disclosures are factually inaccurate.

Ideally, of course, I would prefer more reliable sources; however, not all of them have been discredited; and if aliens have shared technology, either reverse engineered, like Philip Corso claimed, or through direct contact like other sources claim some of this speculation is almost certainly close to the truth. Surely if aliens have been here for thousands of years they must have some motive, and if they allowed the sharing of technology, this implies the strong possibility of some kind of a deal, as many of these theories suggest.

In most of my previous articles about this subject I've speculated that if the aliens exist and have reached our planet, possibly thousands of years ago, their most likely motive might be researching various subjects, especially if they couldn't do it elsewhere. This could include research into health care, weather modification and many other subjects. If there is some truth to this then it could explain how rapid technology has advanced over the past seven decades, including the ability to overcome the obstacles that we previously thought would make space travel impossible. Even if there haven't been exchanges of technology, this is worth serious consideration, since there's no doubt there's an enormous amount of research on many subjects, but a large portion of it is only being disclosed in a low profile manner, and the benefits are often given mostly, if not entirely to the wealthy, while the people being used for medical research are almost entirely the poor, often minorities.

An enormous amount of research on this subject is available without consideration of the technology coming from aliens, including "The Truth About Drug Companies" by Dr. Marcia Angell, "Medical Apatheid" and "Deadly Monopolies" by Harriet Washington. The research shown here and many other sources should be taken even without consideration of technology from aliens, assuming it exists, but if it turns out that it does, then we should consider the possibility that alien technology is helping create advances in medical research, and it could add to one more reason why drug companies should be able to gouge us with patents. But whether alien technology influenced this or not, their research showed the development of drugs was done with tax payer money anyway, so this is brazen subsidies for drug companies, and in many cases they price the drugs out of people ability to pay, possibly costing lives, or if they manage to pay for it, the high cost might drive people into bankruptcy.

Another major medical issue that should be discussed much more, with or without alien technology, is organ transplants, perhaps, in many cases without consent, especially in third world countries, including China as I went into in Researching Poor, Slaves, Prisoners, To Benefit Ruling Class With Alien Technology? Once again, there's an enormous amount of evidence showing major problems with unethical organ transplants, sometimes even including "Organ Harvesting" where donors are forced to donate without consent, sometimes even for vital organs, causing their deaths, or "Organ Transplant Tourism," where people from wealthy countries travel to third world countries, including China, to take advantage of unethical organ transplants.

The evidence that this is going on, as I pointed out in that article, and several others, is strong and from credible sources which don't even consider the possibility of medical technology being advanced as a result of help from aliens; however, if Corso is right, then there's a strong possibility that alien technology might impact it as well. With or without alien technology, we need far more disclosure about the source of transplant organs, so that wealthy people won't be able to abuse the poor who might be forced to donate, especially since many of these transplants may fail anyway so we may be sacrificing healthy lives for those who may not make it anyway.

Furthermore, with or without alien technology our medical industry is being used primarily to maximize profits for the wealthy who already have more money than they need, not to look out for the best interests for all equally. Even without sophisticated research, or alien technology, we have enough evidence to show that Medicare for All will save billions of dollars every year and thousands of lives, as several studies have proven. And as Harriet Washington and Marcia Angell demonstrated our tax payer money finances most research for advanced medical technology, so there's no justification for patents enabling them to gouge consumers, driving them into bankruptcy, or worse, costing their lives because they can't afford it.

There may be stronger evidence to support the theory that there is some research going on to modify the weather, and that if aliens have been around for hundreds of years they may have already understood some of this over a hundred years ago, if not thousands of years ago. The evidence that our government, the military, numerous corporations and the academic community have been involved in weather modification research comes from reports available to the public, assuming they know where to look for it, including ten annual reports that were required by law in the nineteen-sixties.

I went into this previously in the second half of an article, Forgotten History Exposing The Illusion Of Democracy & Government Reports on Weather Control, which includes excerpts from at least four speeches by president Johnson and excerpts from the tenth and final mandatory report. If you're skeptical about possible alien involvement, you can go directly to the speeches by Johnson or read the entire Weather Modification: Tenth Annual Report, 1968 and read it. My article includes an abridged segment of this report, and perhaps the most important segment is the following excerpt from the Apendix on pages 110-112 where they express concerns about the revocation of mandatory reporting at a time when the research is getting more complicated:

Answers to many of the pressing social, economic, legal and ecological answers are needed now while the operational programs are still in the planning and pilot stage.

........

It is obvious that the ultimate development of successful weather control procedures requires that society learn how to use them well, and with a deep sense of understanding of the ultimate potential for both gain and loss. p.109

On July 18, 1968, Public Law 90-407 was signed by the President which provided, among other things, for modification of the scope of research activities by the National Science Foundation. Incorporated in this law was a clause repealing Public Law 85-510 as of September 1, 1968, under which the Foundation was required to maintain records of all field applications of weather modification activity and to report annually to the President and Congress. With this termination of the authority derived from Public Law 85-510, the Foundation amended its Federal Regulation 45 CFR 632 to delete the mandatory aspects of reporting and to request voluntary reporting from field operators of weather modification activities in the interest of scientific research. Since no Federal agency has been assigned authority to maintain or operate a mandatory reporting system as of September 1, 1968, the Federal Council for Science and Technology has requested the Foundation to continue to maintain these records on a voluntary submission basis until responsibility is assigned elsewhere.

….. It will be noted that the area reported each year to be under weather modification treatment increased in fiscal year 1967 over that of fiscal year 1966 by approximately 10 percent but declined sharply in fiscal year 1968. There is no way from the available records to assess this drop in reported area or operation except to note that in many cases operators have become much more conservative in estimating the size of the area to be affected by their seeding operations. ... p.111

From the table it is also noted that the number of reported projects dropped from 79 in fiscal year 1968, which might indicate that some new projects were not reported to the Foundation in the summer of 1968 due to the anticipated termination of Public Law 85-510. It is noted that the number of new projects reported under the voluntary reporting system since September 1, 1968, is considerably reduced over a similar period in the previous years when mandatory reporting was in effect. This appears to emphasize the need for reestablishing a mandatory reporting system at the earliest possible date if the scientific value of the reporting information is to be retained. In past years there were several instances where experimenters were alerted to possible interference patterns in their patterns in their operation and were able to get together to resolve possible conflicts. From this standpoint alone, Federal reporting has been of considerable value to both the Federal research establishment and the scientific community as a whole. These records have also been of great value to the general public in establishing the presence or absence of seeding activity in their geographic localities. P.111-2

This is clear evidence to indicate that the academic world has been conducting research into weather modification since the fifties, and at a time when they knew it was going to be more complicated, possibly effecting some people in positive ways and others in negative ways, increasing the need for more disclosure, they did the opposite, reducing the amount of disclosure required. Some of the researchers were clearly outraged, but they saved their strongest concerns for the appendix which normally fewer people read.

At the time the weather modification research publicly reported was relatively simple, including dissipating fog at airports, attempting to reduce large hail stones to reduce crop circles, which was done by increasing the number of hail stones per cubic meter, to absorb the moisture before the stones got bigger, ensuring they would melt before hitting the ground, and cloud seeding to increase rain in certain areas. There's no doubt that there's more advanced weather control research that has been done, but the most reliable research has only been reported in a relatively low profile manner, while some of the exaggerated less reliable claims often gets more attention.

For example, Tim Flannery, a credible scientist and author of "The Weather Makers" reported that after 9/11, when all air craft was grounded around the country, if not around the world, they found that the difference between night time temperatures and daytime temperatures increased by two degrees. The only way they could explain this was that contrails produced by airplanes reflected the sunlight cooling the planet slightly. This received very little attention; while claims about "Chemtrails" or "HAARP" which most scientists dismiss as fringe conspiracy theory often gets much more attention. Many people, including me are skeptical of most of these claims, but since the scientific community is conducting a large portion of their research in secret I can't completely rule out the possibility that some of it might be true.

Furthermore, if aliens have been around hundreds if not thousands of years, the largest UFO sighting, just over a hundred years ago, may provide evidence to show that they understood some form of weather control before our government and the academic world even began modern weather control research, and it may also provide evidence linking UFOs to religion. In 1917, on the thirteenth of each month from May to October, there were unusual phenomenon associated with religion that began with alleged visions to three little children. A lot of exaggerations and outright lies were added to this story, but based on the earliest reports after Jacinta, the youngest child, may have jumped to the conclusion that they saw "Our Lady." Within a day or so, Lucia Santos's mother asked her about it and she responded by saying, "I never said it was our lady rather a small pretty lady. I even asked Jacinta (age 7) and Francisco (age 9) to say nothing." Lucia, age 10, was considered the most reliable of the three children; while her cousins were prone to religious exaggerations, which they allegedly got from their father.

She went on to say, "She told me that we should continue to go there for six consecutive months, (the six months seems to include May, which had passed by this time, it was actually five more) on the 13th of each month, and at the end of the time, she would tell us who she was and what she wanted of us." The only prediction, at this time, was that she would return and contact them, which she seems to have done, although the children were all in a trance which was witnessed by more people on each of the following five months. There may have been an implied prediction of additional unusual phenomena, especially after June 13th when more witnesses saw unexplained things, which happened more each month as the crowd of witnesses also grew.

The unusual phenomena that happened each month, on the 13th and August 19th included additional visions of the "small pretty lady," which only the children could see while in a trance, unusual weather and UFOs, among other things which all the witnesses could see, including an estimated 50,000 people in October, as I went into in greater detail in UFO Hypothesis Far More Credible Than Catholic Claim of A "Miracle Of The Sun." That article explains much more, but there's a significant amount of evidence that there was contact from an unknown advanced intelligence, which Lucia referred to as "a small pretty lady," that knew that there would be UFOs and unusual weather phenomena would happen on the days predicted.

This could reasonably be interpreted as evidence to indicate that the same unknown advanced intelligence controlling UFOs may also be able to partially influence the weather, and may have been influencing religion for thousands of years, especially when considering the megaliths and other structures that should have been impossible to build with ancient technology thousands of years ago. If aliens did make contact with our government and the academic world the evidence showing they might have been able to partially control the weather would have been public at that time, although the vast majority of the public wouldn't have known where to look for it. However, the aliens and the academic world would have known where to look for this evidence, and more, so it could be taken into consideration if they made some form of deal to exchange for technology. Prior to the alleged contact point between aliens and out government, perhaps a few years after World War II, there was also an enormous amount of evidence of many unexplained mystics, which were often mixed up with false beliefs, but once again, both the aliens and the academic world would have known where to look for this evidence to fact check it, while considering a possible deal. Some additional evidence surrounding mystics may have included at least one, Padre Pio, who was alive at that time, and a couple others, Uri Geller and Jose Arigo, that became famous later. They would have been able to fact check these even closer while considering a possible deal.

Furthermore, Climate Change as a result of human activity is a form of geoengineering, and studying it is a form of studying weather modification, whether or not it's being done intentionally for that purpose. I went into this more previously as well in Hurricane Apocalypse Coming With or Without Fringe Conspiracy Theory. The weather modification report I cited above indicated they knew something about how industrial activity would impact the environment in the long run, at least one other source shows they may have understood some of it in the late fifties, and there are numerous reports showing the ExxonMobil understood much more than they admitted to in the eighties, at a time when the research was even stronger, yet they created Climate Change denial propaganda and lobbied to avoid accountability.

Furthermore, the weather modification report also shows that the military, oil companies, other corporations and colleges were all involved in weather modification research, and some of them worked with each other to coordinate their research. When we hear about oil companies who knew about this decades ago and covered it up while creating propaganda they know is false to increase profits we assume this is because of greed or fanaticism, but even for oil companies destroying the planet isn't in their own best interests. Nevertheless many will accept that this is because of greed for the oil companies and others that profit from it; however, there are many more people involved in this research and they know much better.

Are all the people involved in this research that aren't getting a significant share of the loot insanely obsessed with helping oil companies make massive amounts of money they can never spend while the environment is being destroyed? This makes even less sense when you consider the obvious fact that this money will be useless if it causes our society to collapse!

This makes absolutely no sense at all, and they must know something we don't or at least they must think they know something we don't!

If, on the other hand, this is part of a weather control research project, possibly as a result of a deal with aliens, then many of the people involved in it might think they can get advanced technology that might help reverse the process and repair the damage done; however, even without inside knowledge, there's an enormous amount of evidence to indicate that even if such a deal was made the aliens might not be trustworthy enough to keep their part of the deal or provide full disclosure of the amount of damage being done. Even without inside knowledge it's clear that an enormous number of innocent lives are being sacrificed, with little guarantee of any benefits.

And, of course, we've already been warned that we may be close to a point of no return, where we won't be able to repair the damage before it spirals out of control.

In both 2016 and 2020 Bernie Sanders ran on a massive progressive platform that included major reforms to reverse Climate Change and in 2018, The Squad also ran on this platform warning people that we only have ten to twelve years to implement massive changes to reverse Climate Change before we reach a point of no return where it will spiral beyond our control! Then all of these progressives, plus a few more elected before 2018 or in 2020 all abandoned their efforts to make significant changes and rallied behind Pelosi and Biden even though they're both ridiculing the reforms we need or lying about them, pretending small efforts will make a difference. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has even collected an enormous amount of money from progressive donors, who think they're donating to progressive causes and transfered those funds to corporate Democrats and those trained by the CIA!

Are progressives who claimed to champion the environment insanely obsessed with helping the oil companies make massive profits while destroying the planet? If they believe their own claims about a point of no return without massive changes, then the answer clearly appears to be yes.

I can't confirm their previous claims that we could be approaching a point of no return as a result of Climate Change spiraling out of control in ten years; however there is an enormous amount of evidence to indicate that we should have stopped the environmental destruction decades ago and begun repairing the damage, and there's no doubt the longer we wait the harder it will be assuming it's possible, to repair the damage. This is also true with or without advanced technology that might be available from aliens.

Also, whether the massive advances in technology happened with or without influence from aliens, they're being controlled by a small fraction of the public and they're far more concerned with using this technology to enrich themselves and control the masses than using it to benefit most of us. This is true in one field after another, for example, instead of using increased research to resolve our differences, we're using massive advances in technology to ensure that we're at a permanent state of war, and those controlling it can dominate the third world; instead of providing Medicare for All saving enormous amount of money and lives, they gouging people costing many lives; instead of dramatically increasing the use of clean energy, possibly by taxing fossil fuels to subsidize clean energy, we continue providing much more subsidies for oil companies escalating the destruction of the environment; instead of repairing public water so it's safe and inexpensive, we're marketing bottled water, which costs much more, creates astronomical amount of plastic waste, and is destroying much more of our fresh water supply; and one issue after another that is destructive for the majority for short term unsustainable profits for campaign donors!

If the rapid development of technology wasn't brought about with the help of alien technology there's still an enormous amount of evidence to indicate that it was done with the help of government subsidies, as some people including Noam Chomsky say, in a system which "Socializes the risk and privatizes the profit," which means the oligarchs controlling our economy obtained their wealth through fraud not innovation. Making a case showing how large corporations dominated the market as a result of political connections is beyond the scope of this article but other sources show how oligarchs like Walmart, Amazon, insurance companies, military contractors and many other corporations.

However, if alien technology has been used to develop all the modern advancements this makes the argument much stronger to nationalize many industries that have been benefiting unfairly from this technology, which is used primarily to control the majority of us while only providing most benefits for a small minority with political connections and access to important information to make decisions.

In a functioning Democracy we all need access to the information on every given subject to make important decisions. When it comes to UFOs either they're hiding an enormous amount of information about the existence of the UFOs and many other unsolved mysteries, including mystics, crop circles, cattle mutilations etc. or there's a massive effort to make it seem like UFOs are here when they're not. This isn't limited to this subject; on any other subject there's one version of truth presented by the mass media and another one for a small percentage of the public that researches better sources and finds out the media and political establishment are distorting the truth or in many cases outright lying!

Those who study foreign policy honestly, checking alternative sources, know that we fight one war after another based on lies, not to defend freedom; those that study our economic system with an open mind know that it's rigged in favor of the rich; those that study environmental destruction and Climate Change know that both political parties are catering to corporations and the same goes for many other subjects, where people check alternative media outlets that do much better fact checking. In most of these subjects there is much better research in alternative media outlets, libraries, and the academic world than there is for UFOs, but we can be certain they're distorting the truth on just about every subject.

And we can be certain that if more people took UFOs seriously we would have much better peer review. As it stands, with a large segment of the academic world ridiculing the subject, instead of taking it seriously some unreliable sources like David Wilcock and Zecharia Sitchin to dominate the discussion with many people. When traditional scientists ridicule the subject and ignore obvious flaws in their beliefs they lose their credibility and weaken their ability to refute false claims. Others may do a better job, but if they have to argue against both the quacks on one side and the pseudo-skeptics on the other they have less time to make good cases for real viable explanations.

The following are some additional sources or related articles:

This is all the more reason for all of us to learn the fundamentals of science and UFOs so we can figure it out ourselves!

The Condon Report which was headed by Edward Condon

The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects, by Edward J. Ruppelt

"The Day After Roswell." by Colonel Philip Corso

Richard Dolan "UFOs and the National Security State: The Cover-Up Exposed, 1973-1991" 2009.

Victor Stenger God: The Failed Hypothesis 2007 In the language of science, the empirical fact of unnecessary suffering in the world is inconsistent with a god who is omniscient, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent. Observations of human and animal suffering look just as they can be expected to look if there is no God. p.224

UFO Hypothesis Far More Credible Than Catholic Claim of A "Miracle Of The Sun"

Barack Obama just gave us permission to take UFOs seriously! Some of us never needed permission! 05/31/2021

Rep. Gohmert asks whether federal agencies can fix climate change by altering orbit of the Earth and moon 06/09/2021

Drivers Of The New UFO Narrative Keep Absurdly Saying They Could Be Dangerous ETs 05/02/2021

Eight Thoughts On The “UFO” Narrative 06/03/2021

MSM Wastes No Time Using Senate UFO Report To Promote Arms Race 06/04/2021

Media Converges On The Narrative That UFOs May Be Russian/Chinese Threat 06/06/2021

Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena 06/25/2021

UFO Documents Index

US intelligence community releases long-awaited UFO report 06/25/2021

It came out of the sky: US releases highly anticipated UFO report 06/25/2021

UFOs: Fact or Fiction? | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov)

China Releases Plans for Permanent Mars Base 06/25/2021 The race to establish a human presence on Mars is heating up.

Astronomer Avi Loeb Says Aliens Have Visited, and He’s Not Kidding 02/01/2021

In 1953 a scientist predicted a man titled 'Elon' would lead humans to Mars and crown himself 'Martian Emperor' 06/11/2021